Lessons Learned from the Tourism Assistant Project (TAP): A Project Management and Sustainability Analysis of Vocational Training in Mandalay, Myanmar
Authors
Krirk University (Thailand)
Krirk University (Thailand)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601313
Subject Category: Sustainable and Project Management
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 19144-19154
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-01
Accepted: 2026-07-06
Published: 2026-07-18
Abstract
This study provides a comprehensive project management analysis of the Tourism Assistant Project (TAP), a vocational training program for underprivileged youth at the Phaung Daw Oo Monastic Education School in Mandalay, Myanmar. The program was funded by Foerderverein Myanmar (Germany) from 2014 to 2021, and it was successfully integrated over 300 graduates into the tourism workforce before it was disrupted by political instability.
The study uses a qualitative research design and collects data through 30 in-depth interviews with alumni, managers, trainers, donors, and prospective students. It utilizes the analytical framework based on the Project Management Lifecycle (PMLC), Vocational Education and Training (VET) theory, and Lacanian psychoanalysis to explore the formation of professional identity.
The findings show that TAP was successfully implemented and provided training aligned with industry needs, which significantly improved participants’ employability. The program is designed to develop technical skills and support a meaningful change in professional identity, empowering marginalized individuals to transition into recognized roles within the tourism sector. A main weakness in the project's design was its lack of financial diversification, as it relied entirely on a single external donor to sustain its operations. The project’s long-term sustainability was restricted by its dependence on limited funding sources, a challenge that was further strengthened by Myanmar’s political and economic instability.
To overcome these challenges, the research proposes a hybrid, self-sustaining project model. This model advocates for the integration of income-generating social enterprises, diversified funding streams, and strengthened industry partnerships to ensure institutional resilience. This study provides actionable guidance for policymakers and development professionals by integrating project management frameworks into the context of socio-educational sustainability. It provides as a strategic roadmap for designing and maintaining resilient vocational training programs within conflict-affected or resource-constrained environments, ensuring that educational interventions can survive external shocks and achieve lasting impact.
Keywords
Project Management, Vocational Training, Sustainability Tourism, Crisis Management
Downloads
References
1. Alter, S. K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue Ventures, 12(1), 1-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bebbington, A. (2005). Donor–NGO relations and representations of livelihood. World Development, 33(6), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2014). State fragility and governance: Conflict mitigation and subnational perspectives. Public Administration and Development, 34(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Charney, M. W. (2009). A history of modern Burma. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cheesman, N. (2018). How in Myanmar 'national races' came to surpass citizenship and exclude Rohingya. In Interpreting Communal Violence in Myanmar (pp. 127-145). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Stanford University Graduate School of Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Friedrich, K. (2023). A systematic literature review concerning the different interpretations of the role of sustainability in project management. Management Review Quarterly, 73(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00230-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ghorpade, Y., Imtiaz, M. S., & Han, T. (2024). High-skilled migration from Myanmar: Responses to signals of political and economic stabilization (Policy Research Working Paper No. 10878). World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gray, C. F., & Larson, E. W. (2018). Project management: The managerial process (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hillson, D. (2003). Effective opportunity management for projects: Exploiting positive risk. Marcel Dekker. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. International Labor Organization. (2019). Skills development and vocational training in Myanmar. ILO Country Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. International Labor Organization. (2020). Global employment trends for youth 2020: Technology and the future of jobs. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kyi, S. P., Kandiko Howson, C., & Oo, Z. (2014). The role of monastic education in Myanmar. British Council Myanmar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lacan, J. (1977). Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lall, M. (2016). Understanding reform in Myanmar: People and society in the wake of military rule. Hurst & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lorch, J. (2007). Myanmar’s monastic schools and their role in education (GIGA Working Paper No. 59). German Institute of Global and Area Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. McGrath, S., Mulder, M., Papier, J., & Suart, R. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of vocational education and training: Developments in the changing world of work. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Ministry of Hotels and Tourism. (2013). Myanmar tourism master plan 2013–2020. Union of Myanmar Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Save the Children. (2016). Monastic education in Myanmar: A baseline research study. Save the Children International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Spiro, M. E. (1982). Buddhism and society: A great tradition and its Burmese vicissitudes. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Thant Myint-U. (2001). The making of modern Burma. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. UNESCO. (2013). Monastic education system in Myanmar: Status and challenges. UNESCO Yangon Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. UNESCO. (2016). Strategy for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) (2016–2021). UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. UNESCO. (2018). Myanmar education sector analysis. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. UNESCO. (2021). Technical and vocational education and training in conflict-affected settings. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education's promise. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. World Bank. (2020). Myanmar economic monitor: Myanmar in the time of COVID-19. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. World Bank. (2024). Population, total – Myanmar (World Development Indicators). World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. World Travel & Tourism Council. (2020). Economic impact report: Myanmar. WTTC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Žižek, S. (2006). How to read Lacan. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]