Is There a Relationship between All Types of Reading Anxiety?

Authors

Ahmad Aminuddin Soopar

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Nadiah Hanim Abdul Wahab

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Ilham Alia Mat Isa

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Noor Shariena Zaraini

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Mohd Rafie Suhaimi

Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan (Malaysia)

Noor Hanim Rahmat

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200371

Subject Category: Language

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 5012-5027

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-20

Accepted: 2026-02-27

Published: 2026-03-11

Abstract

This study examines how three forms of reading anxiety; top‑down, bottom‑up, and classroom‑based influence learners’ academic reading across disciplines. Using a quantitative survey, data were collected through a five‑point Likert‑scale instrument adapted from Miao and Vibulphol (2020) and Zoghi (2012) to measure the relationships among these anxiety types. The respondents comprised 230 university‑level students enrolled in an academic reading course at a Malaysian public university. The findings show that learners experienced the highest anxiety when identifying main ideas and interpreting overall meaning, while expressing personal responses generated comparatively lower anxiety. Vocabulary difficulty and grammatical complexity emerged as substantial contributors to bottom‑up anxiety, and interactive or evaluative classroom tasks intensified classroom reading anxiety. Strong positive relationships were observed among all anxiety dimensions, whereas no significant disciplinary differences appeared, indicating similar anxiety patterns across fields. The results support the view that reading depends on coordinated top‑down and bottom‑up processing and that anxiety disrupts this interaction, particularly when readers struggle with global comprehension or linguistic decoding. Consistent with Attentional Control Theory (ACT), anxiety appears to redirect attention toward perceived difficulties. These findings suggest the need for instruction that strengthens background‑knowledge activation, enhances vocabulary and grammar support, and incorporates low‑pressure classroom practices to reduce reading anxiety across disciplines as strong correlation among anxiety types were shown.

Keywords

Top-down reading anxiety, bottom-up reading anxiety, classroom reading anxiety

Downloads

References

1. Abd. Hamid, N. B., Dillah, D., & Subramaniam, S. (2024). Exploring Rumelhart’s model for academic reading among undergraduates. ESTEEM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(Special Issue). https://ir.uitm.edu.my/106737/1/106737.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andini, Z. D., Rohmah, Z., & Abdullah, N. N. (2025). Classroom factors and language learning anxiety: 2019–2024 bibliometric review. CALL: Journal of Critical Theory, Art, Language, and Literature, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v7i1.38531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barnes, E. D., Grills, A. E., & Vaughn, S. R. (2024). Relationships between anxiety, attention, and reading performance in children. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01701-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fishstrom, S., Capin, P., Fall, A.-M., Roberts, G., Grills, A. E., & Vaughn, S. (2024). Understanding the relation between reading and anxiety among upper elementary students with reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 74(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-024-00299-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghazali, S. R., Chen, Y. Y., Ling, A. A., Kasnan, N. I. K., Driver, E. S., Mahran, N. N., Faezal, N. F. M., Fikri, F. S. M., & Sabuddin, N. A. M. (2024). Psychological trauma, anxiety, and depression among university students during the first phase of COVID‑19 movement control order in Malaysia. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 46(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-023-09538-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kamaruddin, S. F., & Kaur, N. (2023). Reading anxiety in online classrooms among Malaysian university learners: Lessons from pandemic to post‑pandemic era. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i1.4706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Li, R. (2022). Foreign language reading anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 35(4), 995-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10213-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Macdonald, K. T., Cirino, P. T., Miciak, J., & Grills, A. E. (2021). The Role of Reading Anxiety among Struggling Readers in Fourth and Fifth Grade. Reading & writing quarterly: overcoming learning difficulties, 37(4), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1874580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Miao,Q.Q., & Vibulphol, J. (2020) English as a Foreign language Reading Anxiety of Chinese University Students. International Education Studies, 14(3), 64-71. https://doi. org/10.5539/ies.v14n3p64 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mohamad, M. M. (2025). Reading engagement, reading anxiety, and self-perceived reading success among Malaysian ESL foundation students: A descriptive study. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(11), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Noorezam, M., Rahmat, N. H., Sim, M. S., Noh, M. Z. M., Aripin, N., & Mukhtar, Z. A. (2022). Reading at The University: Difficulty vs Fear. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v12-i8/12285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Öztürk, G. (2023). The relationship between reading and listening anxieties in EFL classrooms: Exploring the mediating effect of FL classroom anxiety. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190523000107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rahmat, N.H., Arepin,M., & Sulaiman, S. (2020) The Cycle of Academic Reading Fear among Undergraduates. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 265-274. 10.24191/ajue.v16i3.9730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. Psychological Review, 89(1), 60–94. https://web.stanford.edu/jlmcc/papers/RumelhartMcClelland82.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an Interactive Model of Reading. In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 722-750). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05321.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Samsuddin, N. A. (2013). Reading anxiety and reading comprehension performance of ESL learners (Master’s thesis). Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14193/?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Soomro, A. H., Khan, I., & Younus, M. (2019). Top down, bottom up & classroom reading anxiety and their effect on reading performance of undergraduate engineering students in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(3), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, So What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zoghi, M. (2012). An Instrument for EFL Reading Anxiety: Inventory Construction and Preliminary Validation. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9, 31-56. 64-71. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/view/0/44773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles