Language Usage among University Staff Members: Communication, Power, Inclusion and Multilingual Practice in Higher Education

Authors

Dr Israel Creleanor Mulaudzi

Department of Professional and Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo (South Africa)

Dr Ndivhudzannyi Michael Nndwamato

Department of Professional and Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo (South Africa)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700560

Subject Category: Language

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 8166-8174

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-25

Accepted: 2026-07-30

Published: 2026-08-07

Abstract

Language is central to the organisation of work in universities because staff members use it to exchange information, negotiate professional identities, exercise authority, build collegial relationships and participate in institutional decision-making. In multilingual universities, however, language choice may simultaneously enable communication and reproduce exclusion. This conceptual article examines language usage among academic, administrative, professional, and support staff, with particular reference to South African higher education. Drawing on sociolinguistic perspectives, linguistic capital, communities of practice, and translanguaging, the article analyses formal communication, informal interaction, code-switching, digital communication, and the relationship between language and institutional power. It argues that the continued dominance of English offers a shared medium for cross-linguistic communication and international engagement, but may disadvantage staff who possess valuable professional knowledge without equal confidence in dominant academic and bureaucratic registers. Conversely, the unreflective use of a shared local language can exclude colleagues who do not understand it. The article proposes a Context-Responsive Inclusive Staff Communication Framework comprising communicative access, multilingual flexibility, linguistic respect, power awareness, digital clarity and institutional accountability. It concludes that effective university communication requires neither rigid monolingualism nor unrestricted language choice, but an ethically managed multilingual approach that matches language practices to audience, purpose, and context. Universities should therefore translate high-stakes information where necessary, encourage inclusive multilingual interaction, strengthen plain-language communication, support language learning, and evaluate whether their language policies are implemented in everyday staff practices.

Keywords

university staff, workplace communication, multilingualism, language policy, linguistic inclusion

Downloads

References

1. Baleni, A. S. (2025). South African universities at a crossroads: The imperialist global knowledge economy as a barrier to multilingual higher education. Educational Research for Social Change, 14(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/v14n2a17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cele, N. (2021). Understanding language policy as a tool for access and social inclusion in South African higher education: A critical policy analysis perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(6), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-6-3730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Higher Education and Training. (2020). Language policy framework for public higher education institutions. Government Gazette No. 43860. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/202011/43860gon1160.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Holmes, L., Marra, M., & Vine, B. (2023). Exploring university life with the ethical and political acts of everyday multilingualism. Current Issues in Language Planning, 24(4), 414–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.2013061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Madadzhe, R. N. (2019). Using African languages at universities in South Africa: The struggle continues. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 58, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.5842/58-0-843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Maseko, B. (2023). On the dialectics of policy and practice: Language policy in South African higher education. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2268395. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2268395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Maseko, B. (2023). On the dialectics of policy and practice: Language policy in South African higher education. Cogent Education, 10(2), Article 2268395. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2268395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Maseko, B. (2024). Micro language planning as a contested space: The case of a South African university language policy. Ethnopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2024.2365660 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mohlahlo, A. L., & Ditsele, T. (2022). Exploring multilingualism at the national department levels in South Africa post the Use of Official Languages Act of 2012. Literator, 43(1), a1819. https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v43i1.1819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mugwaze, F. (2025). Reclaiming academic autonomy in South African higher education: Decolonial multilingualism as counter-hegemonic praxis against neoliberal market forces. Educational Research for Social Change, 14(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/v14n2a10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Munyaradzi, J. (2024). Neoliberalism in South African higher education language policy: A decolonial perspective. Transformation in Higher Education, 9, Article 395. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v9i0.395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ngubane, N. (2025). Leveraging multilingual interventions at a South African university: A decolonial perspective. Educational Research for Social Change, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/v14n2a11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rakgogo, T. J. (2024). A linguistic evaluation of the South African higher education sector: A reflection on 30 years of democracy (1994–2024). Transformation in Higher Education, 9, Article 342. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v9i0.342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNESCO. (2024). Multilingualism and language diversity for inclusion in education: Brief on inclusion in education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNESCO. (2025). Languages matter: Global guidance on multilingual education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000392477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yafele, S. (2024). Exploring views on praxis possibilities of multilingualism in university literacy pedagogies. Reading & Writing, 15(1), Article a451. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v15i1.451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles