Legal Aspects of Antitrust Law: A Bibliometric Analysis

This study examines the global scholarly landscape on the legal aspects of antitrust law by conducting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to understand the evolution, intellectual structure and contemporary research directions within this field. Although antitrust law has long been central to market regulation and economic governance, the rapid expansion of digital markets, emerging enforcement challenges and increasing cross-border legal complexities have created a need for systematic mapping of academic contributions to identify dominant themes, research gaps and influential jurisdictions. To address this problem, the present study utilised a multi-stage methodology integrating several digital research tools. Data were retrieved using Scopus advanced searching, producing a final dataset of 885 documents after applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical patterns and graphical trends were generated through the Scopus Analyzer, enabling examination of publication growth, leading countries, institutions, sources and citation performance. OpenRefine was employed to clean, standardise and harmonise the dataset, particularly for resolving inconsistencies in author names, keywords and country affiliations. Subsequently, VOSviewer software was used to construct visualisations through co-authorship, co-occurrence and citation-network mapping to uncover thematic clusters and collaboration structures. The results reveal significant growth in antitrust-related legal scholarship between 2005 and 2025, with the United States and several European jurisdictions dominating output and influence. Keyword networks identify four major thematic clusters: core legal doctrines of competition law, anti-competitive conduct and market power, digital-platform regulation and jurisdiction-specific enforcement frameworks. Overall, the findings highlight a dynamic and increasingly diversified research landscape, underscoring the evolving interplay between law, economics and digital regulation. This study contributes a structured evidence base that supports future research directions and helps scholars, policymakers, and practitioners understand where antitrust law scholarship is advancing and where further exploration is needed.

Antitrust, Competition Law, Jurisdictions, Policy

1. Al-Khoury, A., Hussein, S. A., Abdulwhab, M., Aljuboori, Z. M., Haddad, H., Ali, M. A., Abed, I. A., & Flayyih, H. H. (2022). Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alves, J. L., Borges, I. B., & De Nadae, J. (2021). Sustainability in complex projects of civil construction: Bibliometric and bibliographic review. Gestao e Producao, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Assyakur, D. S., & Rosa, E. M. (2022). Spiritual Leadership in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Aisyah : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v7i2.914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Averitt, N. W., & Lande, R. H. (2007). Using the “consumer choice” approach to antitrust law. Antitrust Law Journal, 74(1), 175–264. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33947723697&partnerID=40&md5=3aff2d0d52002e3e54d162e9caedbbf6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Black, O. (2005). Conceptual foundations of anti trust. In Conceptual Foundations of Anti Trust. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494666 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowden, T. A. (2017). Antitrust: The war against contract. In The Abolition of Antitrust (pp. 95–118). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315083186-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cooper, J. C., Froeb, L. M., O’Brien, D., & Vita, M. G. (2005). Vertical antitrust policy as a problem of inference. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(7–8), 639–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Davies, W. (2010). Economics and the “nonsense” of law: The case of the Chicago antitrust revolution. Economy and Society, 39(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Veronay, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Etro, F. (2007). Competition, innovation, and antitrust: A theory of market leaders and its policy implications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49601-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. European Commission. (2017). Case AT.39740: Google Search (Shopping) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Evans, D. S., & Jorge Padilla, A. (2005). Designing antitrust rules for assessing unilateral practices: A Neo-Chicago approach. University of Chicago Law Review, 72(1), 73–98. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-17244378477&partnerID=40&md5=48c90de266ee77da3d776ae52b99d36f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. In International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 162, pp. 101–114). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Federal Trade Commission v. Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc.), No. 20-3590 (D.D.C. 2021) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Feinstein, D. L., Kuhlmann, P., & Mucchetti, P. J. (2015). Accountable care organizations and antitrust enforcement: Promoting competition and innovation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 40(4), 875–886. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3150112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gregory Sidak, J. G., & Teece, D. (2009). Dynamic competition in antitrust law. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 5(4), 581–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhp024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hoffmann-La Roche v. Commission, Case 85/76, EU:C:1979:36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hylton, K. N., & Deng, F. (2007). Antitrust around the world: An empirical analysis of the scope of competition laws and their effects. Antitrust Law Journal, 74(2), 271–341. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34548057539&partnerID=40&md5=f24f1be0f0c1c2c3b96da0c2afae8d1b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Intel Corp. v. European Commission, Case C-413/14 P, EU:C:2017:632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Katz, A. (2016). Intellectual property, antitrust, and the rule of law: Between private power and state power. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 17(2), 633–709. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2016-0023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Khiste, G. P., & Paithankar, R. R. (2017). Analysis of Bibliometric term in Scopus. International Research Journal, 01(32), 78–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. López, Á. L., & Vives, X. (2019). Overlapping ownership, R&D spillovers, and antitrust policy. Journal of Political Economy, 127(5), 2394–2437. https://doi.org/10.1086/701811 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Michelin v. Commission (Michelin I), Case 322/81, EU:C:1983:313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nachbar, T. B. (2013). The antitrust constitution. Iowa Law Review, 99(1), 57–114. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84893074467&partnerID=40&md5=5db2d31eeef8961fdf0eda8c9e06eefa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Noonan, K. E. (2015). The role of regulatory agencies and intellectual property: Part II. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ohio v. American Express Co., 585 U.S. ___ (2018) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Steren, E. J. (2022). Antitrust Law (pp. 327–347). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08162-0_22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Stylianou, K. (2025). Antitrust in the Decentralized Economy: DeFi, Central Bank Digital Currencies, and Blockchain. In Antitrust in the Decentralized Economy: DeFi, Central Bank Digital Currencies, and Blockchain. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191925504.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. United States et al. v. Google LLC, No. 1:20-cv-03010 (D.D.C. 2020) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 (1940) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems, 15(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Whinston, M. D. (2007). Chapter 36 Antitrust Policy toward Horizontal Mergers. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3, 2369–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(06)03036-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. White, M. D. (2016). On the justification of antitrust: A matter of rights and wrongs. Antitrust Bulletin, 61(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X16646571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wigger, A., & Nölke, A. (2007). Enhanced roles of private actors in EU business regulation and the erosion of rhenish capitalism: The case of antitrust enforcement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00719.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wu, Y. C. J., & Wu, T. (2017). A decade of entrepreneurship education in the Asia Pacific for future directions in theory and practice. In Management Decision (Vol. 55, Issue 7, pp. 1333–1350). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.