Governance Quality and Economic Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis

This study examines the effect of governance quality on economic performance in Sub-Saharan Africa using panel data for 23 countries over the period 2004–2024. The study employs panel estimation techniques, including pooled ordinary least squares, fixed effects, and random effects models. The Hausman specification test indicates that the fixed effects model is the most appropriate for the analysis. To ensure robust statistical inference and control for both country-specific and time-specific effects, the study further employs a two-way fixed effects model with White cross-section robust standard errors. The findings reveal that voice and accountability, trade openness, and government effectiveness exert positive effects on economic performance, with voice and accountability and trade openness remaining statistically significant, while government effectiveness is weakly significant. Other governance indicators were not statistically significant. The results suggest that governance influences economic performance in a dimension-specific manner, with accountability and institutional effectiveness playing more prominent roles in promoting economic performance within the region. The study concludes that strengthening institutional accountability, improving governance effectiveness, and promoting trade openness are essential for enhancing economic performance in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Governance quality; Economic performance; Panel data; Sub-Saharan Africa; Institutional quality

1. Abbas, Q., Li, J., Muhammad, R., & Sumbal, F. (2021). Role of governance in debt–growth relationship: Evidence from panel data estimations. Sustainability, 13, 5954. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alemu, T. (2023). External debt, institutional quality, and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Development Review, 35(2), 123–137. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Apergis, N., & Cooray, A. (2023). Governance thresholds and the debt–growth nexus in developing economies. Economic Modelling, 120, 106123. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-modelling. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Assoum, F., & Alinsato, A. S. (2023). Only under good governance does public debt improve national income: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model for Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of Government and Economics, 10, 100078. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-government-and-economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fosu, A. K. (2020). Institutions and African economic development: An overview. Journal of African Economies, 29(Suppl. 2), ii3–ii10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Isser, D., Raballand, G., Watts, M., & Zovighian, D. (2024). Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa in the 21st century: Four trends and an uncertain outlook (Policy Research Working Paper No. 10713). World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430). World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Manasseh, C. O., Abada, F. C., Okiche, E. L., Okanya, O., Nwakoby, I. C., Offu, P., Ogbuagu, A. R., Okafor, C. O., Obidike, P. C., & Nwonye, N. G. (2022). External debt and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does governance matter? PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0264082. https://journals.plos.org/plosone. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Musa, K., Sohag, K., Said, J., Ghapar, F., & Ali, N. (2023). Public debt, governance, and growth in developing countries: An application of quantile via moments. Mathematics, 11(3), 650. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/mathematics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Oppong, C. (2023). Public debt and economic growth nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of institutional quality. International Review of Applied Economics, 37(3), 311–323. https://www.tandfonline.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. (2021). Economic report on Africa 2021: Addressing debt vulnerabilities – Economic transformation and sustainable development. UNECA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Bank. (2024). Africa’s pulse: An analysis of issues shaping Africa’s economic future (October 2024 ed.). World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/africa-pulse/october-2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Correlation of Marketing Strategies and Financial Performance of Motor Parts Businesses in the City of Mati
• The Role of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts in Enhancing Financial Transparency and Efficiency in the Emerging Market
• Exploring Intention among Universiti Teknologi Mara Terengganu Community to Donate into Education Waqf Fund
• Utilizing AHP Method to Rank Preference of Waqf Fund Usage for UiTM Terengganu, Malaysia
• The Influence of Portfolio Diversification on Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Banks on the Ghana Stock Exchange