Influence of Students’ Awareness on Implementation of National Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy among Secondary School Students in Gucha South Sub-County, Kisii County, Kenya
Authors
Department of Curriculum Instruction and Educational Management, Egerton University (Kenya)
Department of Curriculum Instruction and Educational Management, Egerton University (Kenya)
Department of Curriculum Instruction and Educational Management, Egerton University (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0486
Subject Category: Adolescent Health
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 6645-6653
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-15
Accepted: 2026-07-20
Published: 2026-08-03
Abstract
The government of Kenya through the Ministry of Health enacted the National Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy (NASRH) in 2015 which outlines the need for Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) among adolescents. The policy is meant to inform the adolescents through the Ministry of Education on proper practices on reproductive health. Despite the implementation of this policy, there are increased incidences of unintended pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, substance and drug abuse, early marriages, harmful traditional practices, sexual and gender-based violence among secondary school students in Kenya. This study sought to determine students’ level of awareness of the implementation of NASRH policy in secondary schools in Gucha South Sub-County. The study adopted concurrent mixed method research design (QUANT+QUAL). Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics (percentages & frequencies), while qualitative data were analysed using content analysis. The results indicate that majority of the students (72.7%) agreed that their schools strive to reduce incidences of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence incidences among students. (66.4%) of the students agreed that the school had put in place measures to curb drug and substance abuse, while (65.1%) agreed with the item that the school referred them to health facilities in case they had reproductive health issues. On the other hand, (45.8%) of the students did not agree on the statement that the school trains students on sexual and reproductive health. A minority (40.8%) agreed with the statement while a small number (13.4%) sparing agreed. This is an indication that sexual and reproductive health trainings are not adequately covered in schools and hence, a majority of students are not aware of the schools’ role in enhancing sexual and reproductive health education. Therefore, the ministry of health in collaboration with the ministry of education should establish adolescent friendly centres to provide quality services on sexuality education and provide sexuality materials i.e. teaching manuals, curriculum frameworks and comprehensive sexuality education guidelines.
Keywords
MoH, MoE, NASRH policy, Awareness, Selected Factors
Downloads
References
1. Adekola, A. P., & Mavhandu-Mudzusi, A. H. (2022). Advancing sexual and reproductive health outcomes in rural schools with the use of a sexuality education enhancement model: Learners’ perspectives. Heliyon, 8(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akseer, N., Al‐Gashm, S., Mehta, S., Mokdad, A., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2017). Global and regional trends in the nutritional status of young people: A critical and neglected age group. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1393(1), 3–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Breuner, C. C., Mattson, G., Adelman, W. P., Alderman, E. M., Garofalo, R., Marcell, A. V., Powers, M. E., Upadhya, K. K., Yogman, M. W., & Bauer, N. S. (2016). Sexuality education for children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 138(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Edna, O. K. (2018). Gender perspectives of motorcycle mode of transport on male and female users in Kisii County, Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Erena, G., & Kerbo, A. A. (2015). Unwanted pregnancy and associated factors among female students of Madawalabu University Bale Zone, Oromia Region south east, Ethiopia. Science Journal of Public Health, 3(1), 50–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gutto, S. B. (2021). COVID-19 Pandemic: Awakening the Call for Paradigm Shifting in the Teaching, Learning, Research and Professional Development in Human and Peoples’ Rights, Freedoms and Responsibilities in Africa and the Rest of the World. Strathmore LJ, 5, 221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Mogere, D., & Obutu, C. (2014). Access To Sexual Reproductive Health Rights Information Among The Youth: A Case Of Gucha South District, Kisii County-Kenya. Value in Health, 17(3), A21–A22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Odii, A., Atama, C. S., Igwe, I., Idemili-Aronu, N. J., & Onyeneho, N. G. (2020). Risky sexual behaviours among adolescent undergraduate students in Nigeria: Does social context of early adolescence matter? The Pan African Medical Journal, 37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Tchounwou, P. (2004). Environmental Research and Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 1(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2004010001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Vanwesenbeeck, I., Westeneng, J., de Boer, T., Reinders, J., & van Zorge, R. (2016). Lessons learned from a decade implementing Comprehensive Sexuality Education in resource poor settings: The World Starts with Me. Sex Education, 16(5), 471–486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Sullivan, Y. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Venkatesh, V., Brown, SA, and Sullivan, YW “Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-Methods Research: An Extension and Illustration,” Journal of the AIS (17: 7), 435–495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fernández, M., Martínez-Román, R., Carrera-Fernández, M. V., & Rodríguez-Castro, Y. (2021). Sex education in the spotlight: What is working? Systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Vanusha, A., & Parvathavarthini, K. (2018). Assessment of present awareness on reproductive health and evaluation of a tool designed for reproductive health education among school going adolescent girls. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7(6), 2381–2388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Nassiuma, D. K. (2000). Survey sampling: Theory and methods. Egerton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]