Investigating the Role of Feedback in ESL Writing Proficiency: Evidence from Action Research

This action research investigates the effectiveness of peer feedback and teacher-provided verbal feedback in enhancing paragraph writing proficiency among secondary level English as a Second Language (ESL) learners. Writing is a critical yet challenging skill for ESL learners, and effective feedback plays a key role in developing this skill. Over two months, 20 students participated in paragraph writing activities, classroom observations, and interviews to examine the impact of structured peer and teacher feedback on their writing and perceptions. Findings revealed that combining these strategies significantly improved students’ writing, as reflected in higher posttest scores. Students also reported increased motivation, confidence, and autonomy. Peer feedback fostered collaboration and critical thinking, while teacher feedback provided clear guidance for improvement. However, challenges such as perceived judgment and lack of trust in peer feedback were noted, with possible mitigation through structured support. These insights contribute to ESL education by offering a foundation for future research and practice in improving writing instructions. Overall, integrating peer and teacher feedback enhances linguistic proficiency, learner independence, and interactive learning in ESL writing classrooms.

Peer feedback; Teacher-provided verbal feedback; Paragraph Writing proficiency; ESL writing; ESL Education

1. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 62(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. Falmer Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, W., Liu, D., & Lin, C. (2023). Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1078141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Department of Education. (2022). English program scope and sequence (Grades 7–9) (Curricular framework). Retrieved from https://educon.uprm.edu/formularios/marcoscurriculares/INGLES.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cui, Y., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2022). The effects of automated writing evaluation and peer feedback on cohesion and coherence in continuation writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100915. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.5070/L211005216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Indrarathne, B., & McCulloch, S. (2022). English language teaching, learning and assessment in Sri Lanka: Policies and practices in the school education system. British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/2022- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 04/ELT%20learning%20and%20assessment%20in%20Sri%20Lanka_April%202022_new2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. International English Language Testing System. (2021). IELTS writing band descriptors (public version). IELTS. https://www.ielts.org/-/media/pdfs/writing-band-descriptors-task-1.ashx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jayawardena, M. (2021). Teachers’ practices of providing feedback on student writing in Sri Lankan secondary schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(4), 618–628. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1204.05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kang, E. Y. (2010). The effect of teacher feedback on ESL writing: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 563-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kerr, K. (2017). Exploring student perceptions of verbal feedback [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Auckland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316803867_Exploring_student_perceptions_of_verbal_feedbac k [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2002). Action research: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. National Institute of Education. (2017). Grade9 English teachers guide, ISBN 978-955-25- 0072-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Perera, M. R. H. (2020). Factors contributing to persistence of teacher-centered learning in the higher educational sector of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), 4(5), 1438–1443. https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd33116.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Perera, S. (2010). Educational reforms in Sri Lanka: Challenges and prospects. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences, 33(1-2), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Samarajeewa, C., & Mohammed, L. A. (2025). Obstacles in second language acquisition: Linguistic, psychological, social, cultural, and pedagogical challenges with a focus on secondary ESL education in Sri Lanka. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.3582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Trang, N. H., & Anh, K. H. (2022). Effect of peer feedback on paragraph writing performance among high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 189-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2013). Thai EFL students’ writing errors in different text types: The interference of the first language. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p67 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wijayadasa, N. (2013). Teacher education in Sri Lanka: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(2), 15-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wijesuriya, K., & Dissanayake, S. (2021). Gender differences in the preferred learning styles among STEM undergraduates in learning ESL. In Proceedings of the SLIIT International Conference on Advancements in Sciences and Humanities 2021 (378-385). Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, SLIIT, Sri Lanka. https://static.sliit.lk/wp-content/uploads/downloads/SICASH-2021-ConferenceProceedings.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing English Vocabulary Skills for Grade 9 Students ‘Using Deal or No Deal’ Game
• Enhancing Grade 8 English Engagement: Fill My Bag Strategy
• Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Communication Competence: An Input to a Communication Skills Development Module
• Lower Secondary School Students' Attitude toward Reading in English
• Learner Autonomy and Attitudes toward Philippine English: Predictors of Grammar Performance among College ESL Students