Holistic Organizational Transformation and Dual-Mode Innovation Culture: Explaining Apple’s Strategic Marketing Success and Sustainability

Authors

Aini Khalida Muslim

Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi dan Teknousahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Malaysia)

Athirah Mohd Tan

Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi dan Teknousahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Pakistan)

Naveed Ahmad

Faculty of Business Education, Social Sciences & Humanities, Department of Management Sciences, Isra Unviersity, Hyderabad, Sindh (Malaysia)

Muhamad Izaidi Ishak

Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (Malaysia)

Vimala Govinda Raj

GV Universal Resources (Malaysia)

Dzunnur Zaily Mohd Dzulkifli

Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.92800048

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 9/28 | Page No: 482-491

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-02

Accepted: 2025-12-10

Published: 2025-12-29

Abstract

This theoretical paper has explored how the organizational change in Apple Inc. in terms of leadership, corporate culture, operations, marketing and human resource management led to its long-term competitive advantage. Despite the large body of research on Apple in terms of innovation and branding, previous research studies had hardly combined internal variables into a single theoretical framework, which made a gap in the conceptualization of how cross-functional change influenced the long-term marketing performance. To surmount this shortcoming, the paper has synthesized recent works in the literature of strategies management, organizational behavior and marketing to create a holistic framework, which interpreted how Apple changed its leadership with a personality to a process-driven stability, how it has created a hybrid culture of secrecy and collaboration, and how it has transformed its supply chain and human resource. The synthesis showed that all these combined improvements contributed to the Apple innovation capability, creation of customer value, and market resilience, and new challenges, including competitive pressure, privacy concerns, intellectual property debate, supply chain ethics, and sustainability pressures were still affecting the strategic direction of the company. The innovation of the paper was the cross-functional transformation lens and new constructs such as leadership continuity transformation and ethical branding misalignment supply chain. The research paper was meant to contribute to the conceptual knowledge of organizational change and its meaning to the researcher studying strategic change in international technology companies.

Keywords

Organizational Transformation, Leadership

Downloads

References

1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2022). The importance of corporate reputation for sustainable supply chains: A systematic literature review, bibliometric mapping, and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asif, M., Yang, L., & Hashim, M. (2024). The role of digital transformation, corporate culture, and leadership in enhancing corporate sustainable performance in the manufacturing sector of China. Sustainability, 16(7), 2651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Attia Aman-Ullah, Mehmood, W., Amin, S., & Abbas, Y. A. (2022). Human capital and organizational performance: A moderation study through innovative leadership. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), Article 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Budiono, K., & Ellitan, L. (2024). The efficiency and performance of Apple’s supply chain management. Ulil Albab: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chen, X. (2023). Critical success factors for a sustainable supply chain: The case of Apple Inc. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 39(1), 11–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen Xing. (2023). Critical Success Factors for a Sustainable Supply Chain: The Case of Apple Inc. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375551850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cozzolino, A., Corbo, L., & Aversa, P. (2021). Digital platform-based ecosystems: The evolution of collaboration and competition between incumbent producers and entrant platforms. Journal of Business Research, 126, 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Heracleous, L., & Papachroni, A. (2016). Strategic leadership and innovation at Apple Inc. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322271342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kodama, M. (2017). Developing holistic leadership: A source of business innovation. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/33501943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liu, H., He, G., Ma, R., & Fu, S. (2023). The impact of social capital on socially responsible supply chain performance: The moderating role of supply chain transparency. Foods, 12(19), 3624. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Maharani, S., Mehmood, S., et al. (2025). Achieving supply-chain sustainability: Enhancing resilience and organisational innovation. Journal of Operations & Supply Chain Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Podolny, J. M., & Hansen, M. T. (2020, November–December). How Apple is organized for innovation: It’s about experts leading experts. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/11/how-apple-is-organized-for-innovation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ruberti, S. (2024). Decarbonization strategies and sustainable operations at Apple Inc. Politecnico di Torino Thesis. https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/34178/1/tesi.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Suddaby, R. (2010). Construct clarity in theories of management. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Xu, H. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: Evidence from Apple Inc. Siam University e-Research. https://e-research.siam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/MBA-2024-IS-XU-Hanyuan-6317195501.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yu, Y., Xu, J., Huo, B., Zhang, Z., & Cao, Y. (2023). The impact of supply chain social responsibility on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, Article 135666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135666 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhao, W. (2024). Strategic innovations in Apple’s supply chain management: Objectives, methods, and strategies for navigating global market challenges. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 113(1), 9–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles