Institutional Readiness for Digital Transformation in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Digital transformation has become a strategic priority in higher education, particularly in engineering education, where technological innovation, Industry 4.0, and digital competencies are essential for preparing future professionals. However, the successful implementation of digital transformation initiatives depends largely on an institution’s readiness to adapt organizationally, technologically, and strategically. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to examine institutional readiness for digital transformation in engineering education by identifying the factors that influence readiness, the challenges and barriers encountered, and the strategies, frameworks, and best practices proposed to enhance readiness. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework and Kitchenham Guidelines, the review employed a systematic search using Lens.org, with studies screened and managed through Zotero and Rayyan.ai. From an initial pool of 5,636 records, a rigorous screening, eligibility assessment, and quality evaluation process resulted in 19 studies being included in the final qualitative synthesis. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, narrative synthesis, and bibliometric analysis. The findings revealed that institutional readiness is primarily influenced by leadership and governance, technological infrastructure, faculty competencies and digital literacy, organizational culture, and institutional support. The review also identified key barriers, including infrastructure limitations, digital competency gaps, resistance to change, resource constraints, and organizational challenges. Furthermore, effective strategies for enhancing readiness include digital leadership and strategic planning, faculty development and capacity building, readiness assessment frameworks, technology integration, and stakeholder collaboration. Overall, the findings suggest that institutional readiness for digital transformation is a multidimensional construct that requires the alignment of technological, organizational, human, and strategic dimensions. This review contributes to the growing body of knowledge on digital transformation in engineering education and provides evidence-based insights for policymakers, institutional leaders, educators, and researchers seeking to strengthen institutional preparedness and support sustainable digital transformation initiatives.

institutional readiness, digital transformation, engineering education, organizational readiness, technology integration, education 4.0, higher education institutions

1. Ahmed, V., & Opoku, A. (2022). Technology supported learning and pedagogy in engineering education: A case study of preparedness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 365–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10706-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anastasakis, M., Karakos, A., & colleagues. (2023). Undergraduates’ barriers to online learning during emergency remote teaching. Education and Information Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09584-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Caprara, L., & Caprara, C. (2022). Effects of virtual learning environments: A scoping review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3683-3722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10768-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cobian, K., et al. (2022). Implementing case study design and evaluation frameworks in STEM education. Journal of STEM Education Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.20507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elçi, A., & Abubakar, A. M. (2021). Configurational effects of task–technology fit and motivation on technology adoption in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10580-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eppard, J., Nasser, O., & Reddy, P. (2021). EdTech culturation: Integrating culturally relevant pedagogy in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.6.2065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guppy, N., Verpoorten, D., Boud, D., Lin, Y., Tai, J., Bartolic, S., et al. (2022). Teaching and learning under COVID-19: Technology usage and lockdown experiences in higher education. Higher Education, 84(3), 487–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00781-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hasim, M. S., et al. (2022). E-learning antecedents, digital readiness, and usage behaviour among higher education students. Education and Information Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Highman, L., et al. (2023). Strategic partnerships and institutional capacity building in higher education. Higher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11233-023-09123-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering(Version 2.3, EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, and Department of Computer Science, University of Durham. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Klusmann, B., Trippenzee, M., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Sanderman, R., & Schroevers, M. J. (2022). Providing emergency remote teaching: What are teachers' needs and what could have helped them to deal with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic? Teaching and Teacher Education, 118, 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kovacs, H., Tinoca, L., & Pásztor-Kovács, A. (2023). Teaching under lockdown: Understanding the social practice of teaching during educational disruption. Higher Education, 85, 739–757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00863-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lai, J., Bower, M., Wong, L. H., & colleagues. (2022). A comprehensive evaluation framework for technology use in education. Education and Information Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10986-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: A divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(51). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Page et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pham, T., et al. (2021). CDIO-based approaches for teacher training and digital competency development. European Journal of Engineering Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Purwandari, B., et al. (2022). Exploring the Community of Inquiry framework in engineering education e-learning environments. Education and Information Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15135a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sum, M., & Oancea, A. (2022). The use of technology in higher education teaching by academics during the COVID-19 emergency remote teaching period: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(59). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00364-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tang, Y., et al. (2021). Student online learning readiness during COVID-19: Factors influencing higher education outcomes. Education and Information Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tran, L. T., et al. (2023). COVID-19, geopolitics and risk management: Towards framing a reciprocal, coordinated, responsive and sustainable international education future. Higher Education Research and Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14782103231163480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]