Happiness and Sadness Metaphor Translation in Daneshvar's Savushun: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Conceptual Mapping Strategies across Two English Versions

This study investigates the translation of happiness and sadness metaphors in Simin Daneshvar’s Savushun by comparing two English translations: Mohammad Reza Ghanoonparvar’s Savushun and Roxane Zand’s a Persian Requiem. Translating metaphor is among the most demanding problems in literary translation because figurative meaning is constituted not by wording alone but by the interaction of embodied cognition and cultural context. These pressures intensify when the metaphors encode emotion; happiness and sadness are expressed through imagery that varies substantially across cultures in ways that resist lexical equivalence. This study examines how metaphorical expressions belonging to these two domains in Simin Daneshvar's Savushun were rendered in two English translations: Mohammad Reza Ghanoonparvar's 1990 version and Roxane Zand's 1991 A Persian Requiem. A parallel corpus was assembled from the Persian source text and both target versions. Metaphorical expressions were identified using Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980) and the Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglejazz Group, 2007), then classified into six categories: (1) similar conceptual mapping with similar metaphorical expression, (2) similar mapping with different expression, (3) different mapping with similar expression, (4) different mapping with different expression, (5) non-metaphorical rendering, and (6) omission. Frequency counts and proportional comparisons were run across all categories for both translators. Sadness metaphors appeared at nearly twice the rate of happiness metaphors in the source text. Both translators neutralized metaphors more often than they preserved them; non-metaphorical rendering (Category 5) was the dominant strategy in both versions. The translators' preferences diverged: Ghanoonparvar held closer to source-domain imagery; Zand applied paraphrase and omission more frequently. Conceptual equivalence proved more recoverable than lexical equivalence. The findings show that sadness metaphors occurred substantially more often than happiness metaphors in the source text. Both translators preserved many source metaphors but differed in strategic preference: one retained metaphorical imagery more consistently, while the other more frequently employed neutralization and paraphrase as target-oriented strategies. The most common strategy in both translations was preservation of conceptual meaning with altered lexical form. The findings suggest that metaphor translation from Persian into English is shaped by conceptual compatibility and translator decision-making alongside linguistic equivalence. These results are discussed in relation to domestication and foreignization as broader orientations in literary translation. The study's scope and generalizability are limited by corpus size, domain selection, and single-analyst coding, and these constraints are addressed in the limitations section.

conceptual metaphor theory; emotion metaphor

1. Al-Zoubi, M. Q., & Al-Hasnawi, A. R. (2007). Cogno-cultural issues in translating metaphors. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 14(4), 230–239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dagut, M. B. (1976). Can 'metaphor' be translated? Babel: International Journal of Translation, 22(1), 21–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Daneshvar, S. (2001). Savushun: A novel about modern Iran (M. R. Ghanoonparvar, Trans.). Mage Publishers. (Original work published 1969) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Daneshvar, S. (1991). A Persian requiem (R. Zand, Trans.). Peter Halban Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Deignan, A. (2003). Metaphorical expressions and culture: An indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 255–271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kövecses, Z. (2022). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, 2, 202–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Maalej, Z. (2002). Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 51–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mandelblit, N. (1995). The cognitive view of metaphor and its implications for translation theory. Translation and Meaning, 3, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Moradi, M. R., & Mashak, S. P. (2013). A comparative and contrastive study of sadness conceptualization in Persian and English. English Linguistics Research, 2(1), 107–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Muelas-Gil, M. (2023). Metaphorical pattern analysis and MIPVU combined: A case study merging existing methods to identify metaphor in discourse. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 36(2), 528–555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T., & Reijnierse, W. G. (Eds.). (2019). Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pragglejazz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ramazani, Z. (2024). Savushun: A postcolonial reading. Uppsala University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rundell, M. (2008). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners (2nd ed.). Macmillan Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Safarnejad, F., Ho-Abdullah, I., & Mat Awal, N. (2014). Cultural basis of metaphors translation: Case of emotions in Persian and English. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Schäffner, C. (2004). Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1253–1269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Steen, G. J. (2009). From linguistic form to conceptual structure in five steps: Analysing metaphor in poetry. Cognitive Poetics, 10, 197–226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tabatabaei, S., & Ivanova, E. A. (2022). Comparative study of emotional metaphor in Persian and English as a human conceptual framework in cultural anthropology. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language, Communication and Culture Studies (ICLCCS 2022), 3–11. Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zeng, Y., & Ahrens, K. (2023). A new space in corpus-assisted literary translation analyses. Proceedings of NeTTT 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests