Implementing Global Citizenship Education in Zambian Secondary Schools: Challenges and Opportunities from Civic Education Teachers’ Perspectives

Global Citizenship Education (GCED) has emerged as an important educational response to globalization, democratic participation, peacebuilding, and sustainable development. In Zambia, the integration of GCED within the competence-based Civic Education curriculum presents both opportunities and implementation challenges for teachers. This study examined the challenges and opportunities experienced by Civic Education teachers in implementing GCED in selected secondary schools in Lusaka, Zambia. The study was guided by UNESCO’s Global Citizenship Education framework and informed by Transformative Learning Theory and Social Constructivist Theory. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed involving 50 Civic Education teachers drawn from five purposively selected public secondary schools. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires, while qualitative data were generated through focus group discussions and documentary analysis. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, whereas qualitative data were analysed thematically using the constant comparative method. The findings revealed that inadequate teacher training, limited teaching and learning resources, curriculum overload, examination-oriented teaching, weak institutional support, and inadequate digital infrastructure constrain the effective implementation of GCED. Despite these challenges, significant opportunities were identified through learner interest and participation, competence-based curriculum reforms, digital technologies, school-community engagement, and professional partnerships. The study further established that Civic Education provides an important platform for promoting critical thinking, civic responsibility, tolerance, peace, and global awareness among learners. The article concludes that effective implementation of GCED in Zambia requires sustained teacher professional development, improved access to instructional and digital resources, stronger policy support, and greater integration of experiential and learner-centred pedagogies. The study contributes empirical evidence to the growing scholarship on GCED implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa and provides insights for curriculum reform, teacher education, and educational policy.

Global Citizenship Education, Civic Education, curriculum implementation, teacher perspectives

1. Akkari, A., & Maleq, K. (2020). Global citizenship education: Critical and international perspectives. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 22(1), 15–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andreotti, V. (2011). Actionable postcolonial theory in education. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chung, M. S. (2014). Teaching global citizenship: Tensions between policy and practice in South Korea. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 6(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Davies, I., Evans, M., & Reid, A. (2018). Global citizenship education: A critical introduction to key concepts and debates. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Edwards Jr., D. B. (2024). Global education reform and the realities of implementation in developing contexts. Comparative Education Review, 68(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Enugu, P. (2024). Global citizenship values among African youth: Evidence from the World Values Survey. African Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 88–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ghosn-Chelala, M. (2020). Exploring sustainable learning and practice of global citizenship education in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 695–712. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Guo, L. (2014). Preparing teachers to educate for 21st century global citizenship: Envisioning and enacting. Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education, 4(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Inguaggiato, C., et al. (2025). Transformative learning and global citizenship education in contemporary classrooms. International Review of Education, 71(1), 55–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2011). Teacher education and learning for sustainable development in Africa. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Magasu, O., & Mtonga, D. (2024). Curriculum reform and global citizenship education in Zambia. Zambia Journal of Education, 9(1), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Morais, D. B., & Ogden, A. C. (2011). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 445–466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mukwacha, P. (2020). Teachers’ experiences of global citizenship education in Zimbabwean schools. Southern African Journal of Education, 40(3), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mulala, M. (2023). An exploration of how the teaching and learning of Civic Education contribute to transformative education in Zambian secondary schools (Master’s dissertation). University of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mulubale, C. (2024). Looking back and forward: A descriptive study of teachers’ proficiencies of global citizenship education in Zambia. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 11(2), 34–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Muleya, G. (2023). Promotion of Global Citizenship Education and Transformative Education for Sustainability in Zambia: Evaluation report. University of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Muleya, G., et al. (2024). Teaching and learning through global citizenship education and transformative education in the Zambian school curriculum. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(4), 211–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Parahoo, K. (1997). Nursing research: Principles, process and issues. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pittman, J. (2017). Transformative learning and global citizenship education. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 9(3), 176–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Shabalala, T., & Photo, P. (2025). Global citizenship education and curriculum implementation in African schools. African Journal of Comparative Education, 5(1), 23–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sharma, G. (2019). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 5(7), 749–752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Symeonidis, V. (2015). The status of global citizenship education in Greece and Sweden: A comparative study. Policy Futures in Education, 13(7), 881–898. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. UNESCO. (2025). Global citizenship education. https://www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. UNESCO, & APCEIU. (2020). Transformative pedagogy for learning to live together in Southern Africa. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNESCO, & Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2011). Education and skills for sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wang, Y. (2015). Global citizenship education in Chinese secondary schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(4), 485–499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wang, Y. (2021). Confucian perspectives and global citizenship education in China. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(5), 721–738. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wasilewski, A. (2019). Secondary teachers’ perceptions of global citizenship education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 112–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yoko, T. (2016). Moderating factors in global citizenship education implementation. International Education Studies, 9(11), 90–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zollinger, S. (2016). International mobility and pre-service teachers’ understandings of global citizenship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar