Institutional Bystanding: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Support Gaps for Deaf/Hard of Hearing Students in Ghanaian Higher Education

Despite growing policy commitments to inclusive education, deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) students in Ghanaian higher education institutions continue to encounter significant barriers to full academic participation. National policies such as the Inclusive Education Policy (2015) and the Persons with Disability Act (2006) formally promote equitable access to education. However, empirical studies consistently show that the implementation of these policies within universities remains uneven. DHH students frequently experience shortages of sign language interpreters, inaccessible teaching materials, limited lecturer preparedness for inclusive pedagogy, and fragmented institutional support systems. Existing explanations for these barriers often emphasise resource constraints, institutional capacity limitations, or weaknesses in policy implementation. While these factors are important, they do not fully explain why accessibility gaps persist even when institutional actors recognise the needs of students with disabilities. This paper proposes a conceptual framework of Institutional Bystanding (IB) to explain patterns of organisational inaction within higher education systems. Drawing on insights from the Bystander Effect in social psychology and Critical Disability Theory, the paper argues that accessibility gaps may arise when responsibility for responding to students’ needs becomes diffused across multiple institutional actors. Within such environments, lecturers, administrators, and support units may assume that other actors are responsible for providing accommodations, misinterpret collective inaction as evidence that intervention is unnecessary, or hesitate to act due to uncertainty about institutional expectations. The proposed framework identifies the interaction between structural conditions, including policy ambiguity, fragmented administrative structures, limited accessibility resources, and weak accountability systems, and psychological mechanisms such as diffusion of responsibility, pluralistic ignorance, and evaluation apprehension. Together, these factors can produce Institutional Bystanding, resulting in delayed accommodations, inconsistent accessibility practices, and increased reliance on student self-advocacy. The framework offers a theoretical lens for understanding accessibility gaps and highlights the need for structural reforms that clarify responsibility and strengthen institutional accountability for disability inclusion.

