Intellectual Property Awareness as a Catalyst for Innovation: A Case Study of Mulungushi University

In developing economies, universities are increasingly pivotal for driving innovation-led growth. However, their potential is often constrained by a lack of strategic knowledge management capabilities, particularly in the area of Intellectual Property (IP). This study examines the effect of IP awareness on innovation within Zambian higher education, using Mulungushi University as a case study. Grounded in innovation systems and knowledge management theories, it investigates how understanding IP rights, protection, and commercialisation influences research output, technology transfer, and entrepreneurial activity. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research surveyed academic staff, researchers, and students, and conducted interviews with administrators and IP officers. The findings reveal a strong positive relationship between IP awareness and innovation outcomes, including patenting, commercialisation, startup formation, and industry collaboration. Key constraints include absent IP policies, limited training, and weak enforcement. The study concludes that integrating IP into curricula, enhancing capacity-building, and strengthening institutional support can significantly boost innovation performance in Zambian universities.

Intellectual Property Awareness; Innovation; Higher Learning Institutions; Research Commercialization; Knowledge-Based Economy; Zambia

1. Adeyeye, A. D., Jegede, O. O., & Aderemi, H. O. (2022). Intellectual property awareness and innovation performance in African universities: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(1), 158-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialisation of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35(4), 518-532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baldini, N. (2010). Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy. Technovation, 30(2), 109-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banda, C., & Mwanza, P. (2019). Barriers to research commercialisation in Zambian public universities: A policy analysis. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 678-695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2013). Proof of concept centres in the United States: An exploratory look. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 349-381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Correa, C. M. (2020). Intellectual property and development: Lessons from recent economic research. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as 'quasi-firms': The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241-263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mulenga, M., Phiri, M., & Tembo, S. (2021). Assessing the readiness for technology transfer in Zambian universities: A case study approach. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(4), 2150016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mwila, M. K. (2020). Building innovation capacity in African universities: A review of the human resource challenges. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(5), 543-555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Olanrewaju, O. I., Ojo, A. I., & Olubiyi, T. O. (2020). Barriers to intellectual property commercialization in African higher education institutions. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(5), 623-635. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'Este, P., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582-595. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Intellectual Property Organisation. (2021). World intellectual property report 2021: The global innovation divide. WIPO [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study