Legal Protection of Trademark Owners Against Domain Abuse: A Comparison Between the United States and Indonesia

The development of information technology and electronic commerce has made domain names more than just internet addresses; they are now part of a business's identity and strategy, closely related to its brand. In practice, there have been instances of domain names that are identical or similar to registered trademarks being registered and used in bad faith (cybersquatting). This practice has the potential to harm trademark owners as it can cause consumer confusion and exploit the reputation of established brands. Legal issues arise because the Indonesian legal system does not yet have regulations that explicitly classify domain name abuse as a form of trademark infringement. This study aims to analyze the urgency of domain name regulations in trademark protection, examine the forms of legal protection that trademark owners can pursue against domain name abuse, and compare these regulations with those in the United States. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative law approach. The legal materials analyzed include the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) in the United States. Article 83 of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Act does provide a basis for compensation claims for trademark infringement, but there is a normative gap because it does not explicitly regulate the misuse of domain names as part of trademark infringement, indicating that there is a normative gap in Article 83 of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Act because it does not explicitly regulate the misuse of domain names as part of trademark infringement. As a result, dispute resolution still depends on the interpretation of judges and general provisions regarding trademark infringement or unlawful acts. Legal protection in Indonesia is carried out in two forms, namely preventive protection through trademark registration and objection and cancellation mechanisms, and repressive protection through civil lawsuits based on Article 83 of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law and the possibility of criminal charges. However, there is a normative gap in Article 83 because it does not explicitly regulate the misuse of domain names as a form of trademark infringement, so dispute resolution still depends on legal interpretation. In contrast, the United States clearly regulates the registration and use of domain names in bad faith as trademark infringement through the ACPA. Therefore, adjustments and strengthening of regulations in Indonesian trademark law are needed to provide greater certainty and more effective legal protection for trademark owners in the digital age.

domain, trademark, legal protection

1. Amalia, Reva,”Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Cybersquatting Di Indonesia,” Lex Renaissance Vol.5 No.4,2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, Mirza, Priliyani Nugroho Putri,”Perlindngan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual atas Hak Cipta Karakter Game Among US di Indonesia,” Padjajaran Law Riview Vol.9 No.2, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alfarizi,Maolana, ”Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Konvensi Paris Ke Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis”,Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial, Vol 3 No.1,2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Fatih ,Sholahuddin, ”Analisis Keterhubungan Konsep Merek dengan Nama Domain: Kajian Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia”,Journal of Judicial Review,Vol 23 No.2, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adani,Nadhila, Santoso ,Budi, ”Kelemahan Perlindungan HKI di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis”, Notarius,Vol 16 No.1,2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Amalia ,Dian Utami, Mulyana,Bagos Budi, Ramadhan, Fajar Falah,Fajrawati, Noerma Kurnia,”Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Era Digital Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum,Vol 1 No.1,2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Aliyah, Latifa Himatul,”Tinjauan Normatif Mengenai Typosquatting Pada Domain Shopee Melalui Whatsapp Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia”,Law Research Riview Quarterly,Vol 10 No.3, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ardian, Selni, Lanontji, Muryanto, Anggriyani, Rima, ”First to File Principle Dan Sengketa Hak Merek Dalam Kajian Perundang Undangan di Indonesia”,Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam ,Vol 5 No.1,2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Angel, Rambing,Sandra Asaloei, Danny D.S Mukuan,”Pengaruh Citra Merek dan Loyalitas Pelanggan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian di J.Co Donut & Coffe Mega Mall Manado,” Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis(JAB) Vol.15 No.2, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bernad Ninggolan. Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital. (Yogyakarta: Publika Global Media. 2021) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Clara, Sylvia Lesmna, Dianne Eka Rusmawati,dan Nenny Dwi Ariani,”Perlindungan Hukum Merek di Indonesia Secara Preventif dan Penegakan Represif Berdasarkan Undang-undang No. 20 Tahunn 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Georafis,” Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol.14 No.2, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Firmansyah, Hery. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek. (Yogyajakarta: Pustaka Yustitia.2011) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fahed, Wahdani, ”The legal character of domain names' cybersquatting”, Law, Society Organisation, Vol 4 No.10,2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gunawan, Reggina Salsabila Putri, Duta Muhammad,”Diferensiasi Hukum Terhadap Praktik Reserve Domain Nmae Hijacking (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat,” Padjajaran Law Riview Vol. 11 No. 2,2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hidayah, Khoirul. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Malang: Setara Press.2018) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hasanah, Hetty,Wahyudi,”Prinsip-Prinsip yang Harus Dipertimbangkan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Nama Domain Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik,” Negara Hukum Vol.12 No.1, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Heniasy, Vivi , Ariawan Gunandi, ”Perlindungan Hukum Well Known Mark dari Tindakan Passing Off: Upaya Menjaga Reputasi dan Hak”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humaniora, Vol 5 No.2,2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Istiqmali, Medisita Nurfauziah, Iwan Erar Joesoef, “ Iktikad Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Merek: Studi Perlindungan Merek Terkenal di Indonesia,” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Vol.2 No.3, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kamila, Prasetyo,”Kepastian Hukum Atas Pemberlakuan Sistem Pendaftaran Merek First to File Terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia,” Jurnal Notarius Vol.1 no.2, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Komaldi, Akram, Fauza, Ranti, Mayana, Permata, Rika Ratna , ”Asas Itikad Baik dalam Upaya Pelindungan Merek Atas Tindak Perundungan Merek Dagang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis”, Media Hukum Indonesia, Vol 2 No.4, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kaparang, Andika Richardi, ”Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Marek Berdasarkan Ketentuan Perundang-undangan Indonesia”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat Lex privatum Vol 13. No. 02,2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lekosono, Arrum Budi, Agri Chairunisa Istradjuningtias, dan Muhammad Ridho Anshary,”Kajian Terhadap Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Preventif terhadap Merek Dagang di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis,” Jurnal Humaniora dan Ilmu Sosial Vol.01 No.04, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Merek: Cara Mudah Mempelajari Undang-Undang Merek. (Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.2005) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Muti’ah, Dewi, Mufid, Firda Laily,”Regulasi Kejahatan Cyber Sebagai Upaya Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Cybersquatting”, Yustisia Merdeka, Vol 8 No.1, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Maulidi, Thoriq, Sugiri, Bambang, Ruslijanto, Patricia Audrey, ”Cybersquatting Actions On Domain Name Trademark Right As The Internet Web”,Ta’zir: Jurnal Hukum Pidana ,Vol 8 No.2,2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nasution, Rahmi Jened Parinduri. Interface Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual dan Hukum Persaingan (Penyalahgunaan HKI). (Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo.2013) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Riswandi, Budi Agus. Hak Cipta Di Internet Aspek Hukum Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia. (Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.2009) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Roisah, Kholis. Konsep Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Sejarah, Pengertian dan Filosofi Pengakuan HKI Dari Masa Ke Masa. (Malang: Setara Press.2015) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ramli, M. Ahmad, Palar, Miranda Risang Ayu. Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual: Indikasi Geografis Dan Tradisi Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. (Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.2019) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rizkia, Nanda Dwi. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar. (Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung.2022) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ramadhan, M. Citra, Siregar Fitri Yanni Dewi, Wibowo Bagus Firman. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Medan: Universitas Medan Area Press.2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sentosa. Prosedur dan Tata Cara Memperoleh Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Bandung: CV. Yrama Widya.2002) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Saidin. Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights). (Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada. 2003) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sutedi, Andrian. 2009. Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.