Living Between School and Soil: A Phenomenological Study of Student Farmers’ Academic Lives in Rural Mankayan

Authors

Wilbert B. Wanas

Department of Education – Guinaoang National High School (Philippines)

Gwayne G. Mendoza

Department of Education – Guinaoang National High School (Philippines)

Norio Jr. B. Bayanes

Department of Education – Guinaoang National High School (Philippines)

Zyril Nicole L. Buli-e

Department of Education – Guinaoang National High School (Philippines)

Ashley S. Mahay

Department of Education – Guinaoang National High School (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300120

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 1729-1743

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-19

Accepted: 2026-03-24

Published: 2026-03-28

Abstract

This qualitative study explored the lived academic and farming experiences of student farmers enrolled in a public senior high school in Mankayan, Benguet. Anchored in a phenomenological–thematic approach, the research sought to understand how student farmers experience schooling while simultaneously engaging in sustained agricultural work, the challenges they encounter, the strategies they use to cope, and how these experiences shape their personal growth and motivation.
Ten senior high school student farmers participated in in depth, semi structured interviews. Data were analyzed using a phenomenological–thematic procedure informed by Colaizzi’s method, allowing shared meanings to emerge from participants’ narratives while preserving the integrity of their lived experiences. Analysis revealed that academic life for student farmers is characterized by persistence under constrained conditions, shaped by time scarcity, physical fatigue, and overlapping responsibilities between school and farm work.
Findings showed that student farmers cope through personal discipline, deliberate time management, family support, and situational school based consideration. Rather than disengaging from schooling, participants actively sustained academic participation by adapting routines and prioritizing responsibilities. Farming experiences also contributed to personal growth, fostering responsibility, resilience, independence, and strengthened motivation to continue schooling. Hardship was not viewed solely as a burden but was reframed as a source of meaning and direction.
The study concludes that the academic experiences of student farmers are inseparable from their agricultural responsibilities and community context. Education is lived alongside labor, shaping how students construct meaning, manage challenges, and envision their future. The findings highlight the importance of understanding student farmers’ experiences holistically and recognizing lived responsibility as an integral part of learning in rural and agricultural settings.

Keywords

student farmers, lived experience, phenomenological thematic analysis

Downloads

References

1. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Corbett, M. (2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Fernwood Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745–774. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. International Labour Organization. (2021). Child labour: Global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward. https://www.ilo.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Times Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Paul, K. I., & Moser, K. (2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Staff, J., Schulenberg, J. E., & Bachman, J. G. (2010). Adolescent work intensity, school performance, and academic engagement. Child Development, 81(2), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01383.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. https://www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Warren, J. R. (2002). Reconsidering the relationship between student employment and academic outcomes. Sociology of Education, 75(4), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. FAO. (2014). Youth and agriculture: Key challenges and concrete solutions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles