Lived Experiences of Filipino Rice Farmers in Contract Farming Arrangements

Authors

Sheila G. Perales

Negros Occidental Irrigation Management Office (Philippines)

Raymund L. Santiago

La Carlota City College (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800299

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 4538-4551

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-20

Accepted: 2026-08-25

Published: 2026-09-02

Abstract

This phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of Filipino rice farmers participating in contract farming arrangements. Seven (7) purposively selected rice farmers served as participants in the study. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis. Findings revealed that contract farming improved access to farm inputs, financial assistance, technical support, and market opportunities while presenting challenges related to implementation, input delivery, and contractual obligations. The study concludes that strengthening program implementation and institutional support can further enhance farmers' productivity, livelihood, resilience, and overall well-being through sustainable contract farming initiatives.

Keywords

Contract Farming; Filipino Rice Farmers; Lived Experiences; Sustainable Agriculture; Thematic Analysis

Downloads

References

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Darnhofer, I. (2021). Resilience or how do we enable agricultural systems to ride the waves of unexpected change? Agricultural Systems, 187, 102997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). Contract farming and inclusive agricultural value chains. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hambloch, C. (2022). Contract farming and everyday acts of resistance: Oil palm contract farmers in the Philippines. Journal of Agrarian Change, 22(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ho, T. T. T., et al. (2021). Perceptions, problems and prospects of contract farming: Insights from rice production in Vietnam. Proceedings, 9(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2021009006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hoang, V. (2021). Impact of contract farming on farmers’ income in the food value chain: A theoretical analysis and empirical study in Vietnam. Agriculture, 11(8), 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Manevska-Tasevska, G., Petitt, A., Larsson, S., Bimbilovski, I., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Feindt, P. H., & Urquhart, J. (2021). Adaptive governance and resilience capacity of farms: The fit between farmers’ decisions and agricultural policies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 668836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.668836 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ray, N., Clarke, G., & Waley, P. (2021). The impact of contract farming on the welfare and livelihoods of farmers: A village case study from West Bengal. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles