Instructional Skills and Work-Based Performance of Junior High School Mathematics Teachers: Basis for Strategic Intervention Plan

Authors

Rhea Jane T. Tangalin

Faculty of the Graduate School Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science and Technology the Degree Master of Arts in Teaching Major in Mathematics (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800389

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 5964-5994

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-20

Accepted: 2026-08-25

Published: 2026-09-06

Abstract

Mathematics education plays a vital role in developing learners' critical thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills. Despite the implementation of various instructional innovations and educational reforms, improving students' mathematics achievement remains a continuing challenge. This highlights the need to strengthen teachers' instructional competencies, as effective teaching is a key factor in promoting meaningful learning and improving educational outcomes.

Keywords

In response to this gap, this study examined the instructional skills

Downloads

References

1. Apus, J., & Quirap, E. (2024). Factors affecting mathematics performance: Basis for an intervention plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i04-11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Borabo, J., & Dio, R. V. (2025). Effectiveness of strategic intervention material (SIM) in improving Filipino students’ performance in science andmathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Basic Education Research, 6(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v6i2.1420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boye, E. S., & Agyei, D. D. (2023). Effectiveness of problem-based learning strategy in improving teaching and learning of mathematics for pre-service teachers in Ghana. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), Article 100453.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bundang, M., & Parangat, K. (2022). Teacher-made strategic intervention materials for students with learning difficulties in Mathematics 8 in the Philippines. International Journal of Advances in Interdisciplinary Research, 2, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Campilla, J., & Castañaga, V. A. (2021). Teaching strategies utilized by mathematics teachers in the 21st-century. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 59(2), 140–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cayud-Ong, F., & Futalan, M. C. (2024). Mathematics teachers’ strategies for improving students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cruz, C. E. (2024). The effectiveness of Individual Performance Commitment Review Form as an evaluation tool to improve teachers’ performance: Basis for technical assistance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(2), 724–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.02.30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Daisy, D. L., & de Guzman, M. F. D. (2021). Strategic intervention material: A learning approach in teaching economics during distance education. International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends, 8(5), 76–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dimou, E. (2021). Systematic review of the effectiveness of intervention strategies for teaching mathematicsto secondary school students. OALib, 8(5), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107392Flores, L. A., Cunanan, A. F. F., Serminio, R. J. E., [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mercurio, S. C., & Miguel, M. R. S. (2024). Evaluating Grade 7 students’ performance in integer operations: Basis for strategic intervention material development. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, XI(VII), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2024.1107049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Burgos, E. H., & Meer, T. Q. (2021). Determinants affecting the Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) in relation to work satisfaction among elementary teachers of Iba District, Division of Zambales, Philippines. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Topics, 2(7), 116–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Legal, F. (2025). Effectiveness of the Mathematics Enhancement Tool: A strategic intervention material to teaching fractions among Grade 4 students ofOsmeña Colleges. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 3(2), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.17613/59fhh-y9j19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Licayan, . H., & Arroyo, R. A. (2025). Instructional competence and its impact on the performance of public junior high school Technology and Livelihood Education teachers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(V), 75–101.https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90500010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mancera, S. P. (2021). Effectiveness of interactive strategic intervention materials (SIM) to the performance of Grade 6 pupils in mathematics. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 241–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Parcon, B. S., Alum, J. G., Nilong, D. J. B., Maulana,S. S., Manalao, A. M., Miagar, N. A., Arenas, J. C., & Cabotaje, J. P. N. (2025). Teachers’ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. performance and experiences: An explanatory mixed method design in Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form compliance. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(8), Article 2025365.https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Peña, R. M. J. L. D., & Doronio, R. G. (2025). Anexperimental study on mathematics teaching strategies and academic performance of students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(VII), 1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90700097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Peteros, E., Gamboa, A., Etcuban, J. O., Dinauanao, A., Sitoy, R., & Arcadio, R. (2019). Factors affecting mathematics performance of junior high school students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), Article em0556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Resposo, R. B. (2024). Exploring the implementation of strategic intervention materials: Basis for policydevelopment. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 1–2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sabio, C., & Manalo, M. (2020). Assessing elementary school teachers’ performance using CBPAST and IPCR: A five-year trajectory report. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 154–158.https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.2.1355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Salviejo, E. I., Aranes, F. Q., & Espinosa, A. A. (2014). Strategic intervention material-based instruction, learning approach, and students’ performance in chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 2(1), 91–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Segarino, G. M., Labisig, J., Calmerin, L., & Cabello,C. (2022). SIMs as intervention in enriching the teaching of fundamental operations in mathematics: An action research. Psychology and Education: AMultidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7162173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yazon, A. D., & Leonano, A. V. (2019). Effectiveness of mathematics intervention program (MIP) among primary school teachers. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.52.729747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles