Innovation as Stewardship: Creation Theology and Sustainable Product Development
Authors
1School of Graduate Studies (Ghana)
1School of Graduate Studies (Ghana)
1School of Graduate Studies (Ghana)
Valley View University (Ghana)
1School of Graduate Studies (Ghana)
1School of Graduate Studies (Ghana)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100331
Subject Category: Business
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 4274-4285
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-22
Accepted: 2026-01-28
Published: 2026-02-05
Abstract
Growing environmental pressures have intensified calls for innovation that supports sustainable development, yet innovation itself can also increase consumption and ecological strain. This study examines innovation as stewardship by bringing creation theology into dialogue with sustainable product development. Using a conceptual desk review approach, the paper synthesises scholarly literature on innovation, sustainability, and business development alongside theological and biblical interpretations of creation and stewardship. The analysis shows that sustainable product development is most effective when social and environmental considerations are integrated from the earliest stages of design, material selection, and production. It also highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and organisational capabilities in sustaining responsible innovation over time. From a theological perspective, the study argues that innovation reflects human responsibility as stewards of creation and must therefore be guided by restraint, accountability, and care rather than novelty or growth alone. The paper contributes to sustainability and innovation discourse by framing innovation as a moral practice and offering stewardship as a guiding principle for responsible product development and long term ecological wellbeing.
Keywords
Innovation; Stewardship; Sustainable Product Development; Creation Theology; Sustainability
Downloads
References
1. Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Karpen, I. O., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2024). Responsible design thinking for sustainable development: Critical literature review, new conceptual framework, and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 195(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05600-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Correggi, M., & Ates, A. (2024). Sustainable dynamic capabilities: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3901 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Diaz, A., Schöggl, J.-P., Reyes, T., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2021). Sustainable product development in a circular economy: Implications for products, actors, decision-making support and lifecycle information management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. de Medeiros, J. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Cortimiglia, M. N. (2022). Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Jalo, H., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2024). Effect of user resistance on the organizational adoption of extended reality technologies: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Information Management, 75, 102731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Khaw, K.-L., Goh, Y. W., & Sam, A. R. M. (2022). Emotional reactions to change and reactions to change: A systematic review and future research agenda. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Maseno, P. L., & Mamati, L. B. (2021). Stewardship and sustainability: Towards a theology of ecological responsibility. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77(2), a6840. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.6840 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Mengistu, A. T., Dieste, M., Panizzolo, R., & Biazzo, S. (2024). Sustainable product design factors: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 463, 142260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Włoch, R., Meyer, M., & Malinowska, K. (2025). The cost of AI: How fear of automation affects vulnerable workers. Technology in Society, 81, 102782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102782 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
- A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
- India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
- Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
- Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits