IJRISS Logo

Innovation of Teachers and Initiatives of School Heads in the Implementation of Reading Program

Authors

Lizzanne Kate B. Padilla

Bukidnon State University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500450

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 6730-6749

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-11

Accepted: 2026-05-16

Published: 2026-06-04

Abstract

This study explored how innovative instructional practices and leadership initiatives contribute to improving learners’ reading comprehension. It focused on the experiences and perspectives of Junior High School English teachers in a school within the Division of Bukidnon, particularly in implementing reading strategies and programs aligned with institutional goals. The research employed a qualitative design using a hermeneutical approach, which emphasizes interpreting the deeper meanings behind participants’ experiences and interactions. A purposive sampling technique was used to select key informants, specifically Junior High School English teachers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and insights. Findings revealed three major themes: Strategic Prioritization of Reading, Systematic Instructional Governance, and Enabling and Supportive Leadership Culture. These themes highlight the importance of structured planning, coordinated instructional support, and a positive leadership environment in promoting effective reading instruction. Despite challenges such as limited resources, time constraints, and diverse learner needs, the study found that the collaborative efforts of teachers and school leaders significantly enhance reading comprehension outcomes. The use of innovative teaching strategies, contextualized learning materials, and collaborative practices was shown to improve learner engagement and deepen understanding. In conclusion, fostering reading success requires a strong partnership between teacher innovation and supportive school leadership. The study recommends strengthening instructional supervision, promoting continuous professional development, and ensuring adequate resource provision to sustain effective reading programs and improve overall literacy outcomes among learners.

Keywords

Reading Comprehension, Teacher Innovation, Instructional Leadership, Qualitative Research, Thematic Analysis

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Abella, J., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Tañiza, F. N., Groenewald, E., & Cordova, N. Jr. (2024). Literacy leadership in elementary schools: The connections between principal practices and reading performance. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education, 4(1), 15–28. https://www.excellenciapub.com/2024/04/ejournal-Vol4-Iss1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agusalim, S. R., Sayidiman, S., & Nurhaedah, N. (2022). Application of the SQ3R method to improve reading comprehension skills of fourth grade elementary school students in Takalar Regency. Pinisi Journal of Education, 2(2), 100–110. ojs.unm.ac.id [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alcayde, K. P., & Basilan, M. L. J. C. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of the challenges and strategies in supporting students with reading difficulties. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(12), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v5i12.7580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bachtiar, R. A., Juhana, D., & Pratiwi, R. (2024). Empowering literacy through sociocultural lenses: The impact of guided reading model. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/11382700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Basmai, A. A., & Trisno, B. (2021). The relationship between vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 45–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Basmai, I., & Trisno, E. (2022). Correlation between students’ vocabulary mastery and their reading comprehension: A study in grade 10 of junior high school in SMAN 1 Junjung Sirih. Journal of English Language Teaching (JELT), 11(3), 1–10. https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/118342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2022). Education reform and learning outcomes in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 101(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bus, A. G., Shang, Y., & Roskos, K. (2024). Does in-school independent reading make a difference? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 44–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231220388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Caraig, R., & Quimbo, M. (2020). Contextualized teaching strategies and student engagement in reading. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(3), 12–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Caraig, R., & Quimbo, M. A. T. (2022). Assessing reading comprehension difficulties in core science subjects of senior high school students in a private school in Calamba City, Philippines. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(1), 1–15. https://ijci.net/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ceyhan, S., & Yıldız, M. (2021). The effect of interactive reading aloud on student reading comprehension, motivation, and fluency. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 421–431. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chen, C. (2019). Effects of metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chen, H. F. (2024). Using think-aloud strategies to enhance reading comprehension among junior high school learners in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 21(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.6210/TJTESOL.2024.21.1.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Day, S., Hwang, J. K., Arner, T., McNamara, D., & Connor, C. (2024). Choose your own adventure: Interactive e-books to improve word knowledge and comprehension skills. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02496. arxiv.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dela Cruz, M., & Javier, R. (2021). Socioeconomic factors affecting reading comprehension among Filipino learners. Journal of Educational Studies, 9(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Division Memorandum No. 24, s. 2020. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/division-memorandum-no-24-s-2020/247815607?utm_ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dorigo, J. P. (2023). Reading comprehension skills through scaffolding strategies of Grade 7 students. East African Scholars Journal of Education, Humanities and Literature, 6(1), 23–30. https://www.easpublisher.com/get-articles/3644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Dorigo, M. (2020). Scaffolding strategies in reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(4), 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gonzales, R., & Ramos, L. (2020). Parental involvement and student literacy development. Philippine Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 78–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hizam, S. M., Akter, H., Sentosa, I., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Digital competency of educators in the virtual learning environment: A structural equation modeling analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.08927. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hizam, S. M., et al. (2021). Digital tools and student engagement in reading. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 123–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Iswahyudi, M. S., Yuliana, A., & Farida, F. (2023). School principal leadership and innovation in junior high school curriculum development. Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 4(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJEM.042.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Liando, M. R., Inkiriwang, F. I., & Rotty, V. N. J. (2022). Improving the ability to read fiction texts through learning methods Survey Question Read Recite Review (SQ3R) for Adventist middle school students UNKLAB Airmadidi. European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science, 5, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Liando, N., et al. (2018). SQ3R strategy and reading comprehension improvement. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(5), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Longani, A., & Das, S. (2020). Gamification in reading instruction. Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 89–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Longani, K. D., & Das, P. Y. (2021). A study on innovative teaching and learning process during Covid-19. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(10), 4705–4712. https://www.tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/3355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ludewig, U., Decristan, J., & Pant, H. A. (2022). Decline in reading achievement due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reading and Writing, 35(5), 987–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10132-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ludewig, U., et al. (2022). COVID-19 and reading achievement decline. Educational Research Review, 35, 100–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Moon, R. C., & Kwan, S. H. (2022). Improving students’ intensive reading ability by using Survey-Question-Read-Review-Recite-Reflect method. JELITA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 3(1), 12–21. jurnal.inkadha.ac.id [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Moon, T., & Kwan, J. (2019). Structured reading strategies in classroom instruction. Reading Psychology, 40(5), 423–445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Muzammil, L., & Saifullah. (2021). The effectiveness of scaffolding strategy in reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(4), 789–796. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1204.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Muzammil, M., & Saifullah, M. (2020). Impact of reading strategies on comprehension skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(2), 215–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Nurhayati, D. A. W., & Fitriana, M. W. (2020). A study of the students’ reading competency in the junior high school based on the 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Language and Literature, 4(1), 10–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nurhayati, D., & Fitriana, Y. (2020). Teacher adaptability in reading instruction. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 55–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ocampo, D., & Tosino, M. (2021). Reading strategies and comprehension among secondary students. Philippine Journal of Education, 100(2), 23–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Pastera, J. M. R., Gaitano, J. H., & Martir, E. M. (2024). Learners’ reading strategies and comprehension skills. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 7(5), 54–70. https://www.ijsmsjournal.org/ijsms-v7i5p104.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Pastera, N., et al. (2022). Differentiated instruction in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 15(3), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Pocaan, J., et al. (2021). Instructional leadership and reading program implementation. Journal of School Leadership, 31(4), 367–389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Pocaan, J. M., Bailon, L. L., & Pocaan, J. P. T. (2022). Strategic reading intervention for left-behind learners in the Philippines. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.5087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Pocaan, J. M., Bailon, L. L., & Pocaan, J. P. T. (2022). Teaching remedial reading: Content area teachers’ difficulties and needs. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pravitasari, D., & Nurfadillah, S. (2021). Vocabulary development and reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching, 6(1), 14–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Pravitasari, H., & Nurfadillah, L. (2025). Correlation between students’ vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension at junior Islamic school. EDUCASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 55–68. https://educasia.or.id/index.php/educasia/article/view/296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Ravi, P., Varner, E., Zhang, M., & Reich, J. (2023). Understanding teacher perspectives and experiences after deployment of AI literacy curriculum in middle-school classrooms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04839. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Rezkimedia. (2022). Teachers’ challenges, capabilities, and needs in teaching learners with reading difficulties. Journal of Science and Education, 3(2), 112–119. https://jse.rezkimedia.org/index.php/jse/article/view/173Ripaldi, A., et al. (2020). Technology integration in literacy instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 2105–2123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Ripaldi, D., Pujiawati, E., & Al-Baekani, A. (2021). Gamification strategy: A word puzzle game for teaching vocabulary. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJER.113.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Saputra, D. G., & Haddar, G. A. (2024). Enhancing reading comprehension in education: A study on the effectiveness of the SQ3R method. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 13(3), 167–179. journals.ristek.or.id [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Saputra, H., & Haddar, G. (2019). Effectiveness of SQ4R method in reading comprehension. Journal of Education, 11(2), 98–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Simanungkalit, A. G., & Tombeng, J. E. (2022). Students' vocabulary mastery and their reading comprehension at the selected private junior high school in Airmadidi. SUMIKOLAH: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(1), 1–10. ejournal.unklab.ac.id [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Simanungkalit, M., & Tombeng, E. (2020). Vocabulary mastery and comprehension skills. Journal of English Teaching, 6(2), 77–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school 23–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Tudtud, L. F., Ceniza, A. M. B., Fernandez, A., & Ignacio, J. T. (2022). Barriers to the reading comprehension of public junior high school students. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 5(5), 256–260. https://www.ijsmsjournal.org/ijsms-v5i5p120.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Valenzuela, E. (2021). Education inequality and learning outcomes in the Philippines. World Bank Policy Review, 12(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles