Generative Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Emerging Economies: A Technology-Organization-Environment Framework Analysis of Large Language Model Integration in Small and Medium Enterprises

The proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), has precipitated substantial transformations in organizational practices across developed economies. However, a conspicuous lacuna persists in scholarly understanding concerning the adoption dynamics within emerging market contexts where resource constraints and infrastructural limitations present distinctive challenges. This study investigates the determinants and outcomes of GenAI adoption among Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) across BRICS+ nations, employing the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework as theoretical foundation. Through a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, we collected quantitative data from 487 manufacturing and service sector SMEs during March-August 2025 and supplemented findings with 32 semi-structured interviews with senior managers. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis reveals that technological readiness (β = 0.412, p < .001), leadership support (β = 0.378, p < .001) and competitive pressure (β = 0.289, p < .01) significantly influence GenAI adoption. Furthermore, findings indicate that GenAI adoption mediates the relationship between organizational factors and firm performance, with AI-driven marketing strategies moderating this relationship. The study contributes to digital transformation literature by extending TOE framework applicability to GenAI contexts in resource-constrained settings and offers practical implications for policymakers seeking to foster inclusive AI ecosystems.

Generative AI, Large Language Models

1. Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almashawreh, R., Talukder, M., Charath, S. K., & Khan, M. I. (2024). AI adoption in Jordanian SMEs: The influence of technological and organizational orientations. SAGE Open, 14(2), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Somali, S. A., Gholami, R., & Clegg, B. (2024). Cybersecurity adoption in SMEs: Technology-organization-environment framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), 1124-1141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anthropic. (2024). Claude model card and evaluations. https://www.anthropic.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F. A., Arroyabe, J. C. F., & Arroyabe, I. F. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption in the European Union: An empirical analysis of 12,108 SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122953. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ateeq, A. (2024). Digital transformation and organizational performance in emerging economies. Sustainability, 16(3), 1035. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Badghish, S., & Soomro, Y. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption by SMEs to achieve sustainable business performance: Application of technology-organization-environment framework. Sustainability, 16(5), 1864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(1), 71-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 77-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. David, L. K. (2025). Digital transformation and socio-economic development in emerging economies: A multinational analysis. Technology in Society, 82, 102547. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019, 4171-4186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ding, J. (2025). DeepSeek, Huawei, export controls and the future of the U.S.-China AI race. CSIS Analysis. Center for Strategic and International Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., Okike, C. K., & Bello, A. O. (2019). Factors influencing the use of e-learning facilities by students in a private higher education institution. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, 133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gaglio, C., Ferraris, A., Battisti, E., & Bresciani, S. (2022). Digital transformation and innovation in emerging economies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(6), 734-754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ghobakhloo, M., & Tang, S. H. (2013). The role of owner/manager in adoption of electronic commerce in small businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(4), 754-787. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kopka, A., & Fornahl, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence and firm performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Research Policy, 53(2), 104912. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Dongming, X. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information & Management, 56(3), 445-461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Perrault, R., Parli, V., Reuel, A., Brynjolfsson, E., ... & Clark, J. (2025). The AI Index 2025 annual report. Stanford University Human-Centered AI Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier. McKinsey & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. McKinsey & Company. (2024). The state of AI in early 2024: Gen AI adoption spikes and starts to generate value. McKinsey & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nekmahmud, M., & Rahman, S. (2023). Digital technology adoption in SMEs: What technological, environmental and organizational factors influence in emerging countries? SAGE Open, 13(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187-192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Omol, E. J. (2023). Organizational readiness for digital transformation: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv:2303.08774. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Peláez-Sánchez, I. C., Velarde-Camaqui, D., & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2024). The impact of large language models on higher education: Exploring the connection between AI and Education 4.0. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1392091. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Soomro, Y. A., Badghish, S., & Khan, M. A. (2025). Exploring AI adoption and SME performance in resource-constrained environments: A TOE-RBV perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(3), 100438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. UNCTAD. (2025). Technology and innovation report 2025: Frontier technologies readiness index. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998-6008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yakov Partners. (2024). Generative AI in BRICS+ countries: Trends and outlook. Yakov and Partners. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
• Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
• Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
• Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
• Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper