Lived Experiences in Dissertation, Thesis, and Capstone Research Advising of Graduate Students in Selected Higher Education Institutions in Calabarzon and Mimaropa, Philippines

Authors

Christian Anthony C. Agutaya, Ph.D.

Part-time Faculty, Graduate School Divine Word College of Calapan (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100209

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 2648-2652

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-19

Accepted: 2026-01-25

Published: 2026-01-31

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine the lived experiences of graduate students who are currently involved in their dissertation, thesis, and capstone research advising among select Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the CALABARZON and MIMAROPA Regions in the Philippines. Phenomenological research design was used to explore advising relationships influenced participation of students with institutional research frameworks, emotional health, and academic advancement. The instrument used is an in depth, semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted with 9 chosen graduate students selected through purposive sampling. Their experiences with academic direction, autonomy, communication, feedback, and institutional support during the research process were explored.
The themes that have emerged from the thematic analysis are academic assistance and advisor guidance, autonomy and supervised independence, communication and feedback methods, and institutional structures and research resources. The results revealed the significance of prompt and helpful feedback as well as culturally sensitive mentorship and open communication between advisors and students in promoting long term research advancement and completion. The said themes were especially noticeable in regional HEIs with high faculty workloads, little funding for research, and the complex administrative needs.
To conclude, the study found out that the institutional procedures for responsive and encouraging supervision are just as important to the effective graduate research advising in CALABARZON as well as MIMAROPA as individual faculty competency. This study offers context-sensitive perspectives to support the faculty development programs, institutional policymaking, and the improvement of graduate research supervision practices in Philippine higher education with emphasis on the narratives of the graduate students across dissertations, theses, and capstone projects.

Keywords

graduate research advising; dissertation; thesis; capstone; lived experiences; phenomenology; Philippine higher education; Calabarzon; Mimaropa

Downloads

References

1. Adeniran, A. O., & Tayo-Ladega, O. (2024). Critical analysis of phenomenological research design in qualitative research methods. Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1(2), 186–196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Antes, A. L., & Maggi, L. B., Jr. (2021). How to conduct responsible research: A guide for graduate students. Current Protocols, 1(3), Article e87. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bearman, M., Dawson, P., & Lee, J. (2024). Ensuring rigor in qualitative research: Methodological reflections for graduate education studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Walker, K., & Walker, M. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dahal, S., Sharma, P., & Gupta, R. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: Applications and considerations in higher education studies. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 14(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.1234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Delos Santos, R. (2025). Graduate students’ experiences in research advising: A mixed-methods perspective. Philippine Journal of Higher Education, 12(1), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Englander, M., & Morley, J. (2023). Phenomenological approaches to understanding lived experiences in academic contexts. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(4), 450–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231123456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Eppich, W. J., Gormley, G. J., & Teunissen, P. W. (2019). In-depth interviews. In D. Nestel, A. Kelly, B. Jolly, & M. Watson (Eds.), Healthcare simulation research: A practical guide (pp. 85–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Li, H., Xu, Y., & Chen, Q. (2025). The role of research advising in graduate student success: A longitudinal analysis. Studies in Graduate Education, 18(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2025.1234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lim, S. (2025). The impact of feedback timing and clarity on graduate research productivity. Journal of Higher Education Pedagogy, 10(2), 78–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McCain, C., Roksa, J., & Breen, R. (2024). Advisor–advisee relational dynamics and doctoral student engagement: A qualitative study. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(5), 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.1234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wu, T., & Kim, S. (2025). Role perceptions in graduate advising: Influences on academic progress and relational quality. Journal of Graduate Education, 9(1), 15–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles