Geopolitical Risk and the Financial Effects of US Monetary Tightening: Evidence on Capital Flows and Currency Volatility in Emerging Asia (2015–2026)
Authors
Amanora School, Pune (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600585
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 8384-8398
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-10
Accepted: 2026-06-15
Published: 2026-06-30
Abstract
This study is an attempt to discuss the relationship between geopolitical risk, US monetary policy, capital flows and exchange rate volatility in emerging Asian economies during the period 2015-2026. The impact of geopolitical uncertainty and global monetary conditions has been studied separately in the literature, but the combined and time-varying effect of these two factors on the financial stability of emerging markets has been less studied (Dario Caldara & Matteo Iacoviello, 2018; Hélène Rey, 2018).
To fill this void, this paper examines the impacts of geopolitical risk and US monetary tightening on the magnitude and stochastic properties of capital flows in emerging Asia and how this affects exchange rate fluctuations. The economies of the region are especially vulnerable to external shocks as well as shifts in global liquidity conditions (Rey, 2018; Aizenman et al., 2022).
This study offers fresh evidence linking the transmission of external shocks to financial channels in the presence of a non-linear, asymmetric, and time-varying relationship between variables, which are captured by an advanced econometric framework (Balcılar et al., 2021; Primiceri, 2005). The results provide a more complex picture of financial spillovers internationally and identify the context in which emerging markets are particularly exposed (Salisu et al., 2021).
Evidence is drawn from a panel of six emerging Asian economies - India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines - over 2015–2026. Overall, the results have significant policy implications for policymakers aiming to enhance financial resilience in a more interconnected and uncertain global environment.
Keywords
Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR); US Federal Reserve Policy; Capital Flow Volatility; Exchange Rate Dynamics
Downloads
References
1. Aizenman, J., Jinjarak, Y., & Park, D. (2022). Capital flows and financial stability in emerging Asia: Risks and policy responses. Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Balcılar, M., Çakır, C., & Demir, E. (2021). Time-varying spillovers and financial contagion in emerging markets: Evidence from a TVP-VAR approach. Emerging Markets Review, 47, 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Beirne, J., & Renzhi, N. (2025). Exchange rate volatility and capital flow reversals in emerging Asia: An empirical assessment. Journal of International Money and Finance, 126, 102682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.102682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Burger, J. D., Warnock, F. E., & Warnock, V. C. (2015). Emerging local currency bond markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 52, 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2018). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 108(4–5), 124–126. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20181000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. International Monetary Fund. (2017). Macroprudential policy in emerging markets: Tools and effectiveness. IMF Policy Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. International Monetary Fund. (2020). Regional financial cooperation in Asia: Strengthening the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization. IMF Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Khaliq, A., Shahbaz, M., & Usman, M. (2024). Uncertainty trinity and financial markets in emerging economies. Economic Modelling, 125, 106241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Primiceri, G. E. (2005). Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy. Review of Economic Studies, 72(3), 821–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Rey, H. (2018). Dilemma not trilemma: The global financial cycle and monetary policy independence. Proceedings – Economic Policy Symposium, Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Rifa'i, F. (2023). Capital flow volatility in emerging markets: Causes and consequences. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(6), 1852–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2098374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Salisu, A. A., Ogbonna, A. E., & Raheem, I. D. (2021). Geopolitical risk and exchange rate volatility in emerging markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 57, 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Wu, J., & Xia, F. D. (2016). Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the zero lower bound. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(2–3), 253–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Yilmazkuday, H. (2025). Geopolitical risk and exchange rate volatility in emerging markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 79, 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Additional References [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Antonakakis, N., Gupta, R., Kollias, C., & Papadamou, S. (2017). Geopolitical risks and the oil-stock nexus over 1899–2016. Finance Research Letters, 23, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Athey, S. (2018). The impact of machine learning on economics. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (pp. 507–547). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Broner, F., Didier, T., Erce, A., & Schmukler, S. L. (2013). Gross capital flows: Dynamics and crises. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Bruno, V., & Shin, H. S. (2015). Capital flows and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 71, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.11.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Davis, S. J. (2016). An index of global economic policy uncertainty. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 22740. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Dornbusch, R. (1976). Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1086/260506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Eichengreen, B., & Gupta, P. (2015). Tapering talk: The impact of expectations of reduced Federal Reserve security purchases on emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 25, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Engel, C. (2014). Exchange rates and interest parity. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 453–522). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market co-movements. Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223–2261. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Forbes, K. J., & Warnock, F. E. (2012). Capital flow waves: Surges, stops, flight, and retrenchment. Journal of International Economics, 88(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.03.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Ghosh, A. R., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2016). When do capital inflow surges end in tears? American Economic Review, 106(5), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Gu, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D. (2020). Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. Review of Financial Studies, 33(5), 2223–2273. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (2nd ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Hofmann, B., Shim, I., & Shin, H. S. (2020). Emerging market economy exchange rates and local currency bond markets amid the Covid-19 pandemic. BIS Bulletin No. 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Iacoviello, M., & Caldara, D. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. Federal Reserve Board Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Miranda-Agrippino, S., & Rey, H. (2020). U.S. monetary policy and the global financial cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 87(6), 2754–2776. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Obstfeld, M. (2015). Trilemmas and trade-offs: Living with financial globalization. BIS Working Papers No. 480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Obstfeld, M., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2019). A tie that binds: Revisiting the trilemma in emerging market economies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Pesaran, M. H., & Pick, A. (2007). Econometric issues in the analysis of contagion. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(4), 1245–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2006.05.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Shin, H. S. (2017). Global liquidity and procyclicality. World Bank Conference on Financial Globalization and Emerging Markets. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. World Bank. (2025). Global Economic Prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Asian Development Bank. (2024). Asian Economic Integration Report 2024. Manila: Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Bank for International Settlements. (2024). BIS Quarterly Review: International Banking and Financial Market Developments. Basel: Bank for International Settlements. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. International Monetary Fund. (2025). Global Financial Stability Report. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. International Monetary Fund. (2024). World Economic Outlook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study