Learning Through Movement: Kinesthetic Strategies for Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention in Primary and Secondary ESL and EFL Classrooms - A Systematic Review
Authors
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600 (Malaysia)
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600 (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100467
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 5991-6008
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-20
Accepted: 2026-01-27
Published: 2026-02-13
Abstract
Vocabulary knowledge plays a crucial role in ESL and EFL learners’ language development; however, vocabulary retention remains a persistent challenge, particularly among primary and secondary school learners in conventional classroom settings. In response to this issue, kinesthetic or movement-based learning strategies have been increasingly explored as an alternative approach to vocabulary instruction. This study presents a systematic literature review of 15 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2024 that examined the effects of kinesthetic learning strategies on vocabulary acquisition and retention among ESL and EFL learners. Guided by PRISMA procedures, the review included peer-reviewed experimental and quasi-experimental studies involving primary and secondary learners, with vocabulary outcomes measured through pre- and post-intervention assessments. The reviewed studies employed strategies such as Total Physical Response, gesture-based learning, movement games, drama-based activities, and selected technology-assisted approaches. Overall, the findings indicate that kinesthetic strategies are associated with improved short-term vocabulary acquisition and, in several studies, enhanced vocabulary retention over time, particularly among young and lower-proficiency learners. In addition, many studies reported increased learner engagement and motivation during vocabulary instruction. This review highlights the potential of kinesthetic learning as an effective pedagogical approach for vocabulary development and provides evidence-based insights for educators seeking to incorporate movement-based strategies into ESL and EFL classrooms.
Keywords
kinesthetic learning, vocabulary acquisition and retention, Total Physical Response (TPR), ESL, EFL
Downloads
References
1. Akdağ Çimen, B., Çeşme, H. (2022). Effect of TPR and CLT on young EFL learners’ speaking anxiety, oral proficiency, and vocabulary learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching [e-FLT], 19(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.56040/akce1924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Al-Obaydi, L. H., & Pikhart, M. (2024). Reducing foreign language anxiety through movement-based learning activities. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 4121–4138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12061-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Andrä, C., Mathias, B., Schwager, A., Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2020). Learning foreign language vocabulary with gestures and pictures enhances vocabulary memory for several months post-learning in eight-year-old school children. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 815–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09527-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Asher, J. J. (1977). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guidebook. Sky Oaks Productions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Barcroft, J. (2018). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Boonkongsaen, P., Sripetpun, W., & Piamsai, C. (2020). Effects of kinesthetic learning on EFL vocabulary retention. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 623–631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cannon, A. S. (2016). Drama-based instruction and academic language development in ESL classrooms. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 655–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Shimray, R., & Wangdi, T. (2025). Boredom in online foreign language classrooms: Antecedents and solutions from students’ perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2178442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Dongsanniwas, W., & Sukying, A. (2024). The effect of TPR tasks on word knowledge of Thai primary school learners. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(5), 208. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n5p208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Husanović, D. (2022). The effectiveness of total physical response method in the process of learning and teaching English vocabulary to Pre-Adolescent learners in an online teaching setting. NETSOL New Trends in Social and Liberal Sciences, 7(2), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.24819/netsol2022.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jusslin, S., Lilja, N., Korpinen, K., & Anttila, E. (2022). Embodied learning and teaching approaches in language education: A mixed-methods review. Educational Research Review, 37, 100480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kao, S.-M., & O’Neill, C. (2014). Words into worlds: Learning a second language through process drama. Ablex Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Liu, P.-L., Chen, C.-J., & Chen, H.-C. (2024). Effects of personalised Total Physical Response on young EFL learners’ vocabulary recall. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 451–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Liu, S., & Chen, S. (2021). Research on TPR in English vocabulary teaching in primary schools: A case study of a primary school in Hangzhou. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(5), 890–899. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Macedonia, M. (2019). Embodied learning: Why at school the mind needs the body. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Macedonia, M. (2025). Your body as a tool to learn second language vocabulary. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15080997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Macedonia, M., & Knösche, T. R. (2011). Body in mind: How gestures empower foreign language learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(4), 196–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Mayer, A., Yildiz, M., Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2021). Visual and motor enrichment in foreign language learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Nazara, S. (2019). The effectiveness of Total Physical Response in vocabulary learning. Journal of English Language Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Nekooi, N., & Shahrokhi, M. (2016). The impact of Total Physical Response on vocabulary learning of young EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 720–727. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Pacheco Delgado, E. F., Villafuerte-Holguín, J., & López Vélez, J. (2022). Teaching English through Total Physical Response with songs and dance. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(2), 102–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Palaigeorgiou, G., Papadopoulou, P., & Kazanidis, I. (2017). Tangible and augmented reality learning environments for vocabulary development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1539–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9543-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Sarhan, N., Good, J., & Howland, K. (2020). Investigating student preferences on Gesture-Based interactions in a vocabulary game. European Conference on Games Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.34190/gbl.20.054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Schmitt, N. (2019). Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Shukhratova, S. (2025). Unlocking vocabulary through movement: Assessing the impact of TPR on word retention. Scientific Journal of Language Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Taddese, E. T. (2025). Teaching English to young learners through movement-based strategies. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1656387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Tuan, L. T. (2017). Enhancing learner motivation through physical activities in vocabulary learning. International Journal of Language Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Wang, F., Hwang, W.-Y., Li, Y.-H., Chen, P.-T., & Manabe, K. (2019). Collaborative Total Physical Response with Kinect-based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 138–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Wang, S. (2024). The role of biomechanics in enhancing cognitive function and learning outcomes in English language teaching. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 383. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21i2.383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple intelligences theory: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 207–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Yıldız, D., Fidan, U., Yıldız, M., Er, B., Ocak, G., Güngör, F., Ocak, I., & Akyildiz, Z. (2024). Interactive digital floor systems for kinesthetic vocabulary learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2671–2694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11952-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). The effects of learning strategies on vocabulary acquisition and retention: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 517–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09562-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study