Influence of Teachers’ Accountability on Learners’ Learning Engagement
Authors
San Vicente Elementary School Department of Education (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200025
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 256-266
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-03
Accepted: 2026-02-09
Published: 2026-02-21
Abstract
Teacher accountability plays a vital role in promoting learners’ academic engagement. This study examined the relationship between teachers’ accountability and learners’ learning engagement among Grades 1 to 6 pupils at Lupiagan Elementary School during the School Year 2023–2024. Specifically, it assessed teachers’ accountability in terms of duty and responsibility, communication, and expectations, as well as learners’ engagement in oral recitation and participation in performance tasks. A descriptive–correlational research design was employed. Data were collected from 124 learners using a modified questionnaire adapted from Dargusch (2018). Mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s r were used for data analysis.
Keywords
teacher accountability, learning engagement, duty and responsibility, communication
Downloads
References
1. Abah. (2023). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. The World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Dehdradon. (2023). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Demas, A., & Arcia, G. (2019). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Desimone, L. (2021). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ehindero, S., & Ajibade. (2019). Teacher evaluations and professional development: How do teacher evaluation methods correlate with reported professional development support for teachers? Educational Policy, 29(1), 3–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ferdig, R. (2020). Virtual schooling standards and best practices for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 479–503. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Folger, R. (2020). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Manalo, F. (2020). Secondary teachers' preparation, challenges, and coping mechanisms in the pre-implementation of distance learning in the new normal. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(3), 144–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. McCarthy, & Cater. (2020). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Nkedishu. (2021). Teacher quality and educational equality: Do teachers with higher standards-based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps? Education Policy Analysis Archives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Randolf. (2021). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ruiz. (2022). Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909–949. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Saunders, & Mills. (2019). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Sng Bee. (2020). Does student sorting invalidate value-added models of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 298–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Wellie. (2021). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267–271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Yuan, F. (2021). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria