Lived Experiences of Teachers in the Implementation of the Strengthened Senior High School Curriculum: A Phenomenological Study

Curriculum reforms are intended to improve learning outcomes. However, it is the teachers that are directly affected by these changes and often encounter challenges in translating policy into practice. This study explored the lived experiences of senior high school teachers in implementing the Strengthened Senior High School (SHS) Curriculum. The study was conducted in a public senior high school in the Schools Division of Misamis Occidental during the school year 2025-2026. A qualitative design was used to capture lived experiences from the eight senior high school teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered through a semi‑structured interview guide and analyzed through Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis. Findings of the study yielded the following themes: curriculum design and resource constraints; institutional gaps in curriculum implementation; impacts on teachers’ professional performance and teaching-learning outcomes; instructional adaptation and collaborative learning engagement. The study concludes that the strengthened SHS curriculum faces major implementation challenges due to misalignment, resource constraints, and institutional gaps, requiring stronger systemic support and teacher development. The study recommends to the strengthen curriculum implementation by enhancing school-level support, collaboration, and continuous professional development for teachers.

coping strategies, curriculum challenges, instructional adaptation, streamline curriculum, teacher experiences

1. Abenes, R. D., & Esperancilla, E. J. D. (2025). From Theory to Practice: Gert Biesta’s Educational Telos in the Philippines' MATATAG Curriculum. Lukad: An Online Journal of Pedagogy, 20-44. https://tinyurl.com/4aux9x5y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Angleo, F. A. (2025, July 26). ‘FALLBACK, NOT PASSION’: PHL teacher training undermined by gaps and low participation. Daily Guardian. https://tinywebs.site/iV1hSJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Argate, R., Ferrater-Gimena, J., Sagayno, R., Ortega, M., Mamacos, R., Miro, A., Montenegro, C., Janiola, F., & Sumalinog, G. (2024). Senior high school program implementation in Cebu, Philippines: The teachers’ perspectives. HCMCOUJS-Social Sciences, 14(2), 3-17. https://tinyurl.com/2achjpha [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aspers, P., Corte, U. (2021). What is Qualitative in Research. Qualitative Sociology. 44, 599–608 https://tinyurl.com/mwbyt3kr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Assessment, Curriculum and Technology Research Centre. (2025). Senior High School curriculum review: Phase 1 (Vol. 1). ACTRC. https://tinyurl.com/yc5excwp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bacus, R. C., & Alda, R. C. (2022). Senior high school teaching: A phenomenological inquiry. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 19(1), 242-276 https://tinyurl.com/2enf4bdr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Balasi A, Iordanidis G (2026;), "Developing primary schools as professional learning communities: the “why” and “how”". The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 1-22. https://tinyurl.com/55bz796s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://tinyurl.com/mapfzz3a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://tinyurl.com/4as5x5w5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26071r6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ceremonia-Cerda, J. (2024). Contextual analysis of curriculum development in the Philippines: Progress and challenges. Global Scientific Journals (CSJ), 12, 11. https://share.google/Gxew4jiTxIAMNKbgE [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Degorio, J. M. L. (2022). Teaching in the K12 Science Spiral Curriculum: An Experiential Approach. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(2), 97-108. https://tinyurl.com/5dskmtbk [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2024, December 17). DepEd swiftly moves to implement ARAL Program Act to tackle learning loss. https://tinyurl.com/mt4t5pep [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education. (2025, June 13). DepEd Order No. 018, s. 2025: Implementing guidelines of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning Program. https://tinyurl.com/3xfw2hht [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education. (2025, June 14). DepEd Memorandum No. 048, s. 2025: Pilot implementation of the Strengthened Senior High School Curriculum for Grade 11 in School Year 2025–2026. https://tinyurl.com/bdz99twf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Department of Education. (2025). The Strengthened Senior High School Program Shaping Paper. https://tinyurl.com/5xuj8e88 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Diquito, T. (2024). Basic education curriculum under the newly implemented K to 10 (MATATAG) curriculum in the philippines: the case of science education. American Journal of Education and Technology (AJET), 3(3), 123-132. https://tinyurl.com/dw6y3d3r [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dursun, F., & Aykan, A. (2025). Exploring teachers’ narratives: Challenges and strategies for enhancing the teaching process. SAGE Open, 15(1), 1–21. https://tinyurl.com/3z8kwk36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Estrellado, C. J. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum: Why Curriculum [must] Change?. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1), 6-10. https://tinyurl.com/ypjkf5ex [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ghasemi, F., Herman, K.C. & Reinke, W.M. (2023). Shifts in Stressors, Internalizing Symptoms, and Coping Mechanisms of Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. School Mental Health 15, 272–286. https://tinyurl.com/mrykrn3t [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gürhan, E. (2026). Workload-Mediated Teacher Agency in Curriculum Adaptation: Practice-Based Evidence from Turkish Primary Schools. Journal of Elementary Education Research and Practice, 2(1), 31-45. https://tinyurl.com/yc2x5w8n [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Herrera, N. J. N. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing the MATATAG Curriculum: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(2), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.02.35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hendrickx, M.M.H.G., Thurlings, M.C.G. & Den Brok, P. (2025) Teachers’ collaborative knowledge building in professional learning communities: connecting interaction patterns to learning gains. European Journal of Psychology of Educcation. 40, 39. https://tinyurl.com/56uez9m6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Igcasama, R. M. (2021). TEACHERS AND STUDENTS’PERCEPTIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF K-12 SPIRAL PROGRESSION APPROACH. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 5(1), 116-124. https://tinyurl.com/ymzpsn69 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ignacio, A. A., & Bajet, A. P. (2025). Assessing the implementation of senior high school mathematics curriculum: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions in Calbayog City Division, Philippines. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 61–65. https://tinyurl.com/2ck7nasa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Karakus, G. (2021). A literary review on curriculum implementation problems. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 201-220. https://tinyurl.com/9nb2yyuj [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Khasawneh, Y. J. A. ., Alsarayreh, R. ., Ajlouni, A. A. A., Eyadat, H. M. ., Ayasrah, M. N. ., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. . (2023). An examination of teacher collaboration in professional learning communities and collaborative teaching practices. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(3), 446–452. https://tinyurl.com/mamt68fy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://tinyurl.com/33ytjn2z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Abellanosa, C., Villaver Jr, M., Uy, F., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). MATATAG curriculum rollout: Understanding challenges for effective implementation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 172-177. https://tinyurl.com/9nw8pdw6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Konstantinos, G. (2024). Thematic analysis: A practical guide: by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, Los Angeles, USA, Sage Publications, 2022, 376 pp., $ 27.59 (paperback), ISBN-13: 978-1473953246. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 26(3–4), 461–464. https://tinyurl.com/3dsxmrd6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lapidot-Lefler, N. (2025). Teacher Responsiveness in Inclusive Education: A Participatory Study of Pedagogical Practice, Well-Being, and Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(7), 2919. https://tinyurl.com/2jdcfbhr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of personality, 1(3), 141-169. https://tinyurl.com/52msp426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lemesaya, J. M. (2026). The role of professional learning communities on teacher professional development: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 18(1), 26-36. https://tinyurl.com/24zu4kfe [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lenhoff, S.W., Singer, J. & Gottfried, M. (2022) Thinking Ecologically in Educational Policy and Research, Peabody Journal of Education, 97:1, 1-5. https://tinyurl.com/3kzpu8np [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Leswell, M. (2025). The Shift to Adaptive Teaching: A Research-informed Guide. Journal of the Chartered College of Teaching, (24). https://tinyurl.com/3dye4vub [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Liu R, Liu F, Li R and Jing B (2026) How does teacher collaboration drive technology adoption? A PLS-SEM analysis of PISA 2022 data. Frontiers in Psychology. 17:1790345. https://tinyurl.com/44my9wtu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mangabon, L. (2025). School heads’ administrative & instructional leadership skills, performance of teachers and challenges in the transition of the Matatag curriculum. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies. 5(7), 692-717 https://tinywebs.site/AYvs9t [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Miles, D. A. (2017, August). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps. In Doctoral student workshop: finding research gaps-research methods and strategies, Dallas, Texas (Vol. 1, pp. 1-10). https://tinyurl.com/ysfb8xa5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ochoa, N. C., Alfaro, L., Casquero, K., Villamil, J., Burgos, C., & Calapan, R. (2024). Challenges, strategies, and the level of pedagogical content knowledge of senior high school teachers: Inputs for a professional development plan. International Conference on Community Engagement and Public Health (ICCEPH). https://tinyurl.com/43brzxet [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Padillo, G. G., Manguilimotan, R. P., Capuno, R. G., & Espina, R. C. (2021). Professional Development Activities and Teacher Performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497-506. https://tinyurl.com/bdzn72zm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Rahman, L. (2025). Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory in Childhood Resilience and Motivation in Learning: A Literature Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 550-561. https://tinyurl.com/5823w44u [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. RAND Corporation. (2026). American Instructional Resources Survey (AIRS) project. RAND Education, Employment, and Infrastructure. https://tinyurl.com/56y8fphz [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Richter, Eric & Fütterer, Tim & Meyer, André & Eisenkraft, Arthur & Fischer, Christian. (2022). Teacher Collaboration and Professional Learning. Examining Professional Development During a National Education Reform. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. 68. 798-819. https://tinyurl.com/y55dywmw [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Savage, M., & Woloshyn, V. (2022). Coping is crucial: Exploring relations between K-12 educators and staff coping strategies, perceived stress and psychological wellbeing. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 14(2), 3–18. https://tinyurl.com/y2t6ardw [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Singh, A.K. & Singh, M. (2026). Predictive Role of Coping Strategies in Psychological Well-Being and Social Adjustment among Teachers. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 14(1), 1768-1785. https://tinyurl.com/55p786d5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Thomas, P., & Onyango, D. O. (2022). Administrative Challenges Preventing Effective Curriculum Implementation in Public Secondary Schools in Nyamagana District - Mwanza City, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.5.1.568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Tirol, S. L. (2022). Spiral progression approach in the kto 12 science curriculum: a literature review. International Journal of Education (IJE), 10(4). https://tinyurl.com/8hk3hkxc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tong, P. & An I.S. (2024) Review of studies applying Bronfenbrenner's bioecological theory in international and intercultural education research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1233925. https://tinyurl.com/86erntxc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Veliganio, J., Ellaga, E. ., Amang, D. J. ., & Genobiagon, C. B. (2024). Senior High School Curriculum Implementation: Challenges and Experiences of Teachers. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(10), 441-451. https://tinyurl.com/muva5jsu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wildan, K., Kurniawan, R. A., & Fatriani, E. (2026). Curriculum transitions and teacher adaptability: Examining experience, school demographics, and pedagogical challenges in Indonesia. Curriculum Perspective. https://tinyurl.com/366nwbx8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Xhemajli, A., Malaj, F., & Mehmeti, L. (2025). Current challenges of implementing the new curriculum in primary education. International Journal of Educational Reform, 34(3), 605-621. https://tinyurl.com/rspxf2m6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zhao, L., Zhao, B. & Li, C. (2023) Alignment analysis of teaching–learning-assessment within the classroom: how teachers implement project-based learning under the curriculum standards. Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res 5, 13. https://tinyurl.com/y4nfx3vu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zendrato, J., & Agatha, D. C. (2023). An analysis of Merdeka Curriculum implementation in Indonesia: A case study of facilitating students’ transformation. Jurnal Shanan, 7(2), 227-242. https://tinyurl.com/va6453j7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study