Integrating Technology in Lesson Content and Teaching Strategy: Experiences of Public Secondary Science Teachers

The integration of technology into teaching and learning is a challenge. This phenomenological study explored the experiences of 10 junior and senior high school science teachers in Davao Oriental regarding technology integration in pedagogy and lesson content. Through interviews and focus group discussions, we identified two emerging themes: enhanced pedagogical confidence and inclusive, engaging digital instruction, each with corresponding sub-themes. The mediating effect of these themes on the correlation between technology and pedagogical and lesson content may be pursued. Schools may create an environment that provides opportunities for inclusive technology integration.

Integrating technology in lesson content and teaching strategy, experiences of public secondary science teachers

1. Abedi, E. A., & Ackah-Jnr, F. R. (2023). First-order barriers still matter in a. teachers’ use of technology: An exploratory study of multi-stakeholder perspectives of technology integration barriers. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 19(2), 148–165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amin, J. N. (2016). Redefining the Role of Teachers in the Digital Era. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, vol, 3, 3, 6, 40- 45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Florentino, B., Sestito, C., Cruz, W., de Carvalho, A., & Bonidia, R. (2025). a. Artificial intelligence for all? Brazilian teachers on ethics, equity, and the everyday challenges of AI in education. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Foley, G. (2018). Purposive sampling as a non-probability sampling technique in a. qualitative research (unpublished manuscript/section) — based on how Foley is cited defining purposive sampling as selecting participants using researcher judgment about characteristics relevant to the study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College a. Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mthembu, N. G., Gachie, W., & Govender, D. W. (2023). The pedagogical shift in a. the emergence of digital technology: Transforming teaching practices. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 4(11), 1330–1344. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20234112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Navas-Bonilla, C. D. R., Guerra-Arango, J. A., Oviedo-Guado, D. A., & a. Murillo-Noriega, D. E. (2025). Inclusive education through technology: A systematic review of types, tools and characteristics. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1527851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1527851 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ongsotto, R. R. (2025). STEM teachers’ practices, opportunities, and challenges a. in the age of emerging technologies: Implications to education, administration, and teacher training institutions. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(?), 5103–5124. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Paran, L. R. L., De Leon, J. L., & Pade, E. Q. (2024). Challenges in technology a. integration for elementary teachers. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(12), 90–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i12.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Samaniego López, M. V., Orrego Riofrío, M. C., Barriga-Fray, S. F., & Paz Viteri, a. B. S. (2025). Technologies in inclusive education: Solution or challenge? A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(6), Article 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer a. based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Stumpfegger, E. (2017, November 7). Trustworthiness of research. Munich a. Business School Insights. https://www.munich-business-school.de/insights/en/2017/trustworthiness-ofresearch/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sullivan, R. (2024). Using the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge a. (TPACK) model to integrate technology in education. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2356719. (Accessible via Google Scholar) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study