Healthcare Providers’ Ethical Navigation of Adolescent Abortion Care in Lusaka, Zambia

Background: Adolescent abortion care often poses ethical and practical challenges for healthcare providers. Debates commonly focus on adolescents’ decision-making capacity, the role of parental involvement, and how to balance respect for autonomy with the implementation of policies and guidelines. This study investigated the ethical debates surrounding adolescent abortion care in Lusaka, Zambia, from healthcare providers’ perspectives. Using an interpretive phenomenological approach, the study explored how providers understand adolescents’ autonomy, parental involvement, and their ethical responsibilities in abortion care.
Methods: This qualitative study used an interpretive phenomenological design and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to explore healthcare providers’ experiences supporting adolescents seeking abortion services in Lusaka, Zambia. The study was conducted in the Lusaka and Chongwe districts and involved mid-level providers engaged in abortion care. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with twelve healthcare providers. Data were analysed manually through iterative reading of transcripts, identification of exploratory comments, and development of subordinate and superordinate themes. Microsoft Word and Excel were used to organise analytic tables and emerging themes.
Results: Three interconnected themes emerged. First, providers viewed adolescents’ abortion decisions as shaped by wider social factors, including educational goals, financial difficulties, stigma, and relationship instability. Second, providers described assessing adolescents’ decision-making capacity through relational interactions, considering knowledge, communication, and educational background rather than age alone. Third, providers emphasised the balancing act between adolescent autonomy and parental involvement, often acting as mediators to reconcile legal obligations, parental authority, and adolescents’ views.
Conclusion: Providers viewed adolescent abortion decision-making as a socially embedded, relational process rather than a purely individual choice. Policies and clinical guidance should better support providers in assessing adolescents’ evolving capacities and in managing parental involvement while safeguarding adolescents’ autonomy and access to care.

adolescent abortion; decision-making capacity; autonomy; parental involvement; healthcare providers

1. Allen, L. R., Adams, N., Ashley, F., Dodd, C., Ehrensaft, D., Fraser, L., Garcia, M., Giordano, S., Green, J., Johnson, T., Penny, J., Rachlin, K., & Veale, J. F. (2025). Principlism and contemporary ethical considerations for providers of transgender health care. International Journal of Transgender Health, 26(3), 611-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2024.2303462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beauchamp, T. L. (2003). Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Beauchamp, T. L. (2016). Principlism in bioethics. In Bioethical decision making and argumentation (pp. 1-16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Campbell, O. M., Aquino, E. M., Vwalika, B., & Gabrysch, S. (2016). Signal functions for measuring the ability of health facilities to provide abortion services: An illustrative analysis using a health facility census in Zambia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0872-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clarke, D. L. (2009). Moral principlism alone is insufficient, and traditional moral theories remain important for practical ethics. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 2(2), 54-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Debuo Der, A., & Ganle, J. K. (2026). Ethical issues in providing comprehensive abortion care to adolescents: A qualitative study of healthcare providers in the Eastern Region of Ghana. BMC Medical Ethics, 27, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01398-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dempsey, B., Callaghan, S., & Higgins, M. F. (2024). Providers’ experiences with abortion care: A scoping review. PLoS One, 19(7), e0303601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Eatough, V., & Smith, J. A. (2006). I feel like a scrambled egg in my head: An idiographic case study of meaning making and anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 79(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608305X41100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Engelbert Bain, L., Amoakoh-Coleman, M., Tiendrebeogo, K. S., Zweekhorst, M. B., de Cock Buning, T., & Becquet, R. (2020). Attitudes towards abortion and decision-making capacity of pregnant adolescents: Perspectives of medicine, midwifery and law students in Accra, Ghana. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 25(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2020.1730792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Engelbert Bain, L., Zweekhorst, M. B. M., Amoakoh-Coleman, M., Muftugil-Yalcin, S., Omolade, A. I.-O., Becquet, R., & de Cock Buning, T. (2019). To keep or not to keep? Decision-making in adolescent pregnancies in Jamestown, Ghana. PLoS One, 14(9), e0221789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fekadu, A., Berhe, A., Belgu, B., Yimer, I., Tesfaye, Y., Holcombe, S. J., & Burrowes, S. (2022). Professionalism, stigma, and willingness to provide patient-centred safe abortion counselling and care: A mixed methods study of Ethiopian midwives. Reproductive Health, 19(Suppl 1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01238-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fetters, T., Samandari, G., Djemo, P., Vwallika, B., & Mupeta, S. (2017). Moving from legality to reality: How medical abortion methods were introduced with implementation science in Zambia. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0289-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gebremedhin, M., Semahegn, A., Usmael, T., & Tesfaye, G. (2018). Unsafe abortion and associated factors among reproductive aged women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0775-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Government of the Republic of Zambia. (1972). The Termination of Pregnancy Act. https://www.parliament.gov.zm/sites/default/files/documents/acts/Termination%20of%20Pregnancy%20Act.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Haaland, M. E. S., Haukanes, H., Zulu, J. M., Moland, K. M., Michelo, C., Munakampe, M. N., & Blystad, A. (2019). Shaping the abortion policy-competing discourses on the Zambian Termination of Pregnancy Act. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0908-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Haddad, L. B., & Nour, N. M. (2009). Unsafe abortion: Unnecessary maternal mortality. Reviews in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2(2), 122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Likwa, R. N., Biddlecom, A., & Ball, H. (2009). Unsafe abortion in Zambia. Issues Brief, (3), 1-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lindridge, J. (2017). Principlism: When values conflict. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 9(4), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2017.9.4.158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lokubal, P., Corcuera, I., Balil, J. M., Frischer, S. R., Kayemba, C. N., Kurinczuk, J. J., Opondo, C., & Nair, M. (2022). Abortion decision-making process trajectories and determinants in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine, 54, 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lubeya, M. K., Mukosha, M., Jacobs, C., Chanda, K., Phiri, C. C., Munakampe, M. N., Sichone, V., Makasa, M., Mangala, B., Vwalika, B., & Kaonga, P. (2022). Magnitude and determinants of unsafe abortion among Zambian women presenting for abortion care services: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 159(3), 979. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. McCarthy, J. (2003). Principlism or narrative ethics: Must we choose between them? Medical Humanities, 29(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1136/mh.29.2.65 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. McLean, E., Desalegn, D. N., Blystad, A., & Miljeteig, I. (2019). When the law makes doors slightly open: Ethical dilemmas among abortion service providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0396-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. McReynolds-Pérez, J. (2017). Abortion as empowerment: Reproductive rights activism in a legally restricted context. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(Suppl 2), 350. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1498-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Neale, J. (2020). Research methods for health and social care. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Revon, G., & Reiss, J. (2025). Principlism in bioethics: How to consolidate autonomy? A scoping review. Bioethics Open Research, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.12688/bioethopenres.17704.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114550439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9(1), 41-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463714541642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tatum, C., Rueda, M., Bain, J., Clyde, J., & Carino, G. (2012). Decision making regarding unwanted pregnancy among adolescents in Mexico City: A qualitative study. Studies in Family Planning, 43(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00301.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wall, L. L., & Yemane, A. (2022). Infectious complications of abortion. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 9(11), ofac553. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. World Health Organisation. (2024, April 10). Adolescent pregnancy. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-pregnancy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. World Health Organisation. (2025). Abortion: Key facts. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study