Integrating Social Work into Nigeria's Whole-of-Society Approach to National Security: A Framework for Community Resilience and Sustainable Peace

Nigeria's persistent and evolving security challenges have exposed the limitations of conventional state-centric approaches that rely primarily on military and law enforcement responses. Despite sustained investments in counterterrorism, intelligence, policing, and regional security cooperation, threats such as terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, communal conflicts, violent extremism, and organized crime continue to undermine human security and sustainable development. These challenges have displaced millions, disrupted livelihoods, weakened community institutions, and intensified psychosocial vulnerabilities, underscoring the need for multidimensional and preventive security interventions. This paper examines the strategic role of professional social work within Nigeria's emerging Whole-of-Society approach to national security. Guided by Human Security Theory, Ecological Systems Theory, and Security Governance Theory, the study adopts a qualitative conceptual methodology based on a critical review of scholarly literature, policy documents, and international best practices published between 2021 and 2026. The paper argues that professional social workers possess unique competencies in community mobilization, conflict prevention, psychosocial support, family strengthening, rehabilitation, reintegration, and peacebuilding that remain largely underutilized within Nigeria's security architecture. To address this gap, the study proposes the Social Work–Security Integration Framework (SWSIF) as a conceptual model for integrating social work into national security governance. It concludes that institutionalizing social work within Nigeria's Whole-of-Society security framework would strengthen preventive security, enhance community resilience and social cohesion, and contribute significantly to sustainable peace and national development.

Social Work; National Security; Human Security; Community Resilience; Whole-of-Society Approach; Peacebuilding; Nigeria.

1. Amadasun, S. (2020). Social work for social development in Africa. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amadasun, S. (2021). Social work and social development in Nigeria: A postcolonial perspective. International Social Work, 64(1), 141–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gray, M., & Amadasun, S. (2024). Decolonising social work education and practice in Africa: Contemporary debates and future directions. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 60(2), 159–174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Institute for Economics & Peace. (2025). Global Terrorism Index 2025: Measuring the impact of terrorism. Sydney: Institute for Economics & Peace. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. International Federation of Social Workers. (2024). Global social work statement of ethical principles. https://www.ifsw.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. International Organization for Migration. (2024). Displacement Tracking Matrix: Nigeria round report. Geneva: IOM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kirst-Ashman, K. K., & Hull, G. H. (2023). Understanding generalist practice (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krahmann, E. (2022). Security governance and contemporary global security. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Levy, D., Gray, M., Okoye, U., & Amadasun, S. (2025). A scoping review of Nigerian social work scholarship. International Social Work. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Nigeria multidimensional poverty index survey 2022. Abuja: National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). States of fragility 2022. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). OECD Style Guide (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tadjbakhsh, S. (2021). Human security: Concepts and implications. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). New threats to human security in the Anthropocene: Demanding greater solidarity. New York: UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Nigeria multidimensional poverty index 2022. Abuja: UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human Development Report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock—Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. New York: UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2025). Nigeria operational update. Geneva: UNHCR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Global study on homicide 2023. Vienna: UNODC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Bank. (2024). Nigeria Development Update: Staying the course—Progress amid pressing challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area