Leveraging Emoji-Based Diagrammatic Approaches to Enhance Algebra Learning in Lower Secondary Education

The aim of this study is to evaluate the understanding and effectiveness of the Emoji Diagrammatic Approach (EDA) in the teaching and learning of algebra among Form One students in a Malaysian secondary school. A total of 26 students were involved in this action research. Data were collected using pre-tests, post-tests, student feedback forms, and document analysis. Prior to the main study, a pilot test involving five students was conducted to validate and refine the research instruments.The results indicate notable improvements in students’ understanding and engagement in learning algebra through the use of emojis in diagrammatic representations. Quantitative data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software (version 17.0). The findings suggest that the Emoji Diagrammatic Approach not only enhances students’ conceptual understanding but also stimulates interest and logical thinking in algebraic problem-solving. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of thorough teacher preparation, including assessing students’ prior knowledge and carefully planning lesson delivery to ensure the approach is effectively implemented. This approach offers promising potential as an innovative strategy in teaching mathematics, particularly in addressing common difficulties faced by lower secondary students in algebra.

Emoji, Diagrammatic Approach, Algebra, Teaching Strategies

1. Beckmann, S. (2004). Solving algebra and other story problems with simple diagrams: A method demonstrated in grade 4–6 texts used in Singapore. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Curriculum Development Center. (2003). Teaching courseware: Mathematics Form One. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hiebert, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. DIaNe Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kerslake, D., & Noyes, A. (2022). The role of diagrams in mathematical understanding: A review of literature. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(5), 657–675. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kızıltoprak, A., & Yavuzsoy Köse, N. (2017). Relational thinking: The bridge between arithmetic and algebra. IEJEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lee, J., & Hsu, Y. (2023). Understanding student difficulties in learning algebra: A focus on cognitive barriers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 245–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lowrie, T. (2020). The utility of diagrams in elementary problem solving. Cognitive Development, 55, 100921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mason, J. (2008). Making use of children’s powers to produce algebraic thinking. In Algebra in the early grades (pp. 57–94). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. ERIC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Muasya, J. N., & Mulwa, P. M. (2023). Pilot study, a neglected part of qualitative and quantitative research process: Evidence from selected PhD theses and dissertations. Higher Education Research, 8(4), 115–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Murata, A. (2008). Mathematics teaching and learning as a mediating process: The case of tape diagrams. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 374–406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ott, R. L., & Longnecker, M. (2010). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Radford, L., & Sabena, C. (2015). The question of method in a Vygotskian semiotic approach. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 157–182). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Smith, R., & Jones, T. (2022). Engaging students through innovative teaching methods: The case for using emojis in education. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 300–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wang, L., & Chen, Z. (2023). Using visual representations to teach algebra: Effects on student performance and attitudes. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(3), 123–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Westlund, E., & Stuart, E. A. (2017). The nonuse, misuse, and proper use of pilot studies in experimental evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(2), 246–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Winn, B. (1987). Charts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materials. In The psychology of illustration (pp. 152–198). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhao, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2023). The impact of visual aids on students' engagement and understanding in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 38(1), 100–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples