Leadership Equity and Educational Governance in Promoting Fair Disciplinary Practices Among Students in Tawi-Tawi
Authors
1Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University, R.T. Lim Boulevard, Baliwasan, Zamboanga City, Philippines (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0578
Subject Category: Educational Leadership and Management
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 7837-7858
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-04
Accepted: 2026-09-09
Published: 2026-09-22
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined how school rules, leadership, and disciplinary practices work together to create a fair environment.
Design/methodology/approach: Using a correlational design, the research analyzed how respondents perceived these three areas.
Findings: The findings showed a strong positive connection between all variables, with correlation coefficients (rs) ranging from .746 to .759. Specifically, clear school rules were highly linked to both fair disciplinary practices and honest leadership. With a p-value of .000, these results are statistically significant, proving that these connections are not due to chance. Essentially, when people trust their leaders to be honest, they are much more likely to view school discipline as fair. The study concludes that rules, leadership behavior, and discipline are deeply interconnected.
Originality/value: To improve a school’s climate, management should take a holistic approach, as better leadership integrity and transparent rules directly lead to a stronger sense of overall fairness.
Keywords
school leadership, disciplinary practices, school rules, fairness, institutional climate
Downloads
References
1. Asadullah, M. N. (2024). Educational leadership, governance and gender: A multi-country stakeholder study. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Brillantes, A., & Fernandez, M. (2018). Decentralization and governance in Philippine education. Philippine Journal of Public Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. David, C., et al. (2019). Leadership training and equity in Philippine schools. Ateneo Policy Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. De la Vega, L. F., & Leiva-Guerrero, M. V. (2026). Systemic leadership and educational equity: A review of proposals from international organizations. Education Sciences, 16(2), 251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dullas, A. R. (2018, April). The development of academic self-efficacy scale for Filipino junior high school students. In Frontiers in Education, 3, 19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Mediratta, K. (2017). Eliminating disparities in school discipline: A framework for intervention. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 253–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Grogan, M., & Shakeshaft, C. (2011). Women and educational leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hallinger, P. (2015). Instructional leadership and equity in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hassan, N. E., Abdulla, M. J., Abdulwahid, K. S., Omar, L. U., & Sahibuddin, R. M. (2025). The impact of traditional Madrasah and MBHTE elementary education on the Sama Dilaut in Simunul, Tawi-Tawi. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(6), 6437–6450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: No justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Khalifa, M., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lala, A. S. (2023). School leadership and governance: A literature review. Global Scientific Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 31–43). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lumby, J., & Coleman, M. (2016). Leading for equality: Making schools fairer. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Mohd. Arip, A. L. (2020). Administrative competencies of elementary and secondary school heads in Bongao, Tawi-Tawi based on the National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads (Master’s thesis). Mindanao State University Tawi-Tawi College of Technology and Oceanography, Bongao, Tawi-Tawi, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Nguyen, T. N., et al. (2021). Hybrid supervised and unsupervised learning for anomaly-based intrusion detection. Applied Intelligence, 51(5), 3338–3356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02048-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Orbeta, A., & Esguerra, E. (2016). The K to 12 reform: Implications for the Philippine labor market. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Payne, A. A., & Welch, K. (2018). Restorative justice in schools: The influence of race, discipline, and school context. Youth & Society, 50(4), 548–574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Rodrigues, C., Neto-Mendes, A., Santos, M., & Gouveia, A. (2023). Mapping problems and approaches in educational governance. Education Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and digital governance: Critical perspectives. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Shields, C. M. (2010). Transformative leadership: Working for equity in diverse contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 558–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Shields, C. M. (2017). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in an uncertain and complex world. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Rausch, M. K. (2014). New and developing research on disparities in discipline. Bloomington, IN: The Equity Project at Indiana University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Skiba, R. J., et al. (2016). Achieving equity in discipline: Strategies for administrators. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 47–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Spillane, J. (2015). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Tikly, L. (2020). Education for sustainable development in the Global South: Equity and leadership challenges. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(4), 423–439. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Ugis, P. S., Castulo, N. J., Sulanting-Sangkula, Z., Mohammad, K. H., Dugasan, N. J., Sali-Ondo, D., ... & Hajad, S. A. (2026). Integrating Sama Dilaut culture: a case study for inclusion in the Philippine school improvement plan. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1785303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. UNESCO. (2021). Digital governance in education: Enhancing transparency and equity. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. UNESCO. (2024). Gender equity in educational leadership: A multi-country study. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. UNESCO. (2024/25). Global Education Monitoring Report: Leadership in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. University of the Philippines Open University. (2025). School governance in complex contexts: A systems-informed framework. UPOU Research Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]