Intangible Cultural Heritage and Social Media Research: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

Wang Xiaojing

Department of Multimedia Creative, Faculty of Art and Industry Creative, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Balamuralithara Balakrishnan

Department of Multimedia Creative, Faculty of Art and Industry Creative, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400583

Subject Category: Social Media

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 8237-8249

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-24

Accepted: 2026-04-29

Published: 2026-05-19

Abstract

With the development of digital technologies, mobile Internet, and platform-based media, social media has become an important space for the dissemination, presentation, interaction, and revitalisation of intangible cultural heritage. Although existing studies have continued to increase, their research themes, methodological approaches, and knowledge structures remain relatively fragmented, with limited systematic integration. This paper adopts a systematic literature review method, using Web of Science as the core database to screen and analyse English empirical studies related to intangible cultural heritage and social media published between 2017 and 2026. A total of 172 publications were initially retrieved. After screening by publication year, subject category, thematic relevance, language, full-text availability, and document type, 29 empirical research articles were finally included. The findings show that five core themes have mainly emerged in this field: the dissemination and presentation of intangible cultural heritage on social media, user participation and interactive behaviour, platform narratives and digital expression, the construction of authenticity and cultural identity, and intangible cultural heritage dissemination and sustainable development. In terms of research methods, the included studies demonstrate the coexistence of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Quantitative studies mainly focus on dissemination effects, user behaviour, and platform data; qualitative studies emphasise cultural meanings, authenticity, and community experiences; and mixed-methods studies are used to explain the complex relationships among technology, platforms, users, and culture. This paper further indicates that future research can be further deepened in terms of theoretical integration, cross-platform comparison, community-based perspectives, platform algorithm mechanisms, and longitudinal research. This paper contributes to mapping the knowledge structure of intangible cultural heritage and social media research and provides a systematic reference for future studies.

Keywords

intangible cultural heritage, social media; systematic literature review, digital communication, research methods

Downloads

References

1. Cao, H. (2025). Exploring the promotion of musical intangible cultural heritage under TikTok short videos. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 24217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09723-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Clark, V. L. P. (2019). Meaningful integration within mixed methods studies: Identifying why, what, when, and how. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Csesznek, C., Rățulea, G., Defta, M., Harabagiu, F. M., & Sorea, D. (2024). The potential for sustainable local development through digital communication and digitization of intangible cultural heritage resources in Făgăraș Land, Romania. Sustainability, 16(4), Article 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041532 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Khalid, M. S., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2018). Representation of intangible cultural heritage of Bangladesh through social media. Anatolia, 29(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2017.1414438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Larsson, S., & Ouattara, S. (2024). Taken from the spirits and given to the people: The dance of the panther men in Côte d’Ivoire. Sustainability, 16(21), Article 9455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li, J. (2022). Grounded theory-based model of the influence of digital communication on handicraft intangible cultural heritage. Heritage Science, 10, Article 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00760-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Liu, J., Chen, C., Zou, H., Zheng, J., & Gao, D. (2025). Preserving China’s intangible cultural heritage through AR/VR storytelling, social media, and AI narratives. npj Heritage Science, 13, Article 355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02265-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Liu, S., & Pan, Y. (2023). Exploring trends in intangible cultural heritage design: A bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Luo, J. M., Hu, Z., & Leong, A. M. W. (2025). Exploring the experience attributes of intangible cultural heritage through big data analytics. Journal of Vacation Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667251323644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Morales-i-Gras, J., Orbegozo-Terradillos, J., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Peña-Fernández, S. (2021). Networks and stories: Analyzing the transmission of feminist intangible cultural heritage on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(4), Article 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5040069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Page, J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Paquienseguy, F., & Guo, Q. (2025). Douyin and the digital spread of intangible cultural heritage: Transforming cultural dissemination in the short videos age. Emerging Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543251344976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pietrobruno, S. (2018). YouTube flow and the transmission of heritage: The interplay of users, content, and algorithms. Convergence, 24(6), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856516680339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Qiu, Q., & Zhang, M. (2021). Using content analysis to probe the cognitive image of intangible cultural heritage tourism: An exploration of Chinese social media. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(4), Article 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10040240 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Qiu, Q., Zuo, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). Intangible cultural heritage in tourism: A research review and investigation of future agenda. Land, 11(1), Article 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wang, J. (2021). Preservation and promotion of China’s musical cultural heritage on the internet. Heritage Science, 9, Article 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00612-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wang, S., Yang, Y., & Shi, W. (2025). Configuring factors for effective dissemination of intangible cultural heritage on Douyin: An fsQCA approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1162. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05414-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Yi, C., Huang, J., & Song, L. (2025). Enhancing intangible cultural heritage dissemination through digital experience: An affective events theory approach. npj Heritage Science, 13, Article 306. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02017-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles