Integrating Visual Rhetoric Theory into Digital Media Education: Advancing Students’ Critical Understanding of Persuasive Advertising and Social Media Content

Authors

Nur Safinas Albakry

Multimedia Creative Department, Faculty of Art, Sustainability & Creative Industry, Sultan Idris Educational University Perak (Malaysia)

Mohd Fauzi Harun

Multimedia Creative Department, Faculty of Art, Sustainability & Creative Industry, Sultan Idris Educational University Perak (Malaysia)

Mohd Ekram Alhafis

Multimedia Creative Department, Faculty of Art, Sustainability & Creative Industry, Sultan Idris Educational University Perak (Malaysia)

Mohd Farizal Puadi

Multimedia Creative Department, Faculty of Art, Sustainability & Creative Industry, Sultan Idris Educational University Perak (Malaysia)

Najat Affendi

Multimedia Creative Department, Faculty of Art, Sustainability & Creative Industry, Sultan Idris Educational University Perak (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0114

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 1324-1335

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-19

Accepted: 2026-02-24

Published: 2026-03-06

Abstract

The fast expansion of digital advertising and social media has highlighted the importance of visual persuasion in altering audience perceptions, behaviours, and decision-making processes. Within this changing context, digital media education is crucial in providing students with the skills required to critically understand and ethically develop persuasive material. This study looks at how incorporating visual rhetoric theory into digital media education improves students' critical understanding of persuasive messages in advertising and social media settings. The analysis is based on a methodical synthesis of thirty Scopus-indexed journal articles and is organised into three interconnected themes: visual persuasion, critical literacy, and ethical awareness. Visual Persuasion looks at how visual rhetoric theory improves students capacity to assess and generate persuasive communications using imagery, symbolism, multimodality, and narrative framing. According to the findings, structured engagement with rhetorical principles such as visual metaphor, emotional appeal, and compositional strategies significantly improves students' persuasive communication skills as well as their ability to create effective digital advertising content for modern platforms. Critical Literacy emphasises students interpretative and evaluative skills when dealing with digital advertising and social media content. The synthesis demonstrates that visual rhetoric instruction promotes deeper analytical thinking by teaching students to recognise persuasive purpose, recognise manipulation strategies, and critically evaluate algorithmically curated and customised communications. This subject emphasises the importance of visual rhetoric as a teaching tool for improving media literacy and fostering reflective interaction in increasingly saturated digital contexts. Ethical Awareness focusses on the moral and societal dimensions of digital persuasion. The analysed research show that using visual rhetoric theory raises students' knowledge of ethical duties related to transparency, representation, data-driven persuasion, and audience vulnerability. Students become more sensitive to ethical communication practices, particularly those involving misleading visuals, algorithmic bias, and the broader societal impact of persuasive media. Overall, this study contributes to digital media education by illustrating the importance of visual rhetoric theory in fostering persuasive skill, critical literacy, and ethical awareness, with significant implications for curriculum design and pedagogical practice in current digital contexts.

Keywords

Visual rhetoric, Digital media education, Critical literacy, Ethical awareness

Downloads

References

1. Adalı, G., Yardibi, F., Aydın, Ş., Güdekli, A., Aksoy, E., & Hoştut, S. (2025). Gender and Advertising: A 50-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Advertising, 54(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2024.2343291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allouzi, A. S., Al Rabadi, I. G., Sarhan, M. I., Abdalaziz, M. M. O., & Shwedeh, F. (2025). DIGITAL MARKETING STANDARDS AND UAE CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW: ASSESSING COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ONLINE MARKETING CLAIMS. Scientific Culture, 11(3.2), 672–684. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11322551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balaskas, S., Konstantakopoulou, M. O., Yfantidou, I., & Komis, K. (2025). Algorithmic Burnout and Digital Well-Being: Modelling Young Adults’ Resistance to Personalized Digital Persuasion. Societies, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15080232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ballesteros, J. M., Mehra, M., Choi, S., Krut, Z., Simpson, M., Yang, Y., Khalil, C., Yeo, Y., Spiegel, B. M. R., & Almario, C. V. (2025). Leveraging Social Media for Health Education: Dissemination of Crohn’s Perianal Fistula Educational Videos via Facebook and Instagram. Crohn’s and Colitis 360, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bigea, G., Mumtaz, M., Portmann, E., Swaminathan, J., & Vedasri, N. (2024). A life engineering perspective on algorithms, AI, social media, and quantitative metrics: A review of three of the most thought-provoking books on the impact of tech on human life. Informatik-Spektrum, 47(5), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-024-01569-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Birnbaum, M. L., Garrett, C. D., Baumel, A., Germano, N. T., Sosa, D., Ngo, H., John, M., Dixon, L. B., & Kane, J. M. (2024). Examining the Effectiveness of a Digital Media Campaign at Reducing the Duration of Untreated Psychosis in New York State: Results From a Stepped-wedge Randomized Controlled Trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 50(3), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dağcı, M., Alptekin, H. M., İhtiyar, D., Öztürk, G., & Öztürk, H. (2025). Evaluation of the Content, Reliability, and Quality of YouTube Videos on Surgical Hand Scrubbing. AORN Journal, 121(4), e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.14319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eum, S. (2025). Effects of digital marketing on departmental choice and awareness in higher education. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790251339786 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fuller, A., Vasek, M., Mariconti, E., & Johnson, S. D. (2025). Platforms, risk perceptions, and reporting: the impact of illicit drug advertisements on social media among UK secondary students. Harm Reduction Journal, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01299-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. García-Rosales, D. F. (2024). Linkedin Advertising in the Education Sector: Analysis of the Main Spanish Universities’ Advertising Campaigns on this Social Network; Linkedin Ads en el sector educativo: Análisis de las Campañas Publicitarias de las Principales Universidades Españolas en esta red social. VISUAL Review. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura, 16(8), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v16.5414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jain, R., & Rao, M. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Impact of Digital Marketing in Higher Education. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies, 19(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7649/CGP/v19i01/123-148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kumar, P., & Masvood, Y. (2025). Impact of Social Media Marketing on Students Enrolment in Edtech Companies. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(6), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.14419/cytmth97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lim, G., Waling, A., James, A., & Power, J. J. (2025). Sex education on the newsfeed: exploring young people’s incidental exposure to information about sex and relationships. Sex Education, 25(4), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2024.2359989 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Makhmudov, S. B., Otakhonova, D., Kulmanov, T., Shamshieva, N. N. K., Juraev, U., Ruziev, G., & Sabirova, U. (2026). The Impact of Digital Marketing and Mobile Applications on Service Innovation in German Companies. International Review of Management and Marketing, 16(1), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.22052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. McNamara, E., & Guinan, E. (2025). Implementation and impact of a virtual educational intervention for parents of fussy eaters. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 194(4), 1347–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03968-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Odaro, O., & Lim, J. (2024). Using a Chat-Based Trivia Activity to Foster Community in Residency. Southern Medical Journal, 117(7), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001705 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Parveen, S., Chang, W., McHugh, P., & Vellinga, A. (2025). Examining the use of different message categories to communicate AMR: a content analysis of instagram posts. Frontiers in Digital Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1564584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pattun, G., & Kumar, P. (2025). Feature Engineering Trends in Text-Based Affective Computing: Rules to Advance Deep Learning Models. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation, 7(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.54392/irjmt2528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Richlak, E., Pope, A., Arroyo, M., Umbaugh, H. M., & Crerand, C. E. (2025). CleftTok: An Analysis of Cleft-Related Content on TikTok. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 62(2), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241297557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sáez-Linero, C., & Jiménez-Morales, M. (2025). Young, lower-class, and algorithmically persuaded: exploring personalized advertising and its impact on social inequality. Communication and Society, 38(2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.38.2.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shi, F., Gu, Q., & Zhou, T. (2024). Understanding brand reputation: a case study of Chinese wineries. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(8), 2774–2794. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2023-1057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Snyder, H. E., Horsthuis, K., Cerga, K., & Callen, D. J. A. (2025). EpilepTikTok: An inductive thematic analysis and quality assessment of #epilepsy content shared via a popular social media platform. Epilepsy and Behavior, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sutherland, K. E., & Morris, K. (2025). Graduate perceptions of social media education: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 16(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2025vol16no1art1988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wan, A. (2024). To Be or Not To Be (an Ad): Advertising Students’ Understanding of Instagram In-Feed Native Advertising. Journal of Advertising Education, 28(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/10980482241265660 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wang, T. C. L., Zhang, M., & Zhang, H. (2025). Examining the impact of social media on youth vaping behavior in China: an analysis of the mediating role of perceptions of policy enforcement. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1524524 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zhao, S., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Research on Multimedia Animation Elements in Information Transmission Under Internet Environment. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCINI.383734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles