Influence of Power Dynamics on Youth Participation in Peace Building in Likoni Sub-County, Mombasa County, Kenya
Authors
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA) (Kenya)
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA) (Kenya)
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA) (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900199
Subject Category: Peacebuilding
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 2774-2785
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-19
Accepted: 2026-09-24
Published: 2026-10-06
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the influence of power dynamics on youth participation in peace building in Likoni Sub County, Mombasa County, Kenya. The study was guided by Power Theory and examined how decision making, youth representation, leadership opportunities and community governance structures influence youth participation in peace building. The study adopted a mixed methods approach and a convergent parallel research design. The target population comprised youth aged 18–35 years in Likoni Sub County, with 384 respondents targeted and 311 usable questionnaires obtained. In addition, 10 key informants were purposively selected from community peace committees, village elders, non-governmental organizations, community based organizations and local administration. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and multiple regression, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings indicated that youth were involved in decision making on community peace building issues, represented in community peace committees, given leadership opportunities and supported by community governance structures. However, unequal power relations continued to discourage meaningful youth participation in peace building. Pearson correlation analysis established a positive and statistically significant relationship between power dynamics and youth participation in peace building (r = .310, p < .001). Multiple regression analysis further showed that power dynamics had a positive and statistically significant influence on youth participation in peace building (B = .288, β = .291, t = 5.197, p < .001). The study concluded that power dynamics were critical in determining the level of youth participation in peace building in Likoni Sub County. The study recommended strengthening inclusive governance, increasing youth representation in decision making processes, providing leadership opportunities for youth, and enhancing cooperation between youth, village elders, community leaders and local administrators to promote meaningful youth participation in peace building.
Keywords
Power dynamics, youth participation, peace building, decision making, youth representation, Likoni Sub County
Downloads
References
1. African Union. (2018). Continental framework on youth, peace and security. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alexander, J. (2012). Youth participation and peacebuilding in Sierra Leone. Conciliation Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Altiok, A., Porras, P., & Lee, P. (2023). Fostering meaningful youth participation in international peacebuilding: The USIP learning agenda: An evidence review. United States Institute of Peace. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. CHRIPs. (2022). Information as a structural gatekeeper in Kenya’s security sector. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. CHRIPs. (2022). Youth, security and the right to information. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Conciliation Resources. (2012). Decentralisation and peacebuilding in Sierra Leone. In Accord Issue 23: Consolidating peace: Liberia and Sierra Leone. Conciliation Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. HAKI Africa. (2023). [Specific 2023 publication cited in the manuscript]. HAKI Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Honwana, A. (2012). The time of youth: Work, social change, and politics in Africa. Kumarian Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Institute for Security Studies. (2025). Youth agency and peacebuilding in East Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Economic survey 2024. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kenya National Youth Policy. (2019). National youth policy. Ministry of Public Service, Youth and Gender Affairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Mombasa County Government. (2022). County integrated development plan (CIDP) 2023–2027. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. National Youth Council. (2023). Annual reports and financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023. National Youth Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Peaceful Change initiative. (2024). Exploring the space for young people in peacebuilding in coastal communities of Tanzania and Kenya. Peaceful Change initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Podder, S., & Ragandang, P. C., III. (2022). Youth inclusion in peace processes: The case of the Bangsamoro Transition Authority in Mindanao, Philippines. Conflict, Security & Development, 22(6), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2022.2151201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. REINVENT Kenya. (2024). The commodification of youth in political violence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Search for Common Ground. (2022). Intergenerational trust in Mombasa: A baseline study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Simpson, G. (2018). The missing peace: Independent progress study on youth, peace and security. United Nations Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. United Nations. (2023). Youth in Africa: A demographic imperative for peace and security. United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. United Nations. (2024). Youth, peace and security: A guide. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). The Bujumbura Declaration, formulated with and for youth, is a key milestone in the Youth, Peace and Security Agenda in Africa. UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. United Nations Security Council. (2015). Resolution 2250 on youth, peace and security. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]