Institutional bystanding, Higher education inclusion, Bystander effect

1. Abugre, J. B. (2017). Institutional governance and management systems in Sub-Saharan Africa higher education: Developments and challenges in a Ghanaian research university. Higher Education, 75(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0141-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adade, R., Appau, O., Mprah, W. K., Fobi, D., Marfo, P. S., & Atta-Osei, G. (2022). Factors influencing sign language interpretation service in Ghana: The interpreters’ perspective. Journal of Interpretation, 30(1), 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agbenyega, J. S., Tamakloe, D., Klibthong, S., & Jibar, H. (2023). A study of Ghanaian inclusive basic school teachers’ perspectives and uses of research evidence in pedagogical practice. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231216575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Akoto, Y., Nketsia, W., Opoku, M. P., Owusu, M. F., & Opoku, E. K. (2022). Applying a socio-ecological model to understand the psychosocial support services available to students with disabilities in universities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.7237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amponsah, S., van Wyk, M. M., & Thomas, M. (2024). Supporting visually impaired students in virtual learning environments in Ghana. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241262484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Atuahene, F., & Owusu-Ansah, A. (2013). A descriptive assessment of higher education access, participation, equity, and disparity in Ghana. SAGE Open, 3(3), 2158244013497725. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bartolo, P. A., Borg, M., Callus, A., Gaetano, A. D., Mangiafico, M., D’Amato, E. M., Sammut, C., Vidal, R. V., & Vincent, J. (2023). Aspirations and accommodations for students with disability to equitably access higher education: A systematic scoping review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1218120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Borthakur, D., Crockett, L., Mihalchan, J., Swann, J. M., & Saikia, M. J. (2026). Empowering bystanders: A psychological and institutional model for intervention in academic bullying. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1650438. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1650438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cambon, L., Terral, P., & Alla, F. (2019). From intervention to interventional system: Towards greater theorization in population health intervention research. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6663-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fadlallah, K. J., Asmar, M. K., & Yérétzian, J. (2025). Disability in Lebanese higher education: Unveiling students’ experiences. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1645115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fobi, D. (2021). Role of interpreting in the inclusion of deaf students in tertiary education in Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Goodall, G., Mjøen, O. M., Witsø, A. E., Horghagen, S., & Kvam, L. (2024). Breaking a vicious cycle: The reproduction of ableism in higher education and its impact on students with disabilities. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1504832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 28(5), 631–644. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Goodwin, E. C., Pais, D., He, J., Gin, L. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2024). Perspectives from undergraduate life sciences faculty: Are we equipped to effectively accommodate students with disabilities in our classrooms? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-05-0094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Guo, P., & Wang, Z. (2025). Implementation fidelity of universal design for learning and effects on student achievement, engagement and belonging. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 45430. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30079-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hartman, M. C., Smolen, E. R., & Powell, B. (2023). Curriculum and instruction for deaf and hard of hearing students: Evidence from the past—considerations for the future. Education Sciences, 13(6), 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hassard, J., Yildrim, M., Thomson, L., & Blake, H. (2024). Disclosing non-visible disabilities in educational workplaces: A scoping review. British Medical Bulletin, 150(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldae004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. (2004). The bystander effect: A lens for understanding patterns of participation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1302_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kendall, L. (2017). Supporting students with disabilities within a UK university: Lecturer perspectives. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1299630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kim, H.-S., Hwang, H., Gwak, S., Yoon, J., & Park, K. (2024). Improving communication and promoting social inclusion for hearing-impaired users: Usability evaluation and design recommendations for assistive mobile applications. PLoS ONE, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kioupi, V., Nawire, A. W., Musungu, S., Nzuve, F., & Giannopoulos, G. A. (2023). Policy and practice on inclusive higher education in the UK and Kenya. Sustainability, 15(18), 13540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Latané, B., & Nida, S. A. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89(2), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.89.2.308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Levesque, E., & Duncan, J. (2024). Inclusive education for deaf students: Pass or fail. Deafness & Education International, 26(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2024.2341573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Levitt, J. M., Thelwall, M., & Moreira, F. F. (2023). Identifying disability-related barriers to academic employment. Studies in Higher Education, 49(11), 2104–2119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2290634 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mantey, E. E. (2019). Beyond the politics of inclusion: The policy environment and the fate of children with disability in the Ghanaian educational system. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 10(5), 54– [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2019-0066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ministry of Education (2015). Inclusive education policy. Government of Ghana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Murtadlo, M., Albana, H., Nisa, Y. F., Izazy, N. Q., Sumiati, N. T., Dewi, M., Abdullah, H., & Chinhara, H. (2025). Inclusive education in Africa: Transforming higher education in low-income countries. Scientific African, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02708 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Naami, A., & Mort, K. S. (2023). Inclusive education in Ghana: How prepared are the teachers? Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1056630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nakua, E., Yarfi, C., & Ashigbi, E. (2017). Wheelchair accessibility to public buildings in the Kumasi metropolis, Ghana. African Journal of Disability, 6(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nel, M., Hay, J. F., Bekker, T., Beyers, C., Pylman, N., Alexander, G., & Matoti, S. N. (2023). Exploring the perceptions of lecturers and final year students about the infusion of inclusion in initial teacher education programmes in South Africa. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1024054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nieminen, J. H. (2022). Unveiling ableism and disablism in assessment. Higher Education, 85(3), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00857-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nketekete, M., & Mojalefa, M. L. (2021). Exploring open and distance learning reform at the National University of Lesotho. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(4), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.6283 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Opoku, M. P., Nketsia, W., & Mohamed, A. H. (2022). The self-efficacy of private school teachers toward the implementation of inclusive education in Ghana. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.985123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Oppong, A. M., Adu, J., Fobi, D., & Acheampong, E. K. (2018). Academic experiences of students who are deaf at the University of Education, Winneba, Ghana. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Oswal, N., Al-Kilani, M. H., Faisal, R., & Fteiha, M. (2025). A systematic review of inclusive education strategies for students of determination in higher education institutions. Education Sciences, 15(5), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ristad, T., Østvik, J., Horghagen, S., Kvam, L., & Witsø, A. E. (2023). A multi-stakeholder perspective on inclusion in higher education: Ruling on fragile ground. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, 100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Samian, S. S., Rohani, R., Ahyan, N. A., Jambari, H., & Seth, N. H. N. (2025). Teaching deaf students in Polytechnic Malaysia: Identifying constraints faced by educators. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Schillemans, T., Overman, S., Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Fredriksson, M., Lægreid, P., Maggetti, M., Papadopoulos, Y., Rübecksen, K., Rykkja, L. H., Salomonsen, H. H., Smullen, A., & Wood, M. J. A. (2020). Understanding felt accountability. Governance, 34(3), 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Swanwick, R., Oppong, A. M., Offei, Y. N., Fobi, D., Appau, O., Fobi, J., & Mantey, F. F. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on deaf adults, children and their families in Ghana. Journal of the British Academy, 8, 141–165. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/008.141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tannenbaum-Baruchi, C., Ha’am, B. A., & Harari, R. (2025). Accessibility and support in higher education: A case study of deaf and hard of hearing students’ perceptions. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01586-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Vanderpuye, I., Obosu, G. K., & Nishimuko, M. (2018). Sustainability of inclusive education in Ghana. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(14), 1527–1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1544299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wertans, E., & Burch, L. (2022). It’s backdoor accessibility: Disabled students’ navigation of university campus. Journal of Disability Studies in Education, 3(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888803-bja10013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Wray, M., & Houghton, A. (2018). Implementing disability policy in teaching and learning contexts. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(4), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1491838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Structured Teaching Approaches to Improve Vocational Skill Proficiency for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Technical and Vocational Education: A Literature Review.
• Barriers to Inclusive Education: A Comprehensive Review of Institutional, Pedagogical, and Socio-Cultural Challenges
• Opportunities and Challenges on Inclusive Synergy among Schools and Local Governance: Basis for a Proposed Inclusive School–Local Governance Collaboration Framework