Industry Activities, Quality of Inaul Weaving and its Sustainability in the Barmm

This study explored the relationship between Industrial Activities, the Quality of Inaul weaving, and the Sustainability of the Inaul industry in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) using an explanatory sequential design. Sustainability, measured as the dependent variable, was examined across three dimensions: socio-cultural, economic, and environmental. The independent variables comprised Industrial Activities, covering raw materials, production, and marketing, and the Quality of Inaul weaving, assessed through stakeholder collaboration, respect for cultural traditions and natural resources, commitment to continuous process improvement, reputation, adherence to standards and procedures, and support for education and skills development. Quantitative data were first collected from weavers, retailers, and designers to determine the level of industrial activities, the perceived quality of inaul weaving and the extent of sustainability of the inaul industry. These findings were then supported and clarified through interviews that explored the lived experiences of participants. Results revealed that the Inaul weaving industry continues to operate through strong cultural persistence and community participation despite challenges on financial resources, traditional handlooms, marketing, and intermediaries. The weavers remain resilient, acknowledging these obstacles as key factors for sustainability. The quality of Inaul is sustained through skilled craftsmanship, adherence to cultural motifs, and the collective support of stakeholders. Sustainability is further reinforced by its socio-cultural significance as a source of livelihood, women empowerment, and cultural identity preservation. The qualitative results confirmed that collaboration, training, and institutional support are essential to ensure continuity of the craft. The study concludes that strengthening financial assistance, initiating formal organization or association, providing capacity-building programs, and modern marketing strategies can enhance industry activities, quality and long-term sustainability of Inaul industry in BARMM.

Inaul weaving, industry activities, product quality, sustainability, cultural heritage, traditional weaving industry, inaul industry, BARMM

1. Abdelmegeed, N., Soomro B.A, Shah N. (2022). The Role of Environment, Business and Human Behavior towards Entrepreneurial Sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2517, Pakistan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adhi, A.B & Muslim, F. (2023). Development of Stakeholder Engagement Strategies toImprove Sustainable Construction Implementation Based on Lean Construction Principles in Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia, Depok City 16424, Sustainability 2023, 15, 6053. Indonesia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agung, G., Pryanka, V., & Saskara, I. (2022). Potential Sustainability Scenarios forGringsing Weaving: How Important is Education. Institute Agama Islam Sunan Giri (INSURI) Ponorogo. Indonesia Accredited Sinta 2. DOI: 10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.3924. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al, A. (2022). Awareness, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of text-based therapy among graduate students: Cross-sectional study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 10(7), e34102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.2196/34102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alchemer, A. (2020). Researchers When Using Inclusive Demographic Questions for Surveys: Improved and Updated Questions. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research 27(4):232-255. DOI:10.24839/2325-7342.JN27.4.232. December 2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alauya, C. (2020). A preliminary study on the meranaw traditional balod 67 “tie-dye” technique in weaving. JSSH, 9, 67-87. https://doi.org/10.62071/jssh.v9i.87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Almull, M.A & Al-Rahmi, W.M. (2023). Integrated Social Cognitive Theory with LearningInput Factors: The Effects of Problem-Solving Skills and Critical Thinking Skills on Learning Performance Sustainability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3978, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alismaiel, O. A., & Crawford, J. (2022). Social media usage and acceptance in higher education: A structural equation model. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 964456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alturki, U., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2020). Integrating technology acceptance model with innovation diffusion theory: An empirical investigation on students’ intention to use e-learning systems. IEEE Access, 8, 26797–26809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971424 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Al Rahmi, W. M., Ullah, N., Alnumay, W. S., Al Zahrani, M. K., & Al Samarraie, H. (2020). Modeling cost saving and innovativeness for blockchain technology adoption by energy management. Energies, 13(18), 4783. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Kuwait Chapter), 6(11), 40–47. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://j.arabianjbmr.com/index.php/kcajbmr/article/view/1003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Aulia, D., & Ikhwana, A. (2012). The Study of weavings cultural materials diversity in Sumba. Researchgate Publication. Indonesia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ayu, I., & Saskara, N. (2023). Potential Sustainability Scenarios for Gringsing Weaving: How Important is Education. Volume 15 Number 1 (2023) January-June 2023 Page: 701-712 E-ISSN: 2656-9779 P-ISSN: 1907-6355 DOI: 10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.3924. International License (CC-BY-SA) license Published by Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri (INSURI), Ponorogo; Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Azrani, A.; Maulana, H.A. (2021). Strategi pengembangan industri kreatif kain tenun lejo sebauk pada masa pandemi COVID-19. J. Manaj. Dan Kewirausahaan. 2021, 6, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bajenting, J. (2018). Inaul: Weaving one Maguindanao.SunStarInc. Zamboanga City Cayon, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Banerjee, A. & Chakrabarti, G. (2022). The sociotechnical system of silk weaving inbishnupur region in west bengal. Journal of South Asian Development, 17(1), 108- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731741221083086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Bascoro, B., & Muslim, M. (2023). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Bazalgette P. (2017). Independent Review of the Creative Industries. UK Government (Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport).United Kingdom [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Belz, F. M., & Binder, J. K. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Biswas, V. (2013). ORB-Weaving Spiders of Bangladesh-I: Genus Araneus Clerck (Araneae: Araneidae) with Two New Species. Rec. zool. Surv. India : 113(Part-2): 169-188, 2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Bower, P.N, and Kirby, J.R. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic and semantic features of words. Theories of reading development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Brito, M., Carbone, V., & Blanquat, C. (2020). Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production Economics. Volume 114, Issue 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Crippa, L., & Moretto, A. (2019). Environmental sustainability infashion supply chains: Exploratory case-based research. International Journal of Production Economics. Volume 135, Issue 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., and Shearer, T. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing 25(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. DOI:10.1177/1744987120927206. June 2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Cavalcanti A., Smith, M. & Rodriguez, J. (2019). “Sustainability practices in traditional weaving industries of Brazil.” PhD dissertation, Federal University of Ceará, Brazil [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Charan, J., Biswas N. (2013). How to calculate sample size for different study designs inmedical research? Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 35, 2, 121-126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Chayi, P., Sima, M., & Huang, Y. (2018).. Entrepreneurship development and small business growth in rural communities. Journal of Rural Development, 38(2), 215–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2020). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Chen, B., Qian, W., Yang, Y., Liu S., & Wang, L. (2021). Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint of Cashmere Fabrics. Fibres Text. East. Eur. 2021, 29, 94–99 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Chermet & O (2020). Factors affecting the market outlet choice of bamboo culm producers.Research Gate. 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Cheng, Y., & Liang, H.-E. (2021). Calculation and evaluation of industrial carbon footprint of Cotton denim jacket. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2021, 16, 15589250211020387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Choi, T. (2020). Multi-period risk minimization purchasing models for fashion products with interest rate, budget, and profit target considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Choudhury, A. (2019). Development of Eco-labels for sustainable textiles. Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Churma, R. (2022).WEAVING WAYS: Filipino Style and Techniques. HABI, The Philippine Textile Council. November 06, 2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Dahles, P., & Susilowati, K. (2015). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Dumaraos, G. (2023). A Hopeful Future for Inaul and the Women Weavers of Teal Magazine. Theme: Elegant Magazine by AF themes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Elassy D. (2015). Environmental, social, and governance factors and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ernawati, S. (2021). Strategi pengembangan umkm tenun untuk meningkatkan social ekonomi di Kota Bima. Proc. Sem. Nas. Ek. Dan Bis. 2021, I, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Enhuber, M. (2014). How is Damien Hirst a Cultural Entrepreneur?. A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts (Volume 3, Issue 2, Summer 2014, pp. 3-20). Maastricht University, Netherlands [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Femg, Z. (2018). A World of Looms: Weaving Technology and Textile Arts, specifically regarding the classification of looms.The Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Ferasso, M.; Takahashi, A.R.W.; Gimenez, F.A.P. (2018). Innovation ecosystems: A meta-synthesis. Int. J.Innov. Sci. 2018, 10, 495–518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Fernandez, E. (2018). Celebrating the art of ‘inaul’ weaving. Daily Inquirer, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Fernandez, H. (2018). Green Marketing Orientations Toward Sustainability of Manufacturing Firms in Region XII: A Sequential Explanatory Design. Global Scientific Journals. GSJ: Volume 12, Issue 7, July 2024, Online: ISSN 2320-9186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Fitri, S. (2023). Illuminating tradition through innovation: transforming traditional woventourism in smart tourism in central lombok regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 207-220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.207-220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Fletcher, K. (2020). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Enhancing agricultural productivity sustainably. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/agr_productivity-2019-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. García, E., Machado N., & Yábar D. (2018). Modeling the Social Factors That Determine Behavior in the Community of Madrid. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2811, Madrid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Gardetti, M., & Torres, A. (2019). Sustainability in Fashion and Textiles: Values, Design, Production and Consumption. Greenleaf Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Guailel, S. (2015). Inaul Weaving Training in Maguindanao, Our Bangsa, Our Pusaka: The Gateway to a Peaceful Future. The Official Newsletter of the Burea of Cultural Heritage – ARMM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Haddad, M.I.; Williams, I.A.; Hammoud, M.S.; Dwyer, R.J. (2020). Strategies for implementing innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sust. Dev. 2020, 16, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Hakim I., (2012). The Ikat Weaving Industry in Kaderi. IHis (Indonesian Historical Studies). Indonesia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Hamner, J. (2006). Some experiences with the “contributing approach”. SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(3), 68–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. The difficulty to find skilled employment is currently felt by entrepreneurs weaving in Troso. This is because people are more interested in working in factories than in the weaving business unit. This is a bad conditions. This needs fast actions. Government assistance is expected to give a solution to solve this problem The difficulty to find skilled employment is currently felt by entrepreneurs weaving in Troso. This is because people are more interested in working in factories than in the weaving business unit. This is a bad conditions. This needs fast actions. Government assistance is expected to give a solution to solve this probleHörisch, J. (2018). The role of sustainable entrepreneurship in sustainability transitions: A conceptual synthesis against the background of the multi-level perspective. Administrative Sciences, 5(4), 286–300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci5040286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Hosseininia, G., & Ramezani, A. (2016). Factors influencing sustainable entrepreneurship insmall and medium-sized enterprises in Iran: A case study of food industry. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Huang S., Chiu A., Chao P., & Arniati A. (2019). Critical Success Factors in Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems for Sustainable Corporations. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6785. Taipei, Taiwan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Inglehart, R. F. (2020). Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Ismanto, H.; Tamrin, M.H.; Pebruary, S. Pendampingan (2018). Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Tenun Ikat Troso dalam peningkatan produktivitas dan kualitas produk kain. J. Pengab. Dan Pember. Masy. 2018, 2, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Jogulu, U.D. and Pansiri, J. (2011) "Mixed Methods: A Research Design for Management Doctoral Dissertations." Management Research Review, 34, 687-701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(23), 2276–2284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Kraft, T., Karaer, O., & Sharpe, K. (2019). Managing the Chemicals and Substances Products and Supply Chains. Springer Signature Link. Pp.313-337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Kumiawan, K. (2018). Strengthening the traditional ikat weaving industry as a local industry.Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Lampel, J., and Germain, O. (2016). Creative Industries as hubs of new Organizational and Business practices. IMP Innovation, Strategy and Sustainability.Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 7, pp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Li, W., Chow, P., Choi, T., & Chan, H. (2020). Supplier integration, green sustainability programs, and financial performance of fashion enterprises under global financial crisis. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 135, p.57-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Liton, M. (2016). Present scenario and future challenges in handloom industry in Bangladesh. Social Sciences, 5(5), 70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20160505.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Lo, C., Yeung, A., & Cheng, T. (2019). The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. Journal of Cleaner Production Economics.Volume 135, Issue2, pages 561-567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Lubis, Harista. (2004). DATOK INSTITUTE LAKSAMANA WEAVING MOTIVES OF MALAY SONGKET WEAVING IN LANGKAT: STUDY OF LOCAL WISDOM CHARACTER EDUCATION MODELS. Indonesia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Luo, B., Ahmed, S., & Long, C. (2020). Bamboos for weaving and relevant traditional knowledge in sansui, southwest china. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 16(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00418-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Macabalang, A. (2023). Inaul fabric attracts interest from foreign execs. Bulletin the Nation's Leading Newspaper. © 2023 Manila [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Manipo, RH. (2015). Weaving the word, Wording the Weave, Agung: The officialNewsletter of National Commission for Culture and the Arts, Volume XVIII, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Manuel (2018). ‘Inaul’ weaving revived in Maguindanao towns. Business Mirror, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Masyarakat (2018). Value chain analysis of Weaving industry. Research Gate, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Moretto, Macchion, Lion, Caniato, Danese, & Vinelli. (2018). Designing a roadmap towards a sustainable supply chain: A focus on the fashion industry. Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, Vicenza, Italy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Naini, U.; Dangkua, S.; Naini, W. (2020). Kerajinan tenun tradisional Gorontalo. Jambura: J. Seni Dan Desain 2020, 1, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Nieminen, E.; Linke, M.; Tobler, M. & Beke B. (2020). EU Cost Action 628: Life cycle assessment (LCA) of textile products, eco-efficiency and definition of best available technology (BAT) of textile processing. Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Volume 15, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Education for Sustainable Development: Challenges, Strategies, and Practices in a Globalizing World. DOI:10.4135/9788132108023. ISBN: 9788132102939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Nurse, S. (2022). Eksklusif Sosial Ketimpangan Pendidikan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19Melalui Kegiatan Digitalisasi Pendidikan. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 14(2), 263– 274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Ortiz, M. (2003). Art: Perception and Appreciation. Publishers Association of the Philippines Inc. (PAPI), Goodwill Trading Co., Inc. 393 Sen. Gil J. Puyat Avenue, Makati City. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Parrish, B. D. (2020). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.05.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Peng, S., Liu, J., & Geng, Y. (2022). Assessing Strategies for Reducing the Carbon Footprintof Textile Products China under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways Framework. Clim. Change. Econ. 2022, 13, 2240004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Pitt, M. and Lee, L. (2019). The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weavings Industry. Indonesia, 2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Pratama, Muh F.(2016). Ikat weaving industry and MSMEs in Bandar Kidul Village, Kediri, Indonesia. E-Journal Undip. Indonesia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Quero, M. J., & Ventura, R. (2018). Value proposition as a framework for value co-creation in crowdfunding ecosystems. Service Industries Journal, 39(15–16), 1171–1191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118772213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Qutoshi, S.B. (2018). Critical Reflective Practice as an Approach to Developing Transformative Living-theory.Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 12:107-111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. DOI:10.3126/dsaj.v12i0.22186. License. CC BY-NC 4.0. December 2018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Riffat, M. (2018). Value Chain Analysis of Weaving Industry. “International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research: The Art of Hand Weaving Textiles and Crafting on Socio-Cultural Values in Ethiopian Review"Woven Textile Crafts in Contemporary Commercial Contexts (2018) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Rini D., & Budiani S. (2018). Value chain analysis of weaving industry (Analisis rantai nilai industri tenun). Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik Vol. 31, Issue 3, 2018, page 300-309. Indonesia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Ruppert, M., Lehew M., Connel, K., & Armstrong, C. (2020). Creativity and Sustainable fashion apparel consumption the fashion detox. Journal of Cleaner Production Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Salang (2019). Sustainability factors of Yakan Weaving for Community Economic Developm-Ent. Philippine EJournals. Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Samsir, S.; Nurwati, N. (2018). Pelestarian seni budaya melalui home industry tenun Samarinda: Perspektif Sejarah Islam. El-Buhuth 2018, 1, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Saraswati, I., Saskara, I., & Setyari, N. (2023). Analisis Variabel Kunci untuk Keberlanjutan Industri Tenun Geringsing Double Ikat di Desa Pegeringsingan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 12(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i1.53598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2017). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Semuel H., Mangoting Y., & Hatane S.E. (2022). The Interpretation of Quality in the Sustainability of Indonesian Traditional Weaving. Management Department, School of Business and Management, Universitas Kristen Petra. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Seddighikhavidak S., & Jamal S. (2022). Interrelations of Ancestral Textile Handicraft Weaving and Tangible Vernacular Karkhanehs (Workspaces) in the Historic Destination of Yazd, Iran. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6363. Iran [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Setiagi & Umi (2019). Traditional weaving of Al Sadu. UNESCO Intagible Cultural Heritage.2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Siyal S., Ahmad R., Riaz S., Xin C., & Fangcheng T. (2022). The Impact of Corporate Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility: Role of Reputation and Corporate Sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10105, MDPI. Pakistan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Sofiantoro, F. & Susilowati, E. (2021). The Ikat Weaving Industry in Kediri: Characteristics and Strategies for Development, 1966-2014. Master Program of History, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro Jl. Prof. Soedarto, S. H. Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java – Indonesia. HiS (Indonesian Historical Studies) 6 (2), 107-115 © 2022 | E-ISSN: 2579-4213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Solin, A. and Curry, A. (2022). Perceived quality: In search of a definition. Research Gate. The TQM Journal 35(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Soraya, S. (2011). Child and adolescent cognitive behaviour therapy in South Africa: An editorial review. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 23(2), 69–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2011.644447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Sridharan, V.G. (2021). Methodological Insights Theory development in qualitative management control: Revisiting the roles of triangulation and generalization. Acc. Aud. Account. J. 2021, 34, 451–479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Sudarmanto, I. G. (2022). Eksistensi Tenun Gringsing Bali Dalam Era New Normal Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Comprehensive Science (JCS), 1(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.36418/jcs.v1i3.46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. Srivastava A., & Saxena A. (2022). Weaving: A Sustainable Fabric Manufacturing Technique. Journal of Sustainability and Environmental Management. (JOSEM), Vol. 1, No. 2 (2022), 299 – 305 p-ISSN 2822-1729, e-ISSN 2822-1737. Journal of Sustainability and Environmental Management (JOSEM) 299 Pattu, National Institute of Fashion Technology-Jodhpur-Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. Sun Y., Lin H.Y., & Lin R. (2022). A Pilot Study on Reproduction and Sustainable Development under the Promotion of Crafts: Taking Weaving in Taiwan as an Example. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13116. New Taipei, Taiwan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. Syaiful, Chairul, F., & Mokh, A. (2018). Business Model Canvas Analysis on Cual weaving Industry. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS REVIEW (THE JOBS REVIEW), 1 (2), 2018, 115-122 115 | The International Journal of Business Review (The Jobs Review) Vol.1 | No.2 | 2018 Bandung, Indonesia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Tekin, P., Alıcı, H., & Demirdelen T. (2024). Life Cycle Analysis of a Polyester–Wool Blended Fabric and Associated Carbon Emissions in the Textile Industry. Energies 2024, 17, 312. Turkey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Theodorou, P. (2022). The effects of urbanisation on ecological interactions. Current Opinion in Insect Science. Volume 52, August 2022, 100922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Tipps R. (2018).Systematic literature review in business and management research. Research Gate. Academy of Management Annals (Vol 12, Issue 1, pp. 83–110) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. Toks, R., (2019). The Maguindanaon cultural preservation of Inaul malong through cultural dances and programs, Sultan Kudarat State University, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. Torres Machi, C., Nasir, F., Achebe, J., Saari, R., & Tighe, S. L. (2019). Sustainability evaluation of pavement technologies through multicriteria decision techniques. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. Torres, K., Ryder, C., and Williams, H. (2019). Indigenous research methodology-weaving a research interfere. 2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. Torres, M.L, Campus, C. and Moreno, C. (2019). “Weaving” Different Knowledge Systems through Studying Salience of Wild Animals in a Dryland Area of Argentina. Volume 41, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Tur, T., Finastiian, M., Farsani, N., and Mortazir, M. (2018). Traditional Weaving House in Isfahan as a museum for promoting last-chance tourism.https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1562362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Turker,D., & Altuntas, C. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashionindustry: An analysis of corporate reports. European Management Journal. Volume 2, Issue 5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Unson, J. (2023). Business groups to help introduce Inaul fabric to international community. ©2014 NDBC NEWS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

127. Unson, J. (2018). Preps underway for Maguindanao's Inaul Festival. Philstar, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

128. Urbancová H., Hudáková M., & Fajˇcíková A. (2020). Diversity Management as a Tool of Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5020; doi:10.3390/su12125020. Czech Republic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

129. Van Kemenade, E., Van der Vlegel-Brouwer, W., & Van der Vlegel, M. (2021). Exploring the quality paradigms in integrated care: The need for emergence and reflection. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(2), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

130. Winter S., & Lasch R. (2020). Environmental and Social criteria in supplier evaluation-Lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

131. Wiratama, B. (2014). Does Social Media Strengthen the Effect of Narcissism, Envy, and Materialism on Conspicuous Consumption?. journal.unnes.ac.id. Corpus ID: 251793494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

132. Yang, Y., Shafi, M., Xia, S., & Ruo, Y. (2018). Preservation of cultural heritage embodied in traditional crafts in the developing countries. a case study of pakistani handicraft industry. Sustainability, 10(5), 1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

133. Yikang, S., His-Yen, L., & Rungtai, L. (2022). A Pilot Study on Reproduction and Sustainable Development under the Promotion of Crafts: Taking Weaving in Taiwan as an Example. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013116. China [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

134. Yilmaz, M., & Bakis, R. (2015). Sustainability in agribusiness: The role of innovation and entrepreneurship. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

136. Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Tang, Z., Liu X., & Zhang M. (2023). A Virtual Experience System of Bamboo Weaving for Sustainable Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on VR Technology. School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, Sustainability 2023, 15, 3134. China [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

137. Zuo, E., Sun, Y., Wei, W., Yuan, T., Ying, W., Sun, H., Yang, H. (2019). Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants. Science, 364(6437), 289–292. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

138. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study on Utilisation on Vidiyal Payanam with Special Reference to Udumalpet
• Influence of Sales Promotional Strategies on Water Purifier Purchase: A Study
• Voluptatem exercitat
• Beatae voluptatum eanfjnjfnjnj
• Analysis of Marketing Strategies in Newbridge College During Covid-19 Pandemic