Grade 11 Learners’ Motivation and Mastery Levels in Gas Laws: An Analytical Study

Authors

Isnihara Limbona

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Edna Nabua

Malabang Community High School (Philippines)

Bianca Latonio

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Rey Paolo Micutuan

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Mudjahid Abdurahman

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Eduardo Navalta

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Threcia Poblete

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Hanna Lyn Taglorin

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200125

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 1678-1688

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-09

Accepted: 2025-12-16

Published: 2026-01-03

Abstract

This study investigated Grade 11 students’ mastery of gas laws and their motivation toward learning chemistry. Guided by existing literature on students’ conceptual difficulties in physical science, the research sought to classify learners’ competency levels as least mastered, not mastered, nearly mastered, or mastered based on achievement test performance. A descriptive-survey design was employed using a researcher-developed test questionnaire. The instrument underwent pilot testing with 100 students from Iligan City National High School – Tambacan Annex in Northern Mindanao, Philippines, and was validated through item difficulty and discrimination analyses. The finalized assessment was administered to an additional sample of 50 Grade 11 students. Results indicated generally low mastery of gas laws, with one competency rated as not mastered and the remaining competencies categorized as least mastered. Students exhibited substantial difficulty with the kinetic molecular theory, Boyle’s Law, Charles’s Law, the combined gas law, and the ideal gas law. Results also showed a very weak, negative, and non-significant correlation between the two variables, rs= −.06, p = .659, N = 50 which indicates that learners’ level of motivation was not significantly associated with their conceptual understanding of gas-law concepts. Findings highlight persistent gaps in conceptual understanding and emphasize the need for enhanced instructional approaches, targeted interventions, and the development of supportive learning materials to improve students’ mastery of gas law concepts.

Keywords

Competencies, Gas Laws, Mastery level

Downloads

References

1. Eke, G. (2008). Regulatory Mechanism for Sound Chemicals Management. A paper presented at the 1st Mandatory Training workshop of ICON in Lagos, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Mahdi, J. (2014). Student Attitudes towards Chemistry: An Examination of Choices and Preferences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Science and Education Publishing.https://pubs.sciepub.com/education/2/6/3/index.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Montes, L. H., Ferreira, R. A., Rodríguez, C. (2018). Explaining secondary school students’ attitudes towards chemistry in Chile. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2). http://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00003d [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Navarette Jr. et al. (2023). Gas Rules!: An Electronic Strategic Intervention Material for Online Learning: Students' Conceptual Understanding and Perceptions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Nja, C., Umall, B. C., Asuquo, E., & Orim, R. (2019). The influence of learning styles on academic performance among science education undergraduates at the University of Calabar. Educational Research and Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Omolade, O. (2008). Effects of Lecture Demonstration and Lecture Teaching Methods on Students’Achievement in Secondary School Chemistry. Journal of Teacher Education 9(10), 175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Pintrich, P. & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Sáez, M. & Carretero, A. (2002). The challenge of innovation: The new subject 'natural sciences' in Spain. Journal of Curriculum Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Serway, R. & Jewett, J. (2014). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics (9th ed.).Brooks/Cole. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles