Asymmetric Inclusion in Rural Ghana: Participation and Belonging among Students with Physical Disabilities

This study examined how teacher preparation and instructional practice, school environmental features and material resources, and peer and co-curricular experiences shape the educational participation of students with physical disabilities in one rural Ghanaian basic school. A qualitative single embedded case study was conducted within an interpretivist paradigm. Participants comprised the complete population of students with physical disabilities enrolled at the school during fieldwork and two staff members occupying classroom and institutional leadership roles (N = 4). Data were generated through individual semi-structured interviews and analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were developed. First, staff described inclusive education primarily through admission, mixed grouping, classroom questioning, encouragement, and participation in academic competitions, while the interviews provided limited evidence of curriculum, pacing, assessment, or task adaptation. Second, the school environment supported general movement but did not consistently support physical autonomy. All four participants identified the school toilet as the clearest environmental difficulty, particularly because of its distance and squatting-type design. Third, students described positive peer relationships and academic participation alongside non-participation in sport, which they attributed to their physical conditions. Staff also described recurring teasing and efforts to manage such behaviour. The findings suggest an uneven pattern of inclusion in which relational and administrative dimensions were more visible than pedagogical, environmental, and activity-specific adaptations. This case-derived pattern is conceptualised as asymmetric inclusion, referring to the uneven development of different dimensions of inclusion within the same school because they require different forms of organisational, pedagogical, material, and environmental support. The study argues for monitoring systems that assess participation and adaptation rather than presence alone, teacher development focused on practical instructional adaptation, accessible sanitation, and meaningful pathways into physical activity and sport.

Inclusive education, Physical disability, Belonging, Participation, Physical activity, Accessibility, Ghana, Rural schools

1. Abu-Sadat, R. (2023). Accessibility to the faculty of educational studies building at the University of Education, Winneba: Experience of two wheelchair users. Equity in Education & Society, 4(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461231207400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ackah-Jnr, F. R., & Danso, J. (2019). Examining the physical environment of Ghanaian inclusive schools: How accessible, suitable and appropriate is such environment for inclusive education? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(2), 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1427808 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adugna, M., Ghahari, S., & Lysaght, R. (2024). Disability stigma and the pursuit of inclusion among children with physical disabilities in northwest Ethiopia. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(3), 676–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2356016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amponteng, M., Tracey, D., & Nketsia, W. (2025). Exploring teachers' concerns and recommendations regarding inclusive education in Ghana: An application of the ecological systems theory. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2541910 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arkorful, D. K., & Obeng, G. (2020). Strengthening inclusive education in Ghana. UNICEF Ghana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Asamoah, E., Amaniampong, E.-M., Manful, E., Gyasi-Boadu, N., & Koomson-Yalley, E. N. M. (2023). Using photovoice to illuminate challenges facing children with disabilities in inclusive education in Ghana. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v24i1.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Awini, A. (2025). Differentiated instruction as an inclusive practice: Addressing the needs of learners with visual impairment in Ghanaian basic schools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.905000404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Azupogo, U., Dassah, E., & Bisung, E. (2023). Promoting safe and inclusive water and sanitation services for students with physical disabilities in primary schools: A concept mapping study in Ghana. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bertills, K., & Björk, M. (2024). Facilitating regular physical education for students with disability: PE teachers' views. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, 1400192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1400192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. DeMatthews, D., Billingsley, B., McLeskey, J., & Sharma, U. (2020). Principal leadership for students with disabilities in effective inclusive schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Dawes, M., Barko-Alva, K., & Cross, J. R. (2019). Promoting inclusive communities in diverse classrooms: Teacher attunement and social dynamics management. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1635020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Genovesi, E., Jakobsson, C., Nugent, L., Hanlon, C., & Hoekstra, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder experiences, attitudes and perspectives on inclusive education for children with developmental disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Autism, 26(7), 1606–1625. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221096208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gyimah, E., Dassah, E., Opoku, M., Nketsia, W., & Mensah, P. A. (2025). "I prefer to be alone than to be among them": In-school experiences of learners with disabilities and their caregivers in inclusive schools in Ghana. British Journal of Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hamenoo, E. S., & Dayan, V. (2021). Inclusive education and disabilities: Narratives from Ghana. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development. https://doi.org/10.47985/dcidj.385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Juvonen, J., Lessard, L. M., Rastogi, R., Schacter, H. L., & Smith, D. S. (2019). Promoting social inclusion in educational settings: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & van Houten, E. (2009). Being part of the peer group: A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701284680 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kuyini, A. B., & Desai, I. (2008). Providing instruction to students with special needs in inclusive classrooms in Ghana: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 4(1), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Liu, X., Han, H., Li, Z., Huang, S., Zhao, Y., Xiao, Q., & Sun, J. (2025). Barriers and facilitators to participation in physical activity for students with disabilities in an integrated school setting: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research evidence. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1496631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1496631 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mantey, E. E. (2017). Discrimination against children with disabilities in mainstream schools in Southern Ghana: Challenges and perspectives from stakeholders. International Journal of Educational Development, 54, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mbelu, S. E., & Maguvhe, M. (2024). Evaluating the socioecological classroom in full-service schools: A whole-school approach to the inclusive education context in South Africa. Education Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ministry of Education, Ghana. (2015). Inclusive education policy. Special Education Division. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Naami, A. (2014). Breaking the barriers: Ghanaians' perspectives about the social model. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development, 25(1), 21–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Naami, A., & Mort, K. S.-T. (2023). Inclusive education in Ghana: How prepared are the teachers? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1056630. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1056630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ocran, J. (2022). "There is something like a barrier": Disability stigma, structural discrimination and middle-class persons with disability in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2084893 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Okyere, C., Aldersey, H., & Lysaght, R. (2019). The experiences of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive schools in Accra, Ghana. African Journal of Disability, 8. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Opoku, M. (2021). Exploring the intentions of school leaders towards implementing inclusive education in secondary schools in Ghana. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(3), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1889034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Opoku, M., Rayner, C., Pedersen, S., & Cuskelly, M. (2019). Mapping the evidence-based research on Ghana's inclusive education to policy and practices: A scoping review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(10), 1157–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1600055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Opoku-Nkoom, I., & Ackah-Jnr, F. R. (2023). Investigating inclusive education in primary schools in Ghana: What inclusive cultures, environment, and practices support implementation? Support for Learning, 38(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Schwab, S. (2017). The impact of contact on students' attitudes towards peers with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 62, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.01.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. UNESCO. (2020). Towards inclusion in education: Status, trends and challenges. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Yahaya, M., Braimah, I., Adu-Gyamfi, A., & Nanor, M. A. (2025). Built environment of basic schools and performance outcomes in rural Ghana: Learners' voice. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00483-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study