Green HRM in the Age of Remote Work: Examining Its Impact on Employee Productivity and Work-Life Balance

The rapid globalisation of remote work, accelerated markedly by the COVID-19 pandemic, has compelled organisations to revisit foundational assumptions about how human resource strategies shape employee outcomes. This study investigates the extent to which Green Human Resource Management (Green HRM) practices influence employee productivity and work-life balance (WLB) among full-time remote workers in India. Anchored in Conservation of Resources Theory, Social Exchange Theory and Clark's Border Theory, the study proposes and empirically tests a structural model in which WLB serves as a partial mediating variable. Primary data were gathered from 350 validated survey responses drawn from remote employees across the information technology, banking, education and healthcare sectors in Karnataka and Telangana. A two-stage analytical approach — Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) followed by Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in AMOS 24 — was employed to evaluate the measurement and structural models. Results indicate that Green HRM exerts a significant positive direct effect on both productivity (β = 0.53, p < 0.001) and WLB (β = 0.62, p < 0.001). The indirect pathway from Green HRM to productivity through WLB was likewise significant (β = 0.28, 95% CI [0.19, 0.38]), confirming partial mediation. Demographic sub-group analyses revealed stronger effect magnitudes among female employees and workers in the educational sector. The study contributes to an emerging body of scholarship at the nexus of sustainable HRM and remote work, offering both theoretical extensions and actionable guidance for practitioners and policymakers.

Green HRM; Remote Work; Employee Productivity; Work-Life Balance

1. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2021). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work-family balance: A review and extension. In Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–183). APA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kniffin, K. M., et al. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Koopmans, L., et al. (2014). Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(10), 1128–1145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Opatha, H. H. D. N. P., & Arulrajah, A. A. (2014). Green human resource management: Simplified general reflections. International Business Research, 7(8), 101–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shah, M. (2019). Green human resource management: Development of a valid measurement scale. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 771–785. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paille, P., & Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: Scale development and validity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 31–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., & Fawehinmi, O. (2020). Nexus between green intellectual capital and green human resource management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria