Linking Digital Infrastructure, Digital Business Model Innovation, and Performance: Insights from Tunisian Entrepreneurs

The accelerated shift toward digitalization has reinforced the strategic importance of leveraging digital infrastructures and rethinking business models for SMEs and entrepreneurs seeking to enhance competitiveness and performance in an increasingly uncertain environment. This study investigates how digital business model innovation (DBMI) contributes to improving SME performance, with a specific focus on the enabling role of digital infrastructure (DI) and its implications for entrepreneurial activities. A quantitative survey was conducted among 209 Tunisian entrepreneurs managing SMEs, selected using a convenience sampling technique. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares—Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that a robust digital infrastructure significantly stimulates DBMI, which in turn enhances organizational performance (OP). Furthermore, DI was found to strengthen entrepreneurs’ capabilities to redesign value creation, delivery, and capture mechanisms within their ventures. This research contributes to the literature on digital transformation, entrepreneurship, and business model innovation in emerging economies. It also offers actionable insights for entrepreneurs and SME managers seeking to leverage digital technologies to foster sustainable growth, enhance competitiveness, and adapt to rapidly evolving market conditions.

Business Model, Digital Business Model Innovation

1. Abuseta, Y., Elshaiekh, M., & Alrawi, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence capabilities and organizational transformation. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allwein, R., & Venters, W. (2017). Digital infrastructure and knowledge management in organizations. Information Systems Journal, 27(3), 321–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andreini, D., Bettinelli, C., Foss, N., & Verona, G. (2022). Business model innovation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 48(1), 189–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arany, A., & Popovics, A. (2024). Digital business model innovation and firm competitiveness. Technovation, 132, 102716. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arnold, G. (2021). Does entrepreneurship work? Understanding what policy entrepreneurs do and whether it matters. Policy Studies Journal, 49(4), 968-991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Autio, E., & Rannikko, H. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystems and business model innovation. Small Business Economics, 61(4), 1721–1743. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Balhadj, N., & El Moudden, A. (2022). Organizational performance: Determinants and evaluation metrics. Management Review Journal, 34(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ben Arfi, W., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2023). Digital transformation and SME performance in North Africa. Information & Management, 60(2), 103708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bhatti, A., Aslam, U., & Bashir, M. (2022a). Digital infrastructure and SME performance: The role of technology adoption. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(4), 567–585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bhatti, A., Aslam, U., & Bashir, M. (2022b). Enabling innovation in SMEs through digital infrastructure: Evidence from developing economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Boumahdi, M. (2022). Performance organisationnelle et création de valeur dans les entreprises contemporaines. Editions Universitaires. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bouquin, H. (2004). Management et performance des organisations. Paris: Economica. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bourguignon, A. (1997). Performance financière et pilotage de l’entreprise. Economica. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Brahim, A., & Oubrahimi, S. (2025). Holistic approaches to organizational performance: Integrating culture, innovation, and stakeholder engagement. International Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021). Digital technologies and business model innovation in SMEs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 171, 120939. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Broccardo, L., Culasso, F., & Truant, E. (2023). The role of digital technologies in sustainable business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cheng, J., Liu, S., & Wang, X. (2014). Digital infrastructures as drivers of innovation: Knowledge sharing and performance implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1065–1085. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2014-0100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Christofi, M., Leonidou, E., & Vrontis, D. (2024). Digital transformation and strategic renewal in SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 124, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cohen, N. (2025). Policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting. In Handbook of public policy agenda setting (pp. 170-184). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Corrêa, V. S., Lima, R. M. D., Brito, F. R. D. S., Machado, M. C., & Nassif, V. M. J. (2024). Female entrepreneurship in emerging and developing countries: A systematic review of practical and policy implications and suggestions for new studies. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 16(2), 366-395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Kaiser, S., & Wilczynski, P. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between formative and reflective measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS quarterly, 39(2), 297-316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Dohou-Renaud, C. (2007). L’évolution de la performance organisationnelle: De la finance à la multidimensionnalité. Revue Française de Gestion, 33(5), 47–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Dong, J. Q., Holsapple, C., & Sun, Y. (2024). Digital technology assimilation and organizational redesign. MIS Quarterly, 48(1), 143–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Du, Z. Y., & Wang, Q. (2024). Digital infrastructure and innovation: Digital divide or digital dividend?. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3), 100542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hussain, H., Jun, W., & Radulescu, M. (2025). Innovation performance in the digital divide context: Nexus of digital infrastructure, digital innovation, and E-knowledge. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 3772-3792. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109–133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Karamti, C., & Abd-Mouleh, N. W. (2023). Finding entrepreneurial opportunities in times of crisis: Evidence from Tunisia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(3), 3519-3548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Krenz, L., Müller, P., & Schmitz, J. (n.d.). Digital foundations for innovation in SMEs. Manuscript submitted for publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Li, M., & Li, Y. (2025). Investigating the interrelationships of technological pedagogical readiness using PLS-SEM: A study of primary mathematics teachers in China. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., & Vogelsang, K. (2018). Drivers of digital transformation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(5), 365–371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Maâlej, N., & Affes, H. (2023). Innovation and organizational performance: A comprehensive perspective. Journal of Business and Innovation Studies, 15(1), 78–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mancuso, M., Rossi, M., & De Luca, L. (2023). Digital business model innovation: A strategic lever for competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mohamed, F. (2025). The impact of social media, entrepreneurial orientation and managerial networks on the performance of Tunisian SMEs. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Morabito, V. (2014). Digital business strategy and value creation: Framing the dynamic cycle of control points. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Müller, J. M. (2019). Barriers to digital transformation in SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1127–1148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Nambisan, S., Siegel, D., & Kenney, M. (2019). On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(3), 354–368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Omrani, N., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Tarhini, A. (2024). Digital readiness and SME resilience. International Journal of Information Management, 76, 102666. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Otmani, M., & Benkaraache, A. (2019). Performance organisationnelle: Concepts, dimensions et enjeux. Revue Internationale de Gestion, 45(3), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ovrelid, R., & Kempton, L. (2020). Bridging the digital divide through infrastructure development. Information Systems Journal, 30(5), 707–731. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Poláková-Kersten, A., Lorenz, S., & Viete, S. (2023). Organizational culture and digital transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(7), 1123–1142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Queiroz, M., Fosso Wamba, S., & Brezinski, G. (2020). Digital infrastructure and innovation performance: Evidence from SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2019). Digitalization and business model innovation. Sustainability, 11(2), 314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Rherib, R., Otmani, M., & Benkaraache, A. (2021). Multidimensional approaches to organizational performance: Literature review and perspectives. Management & Research Journal, 28(4), 12–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Sabatini, A., Reilly, P., & Nguyen, H. (2022). Big data analytics and value creation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31(3), 101728. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Seheda, I. (2019). Analysis of Tunisian experience in legal regulation of startups. Law Rev. Kyiv UL, 270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Shenglin, B., et al. (2017). Digital infrastructure and inclusive digital development. Journal of Digital Economy, 5(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Silva, C., Da Silva, F., & Cunha, M. (2022). SME digital transformation challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101716. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Singh, A., & Anees, M. (2025). Organizational culture and digital transformation: A capability-based view. Information Systems Journal, 35(1), 85–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Soufeljil, M., Zorgati, H., & Lakhal, L. (2025). Knowledge management and innovation in the certified family SME: the mediating role of TQM. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Souissi, M. (2025). Towards a Better Understanding of the Factors of Entrepreneurial Failure: An Exploratory Study among Entrepreneurs in the Sfax Region, Tunisia. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 16-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Teoh, S. Y., Lim, C., & Wong, K. (2025). Digital business model innovation: Core elements and pathways to value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Thurik, A. R., Audretsch, D. B., Block, J. H., Burke, A., Carree, M. A., Dejardin, M., ... & Wiklund, J. (2024). The impact of entrepreneurship research on other academic fields. Small Business Economics, 62(2), 727-751. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Träskman, P., & Skoog, M. (2022). Digital infrastructure as a strategic enabler for SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 60(1), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Usman, F. O., Kess-Momoh, A. J., Ibeh, C. V., Elufioye, A. E., Ilojianya, V. I., & Oyeyemi, O. P. (2024). Entrepreneurial innovations and trends: A global review: Examining emerging trends, challenges, and opportunities in the field of entrepreneurship, with a focus on how technology and globalization are shaping new business ventures. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1), 552-569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Van Tonder, C., Bossink, B., Schachtebeck, C., & Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2024). The effect of digitally-driven business model innovation on business performance. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 36(6), 944-977. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2019). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(1), 1–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Rethinking digital transformation capabilities. Journal of Information Technology, 40(1), 52–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Wen, J., Lv, Z., & Gu, B. (2023). Digital infrastructure development and inclusive digital transformation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. (2024). Digital entrepreneurship and opportunity creation. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 48(2), 419–452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Zarkua, T., Heijman, W., Benešová, I., & Krivko, M. (2025). Entrepreneurship as a driver of economic development. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 13(1), 61-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Zhang, L., Chen, C., & Wang, X. (2022). Digital divide and infrastructure resilience. Telecommunications Policy, 46(7), 102–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits