HomeoHub: Development of Interactive E- Module for Homeostasis and Feedback Mechanisms

Authors

Hanah Marie G. Eviota

College of Education, Mindanao State University –Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Manuel B. Barquilla

College of Education, Mindanao State University –Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Elesar V. Malicoban

College of Education, Mindanao State University –Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Joy B. Bagaloyos

College of Education, Mindanao State University –Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Nanette Hope N. Sumaya

College of Science and Mathematics, Mindanao State University –Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500855

Subject Category: Biology

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 12664-12677

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-18

Accepted: 2026-05-24

Published: 2026-06-16

Abstract

The consistently low performance of Filipino learners in both national and international assessments underscores the need to enhance instructional materials and teaching approaches in science education. This study aimed to develop and validate the HomeoHub interactive e-module for teaching homeostasis and feedback mechanisms in Biology. This study employed the first three phases of the ADDIE model—Analysis, Design, and Development—to develop and validate the HomeoHub e-module. A needs assessment was conducted among 47 Grade 11 learners and three in-service Science teachers. Results identified “Coordinated Functions of the Reproductive, Endocrine, and Nervous Systems” as the least mastered topic, particularly concepts related to homeostasis and feedback mechanisms. The HomeoHub interactive e-module was validated by experts in terms of content quality, instructional quality, technical quality, and accuracy and reliability. Pilot testing was conducted among 53 Grade 9 learners from three sections using pre-test and post-test assessments. The findings showed that the e-module obtained “Very Satisfactory” ratings in all evaluation criteria, indicating that it is valid, acceptable, curriculum-aligned, and suitable as a supplemental instructional material. Pilot testing results revealed improvement in learners' mastery levels after using the e-module. However, learners' overall mastery levels remained low. The findings suggest that the multimedia and interactive features of the e-module may support learners' conceptual understanding. Thus, the study concludes that the HomeoHub interactive e-module is a valid, acceptable, and learner-centered instructional resource with potential for classroom use. Future studies may proceed with the Implementation and Evaluation phases of the ADDIE model and employ larger, more diverse samples and experimental research designs to further examine the effectiveness of the e-module.

Keywords

Interactive E-module, Feedback mechanism

Downloads

References

1. Betio, J. M. (2025). Development of digital interactive module in teaching Science 5 at Cervantina Elementary School. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(8), 3165–3186. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0825.3051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cantere, G., & Nabua, E. (2024). Mastery level of the biology tenth graders: Basis for remedial instruction. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 4(1), 50–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Canva. (2024). Canva: Visual suite for creating graphics, presentations, and educational materials. https://www.canva.com. Retrieved April 02, 2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2015). Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Delos Santos, J. T. D., Lim, R. R., & Rogayan, D. V., Jr. (2021). Least mastered competencies in biology: Basis for instructional intervention. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 7(2), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i3.17106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education. (2009). Guidelines on the evaluation and selection of non-print instructional materials (DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2009). https://depedpines.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/6.6-Evaluation-Rating-Sheet-for-Non-Print.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. FlutterFlow. (2024). FlutterFlow: Build apps visually. https://flutterflow.io. Retrieved April 02, 2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Harahap, E. E. P., Derlina, D., & Rajagukguk, J. (2024). Development of interactive e-module based on problem solving to improve student learning outcomes. AISTEEL. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-9-2024.2353250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Magsambol, B. (2020, December). PH lowest among 58 countries in math, science – global assessment. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/filipino-students-lagging-behind-math-science-timms-international-results-2019/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Michael, J., Cliff, W., McFarland, J., Modell, H., Wright, A., & Whitescarver, S. (2009). The “core principles” of physiology: What should students understand? Advances in Physiology Education, 33(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.90139.2008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Modell, H., Cliff, W., Michael, J., McFarland, J., Wenderoth, M. P., & Wright, A. (2015). A physiologist’s view of homeostasis. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(4), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00107.2015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tarigan, W. P. L., Sipahutar, H., & Harahap, F. (2023). The impact of an interactive digital learning module on students’ academic performance and memory retention. Computers and Children, 2(2), em004. https://doi.org/10.29333/cac/13654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wulansari, K., & Irdawati, I. (2023). The effectiveness of STEM-based high school biology e-module on respiratory system material to improve student learning outcomes and creative thinking. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(5), 2649–2653. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i5-18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles