Influence of Government Bursary Funds on Participation Rates in Public Secondary Schools in Makueni County, Kenya.
Authors
School of Education, South Eastern Kenya University Po Box 170-90200, Kitui (Kenya)
School of Education, South Eastern Kenya University Po Box 170-90200, Kitui (Kenya)
School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University Po Box 170-90200, Kitui (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200264
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 3654-3664
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-14
Accepted: 2026-02-19
Published: 2026-03-05
Abstract
Education is a dependable mechanism to improve people’s lives through the acquisition of knowledge, skills and desirable attitudes. It is therefore imperative to ensure that children are receiving equal educational opportunities regardless of circumstances out of their control such as their socioeconomic status, ethnicity, geographical location, the school they attend, or the social and economic context of the country (Demeuse, Frandiji,Greger and Rochex ,2012).The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of government bursary funds on participation rates in public secondary schools in Makueni County, Kenya. Bursary funds are a form of educational subsidies. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. The study sampled 196 principals and deputy principals out of all the 384 public secondary schools in Makueni county that were targeted for the study. All the 9 Sub-County Directors of Education in Makueni County were also targeted for the study. Sampling was done through stratified, simple random sampling. Data collection instruments included questionnaires for Principals, Deputies and interview schedule for Sub-county Directors of Education. The instruments were ascertained through piloting and by research experts to ensure content validity while reliability was achieved through piloting and testing reliability. Data was analyzed by use of SPSS version 22. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations and inferential statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data. Qualitative data was analyzed through content analysis and the responses presented in narratives, tables and figures. The results revealed that the relationship between government bursary funds and participation rates was positive but moderate (R= .679). An adjusted R2 gave a clear prediction. The adjusted R square of 0.68 indicated that 68% of the variation in the participation of students in schooling in public secondary schools in Makueni County could be explained by provision of government bursary funds in financing education. The study recommends that the government should continue and also increase bursary awards to students as a way of bolstering participation rates of students in secondary school education. This should be done by targeting the vulnerable in the society.
Keywords
Educational Subsidy, government bursary funds, Participation Rate
Downloads
References
1. Behrman,J. Sengupta,P. Todd,P. . (2005). Progressing through PROGRESA: An impact assesment of a school subsidy experiment. Washington DC: University of Pennysylvania and the International Policy Research Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bell, J. (2005). Doing your Research Project. . London: : Open University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Demeuse,M.,Frandiji,D.,Greger,D & Rochex,J,Y. . (2012). Educational policies and inequalities in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Essuman, A. (2018). The challenge of free secondary education and educational access in Ghana: A reflection on the past, realities and feasible choices. Journal of Education and Practice, 21-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Franck, E & Nicaise,I. (2022). The effectiveness of equity funding policies in schools in Europe and North America. Issues in Educational Research, 494-504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Glasure, Y. U. (2002). Does Absenteeism Matter in Academic Performance? . Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 32-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jagger, R.G & Vaithianathan, N. V. (2009). A pilot study of the prevalence of orofacial and head injuries in schoolboy cricketers at eight private schools in England and Australia. Primary dental care, 99-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kamal, A. Joel, E. C . . (2014, Dec 18). Worlds' Opinion Page. . Retrieved from http://www.Project Syndicate.org . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. KNBS. (2024). Economic Survey. Nairobi, Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lafortune,J Rothstein,J, & Schanzenbach,W.D. . (2018). School Finance Reform and the Distribution of students achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Majgaard, Kirsten, Alain & Mingat,. . (2012). Education in Sub Saharan Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Washington DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Majgaard, Kirsten, Alain & Mingat.,. (2012). Education in Sub Saharan Africa: A comparative Analysis. Washington DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Moores,E & Burgess,A. . (2023). Financial support differentially aids retention from households with lower incomes: A UK case study. Stud. High, Educ, 220-231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mugenda, M.O, & Mugenda, A. . (2009). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative . Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. NOVOC. (2009). Ministry of Gender Children and Social Welfare Government. USAID ASSIST Project. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. O'brien, D. (2018). Thinking about social mobility: A briefing paper for the weston jerwood creative bursaries programme. University of Edinburgh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. OECD. (2016). Handbook for Internationally Comperative Education Statistics. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. OECD. (2017b). The funding of school education: Connecting resources and learning. OECD Publishing, 147-151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Oketch, D. Gogo, J .O. Sika, J. O. . (2020). Equitable Allocation and Distribution of Eduction Bursary Funds in Siaya County,Kenya. African Educational Research Journal, 453-461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Oyoo, P. A, Achieng, L. Asena, J. . (2020). Influence of National Government Constituency Development Fund (NG-CDF) support on Students' enrollment in Muhoroni Constituency in Kisumu County,Kenya. Journal for Popular Education in Africa, 71-83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Rhenals,J.C & Arango,C.M. . (2022). Implementation of a pedagogical vocabulary of signs inphysical education: Apilot study. Apunt. Educ.Fis.Y Deport, 17-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sahlberg, W. (2007). Educational Policies for Raising Students Learning: The Finnish Approach. Journal of Education, 147-151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Salmi,J & D'Addio,A. . (2021). Policies for achieving inclusion in higher education. . Policy review higher education, 47-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. UNESCO, . (2021). SDG 4 Data Digest 2021. National SDG 4 Benchmarks: Fulfilling our. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. World Bank. (2006). From Schooling Access to Learning Outcomes: An Unfinished Agenda. Washington DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria