Life on the Platform: Regulation, Algorithmic Control, And the Human Costs of India’s Gig Economy

India’s gig economy has expanded rapidly, providing an entry into city jobs, but also shifting the risks of running a business onto workers. This article qualitatively analyses the structural precarity of platform labour in India from a socio-legal perspective using secondary data from policy documents, legislative texts, and published empirical studies. It goes beyond abstract notions of flexibility to consider the tangible human costs of digital labour such as operating costs borne by the labour, job and income insecurity, uncertain working hours, occupational safety and health risks, and digital surveillance and algorithmic control. The paper discusses how algorithmic management implements control via task allocation, pricing, real-time monitoring, customer ratings, incentives, and account deactivation. It also maps the trajectory of India’s regulatory environment by comparing the national Code on Social Security (2020) with state legislation in Rajasthan and Karnataka. The article distinguishes between formal legal recognition (de jure) and how these protections are implemented, enforced, and accessed by workers in practice (de facto). The article also proposes a few recommendations addressing the underlying human costs. It concludes by noting that the future of platform economy will depend on whether policy regulations can do more than just recognise the problems faced by workers or not.

Gig Economy, Platforms, Precarity, Labour, Gig Workers, Human Cost

1. Agrawal, D., & Bhukya, R. (2022). Effects of the GIG economy on the workplace: A contemporary Indian perspective study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 2701-2718. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aloisi, A. (2016). Commoditized workers: Case study research on labour law issues arising from a set of “on-demand/gig economy” platforms. Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 653-690. Commoditized Workers. Case Study Research on Labour Law Issues Arising from a Set of 'On-Demand/Gig Economy' Platforms by Antonio Aloisi :: SSRN [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Behl, A., Rajagopal, K., Sheorey, P., & Mahendra, A. (2022). Barriers to entry of gig workers in the gig platforms: Exploring the dark side of the gig economy. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74(5), 818-839. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2021-0235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Behl, A., Dutta, P., Lessmann, S., Pandey, B. R., & Singh, R. (2022). Gig economy and drivers’ precarity: An empirical study on app-based cab drivers in India. Journal of Business Research, 148, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Business Standard. (2024, October 8). BigBasket, Urban Company lead in fair pay; most platforms fall short. Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/companies/news/bigbasket-urban-company-lead-in-fair-pay-most-platforms-fall-short-124100800378_1.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chaudhary, R. (2020). India’s emerging gig economy: The future of work for women workers. IWWAGE. IWWAGE-Gig-Economy-Report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chattopadhyay, S. (2024). The gig economy in India: Legislative approaches for urgent social security reforms. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law, 4(6), 293–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Elias, A., & Gómez, G. M. (2025). Digital platforms as institutional actors in the Global South – Evidence from India’s informal sector. Digital Geography and Society, 9, Article 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fairwork. (2023). Gender and platform work: Beyond techno-solutionism. Oxford Internet Institute. https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2023/10/Fairwork-Gender-Report-2023-FINAL-red.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fairwork India. (2024). Fairwork India ratings 2024: Labour standards in the platform economy. Oxford Internet Institute. https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2024/10/Fairwork_India_Report_2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Faras, F., Mehta, B. S., & Datta, A. (2025). Platform-based gig work in India’s labour statistics. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 68, 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-025-00566-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Goyal, T., & Rangaswamy, N. (2024). Unveiling two-fold gamification: Exploring the agency of delivery workers in urban India. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS ’24) (pp. 117–126). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3674829.3675066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Government of Karnataka. (2025). The Karnataka Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Act, 2025. Government of Karnataka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Heeks, R., Graham, M., Mungai, P., Van Belle, J.-P., & Woodcock, J. (2021). Systematic evaluation of gig work against decent work standards: The development and application of the Fairwork framework. The Information Society, 37(5), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1942356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Komarraju, S. A., Arora, P., & Raman, U. (2022). Agency and servitude in platform labour: A feminist analysis of blended cultures. Media, Culture & Society, 44(4), 672-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211029890 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Komarraju, S. A., Saini, G. K., & Sharma, R. (2022). Platformization of domestic and personal care work: Examining urban company in India. Gender, Technology and Development, 26(3), 412–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2111105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lata, L. N., Burdon, J., & Reddel, T. (2023). New tech, old exploitation: Gig economy, algorithmic control and migrant labour. Sociology Compass, 17(1), e13028. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Malhotra, P., & Agrawal, M. (2025). Dislike and survival: Work-related dynamics of gig platform workers in India. New Technology, Work and Employment, 40(3), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Medappa, K. (2023). Rethinking mutual aid through the lens of social reproduction: How platform drivers ride out work and life in Bengaluru, India. Journal of South Asian Development, 18(3), 383-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731741231162450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Montgomery, T., & Baglioni, S. (2021). Defining the gig economy: Platform capitalism and the reinvention of precarious work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(9/10), 1012-1025. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2020-0400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nair, G. (2023). The political economy of gig work in the pandemic: Social hierarchies and labour control of Indian platform workers. Journal of South Asian Development, 18(3), 409-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731741231202185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. NITI Aayog. (2022). India’s booming gig and platform economy: Perspectives and recommendations on the future of work. NITI Aayog, Government of India. Policy_Brief_India's_Booming_Gig_and_Platform_Economy_27062022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Parth, S., & Bathini, D. R. (2021). Microtargeting control: Explicating algorithmic control and nudges in platform-mediated cab driving in India. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(1), 74-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Parwez, S. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic and work precarity at digital food platforms: A delivery worker’s perspective. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 5(1), 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Raval, N. A. (2020). Platform-living: Theorizing life, work and ethical living after the gig economy (Publication No. 28028710) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4qc0x3mw [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ray, A. (2024). Coping with crisis and precarity in the gig economy: ‘Digitally organised informality’, migration and socio-spatial networks among platform drivers in India. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(4), 1227-1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231220296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labour and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758-3784. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sasaki, S. (2024, March 20). Digital labour platforms can advance social justice by focussing on worker welfare. International Labour Organization. Digital labour platforms can advance social justice by focussing on worker welfare | International Labour Organization [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sharma, P. (2021). Contested social relations in the platform economy: Class structurisation and collectivisation in ride-hailing services in India. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 15(2), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.2.0025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Singh, R., & Kaur, P. (2022). Precarity and everyday life in India’s gig economy: Voices of platform workers. Journal of Labour and Society, 25(3), 211-214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 5675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions