Managing Conditional Electric Vehicle Adoption Intention in Malaysia: Evidence from Non-Owner Drivers

Electric-vehicle (EV) adoption requires more than environmental awareness; potential users must also perceive that charging, financial, and technological conditions make ownership workable. This study examines conditional EV adoption intention among 384 Malaysian licensed drivers who did not own an EV. Four positively worded managerial conditions—infrastructure readiness, financial attractiveness, technological readiness, and environmental value—were assessed through a cross-sectional questionnaire. All four correlated positively with conditional adoption intention (r=.685 to .791, p<.001) and remained significant in a simultaneous regression that explained 72.7% of the variance in intention (R²=.727). Environmental value had the largest unstandardized coefficient (B = .380), ahead of financial attractiveness, infrastructure readiness, and technological readiness; notably, infrastructure readiness recorded the highest mean agreement but the weakest correlation with intention, suggesting a ceiling effect once reliable charging is treated as a baseline expectation rather than a differentiator. Managers and policymakers should therefore coordinate reliable charging, transparent total-cost propositions, credible technology assurances, and verifiable environmental value, with the last carrying particular weight. Because the outcome items explicitly describe improved conditions, the results represent conditional receptiveness rather than unconditional purchase intention or actual adoption.

electric vehicles; adoption intention; charging infrastructure; financial incentives; technology readiness

1. S. Asadi, M. Nilashi, S. Samad, R. Abdullah, M. Mahmoud, M. H. Alkinani and E. Yadegaridehkordi, “Factors impacting consumers' intention toward adoption of electric vehicles in Malaysia,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 282, 124474, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. S. Asadi, M. Nilashi, M. Iranmanesh et al., “Drivers and barriers of electric vehicle usage in Malaysia: A DEMATEL approach,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 177, 105965, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. P. Bryła, S. Chatterjee and B. Ciabiada-Bryła, “Consumer adoption of electric vehicles: A systematic literature review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 1, 205, 2023, doi:10.3390/en16010205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. S. Y. He, S. Luo and K. K. Sun, “Factors affecting electric vehicle adoption intention: The impact of objective, perceived, and prospective charger accessibility,” Journal of Transport and Land Use, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 779–801, 2022, doi:10.5198/jtlu.2022.2113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. N. A. Q. Muzir, M. R. H. Mojumder, M. Hasanuzzaman and J. Selvaraj, “Challenges of electric vehicles and their prospects in Malaysia: A comprehensive review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, 8320, 2022, doi:10.3390/su14148320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. I. Veza et al., “Electric vehicles in Malaysia and Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 7, 2564, 2022, doi:10.3390/en15072564. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. A. Pamidimukkala, S. Kermanshachi, J. M. Rosenberger and G. Hladik, “Evaluation of barriers to electric vehicle adoption: A study of technological, environmental, financial, and infrastructure factors,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 22, 100962, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.trip.2023.100962. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. N. Virmani, V. Agarwal, K. Karuppiah and S. Luthra, “Mitigating barriers to adopting electric vehicles in an emerging economy context,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 414, 137557, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137557. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. P. Manutworakit and K. Choocharukul, “Factors influencing battery electric vehicle adoption in Thailand—expanding the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology's variables,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, 8482, 2022, doi:10.3390/su14148482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. L. M. Austmann and S. A. Vigne, “Does environmental awareness fuel the electric vehicle market? A Twitter keyword analysis,” Energy Economics, vol. 101, 105337, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. Vafaei-Zadeh, T.-K. Wong, H. Hanifah, A. P. Teoh and K. Nawaser, “Modelling electric vehicle purchase intention among Generation Y consumers in Malaysia,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 43, 100784, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100784. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. H. Khazaei and M. A. Tareq, “Moderating effects of personal innovativeness and driving experience on factors influencing adoption of BEVs in Malaysia: An integrated SEM–BSEM approach,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 9, e08072, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08072. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. G. Ivanova and A. C. Moreira, “Antecedents of electric vehicle purchase intention from the consumer's perspective: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, 2878, 2023, doi:10.3390/su15042878. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. N. Salari, “Electric vehicles adoption behaviour: Synthesising the technology readiness index with environmentalism values and instrumental attributes,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 164, pp. 60–81, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.tra.2022.07.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. E. Higueras-Castillo, F. Liébana-Cabanillas, M. A. Dos Santos, K. Zulauf and R. Wagner, “Do you believe it? Green advertising skepticism and perceived value in buying electric vehicles,” Sustainable Development, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 4671–4685, 2024, doi:10.1002/sd.2932. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. P. Chaturvedi, K. Kulshreshtha and V. Tripathi, “Exploring consumers' motives for electric vehicle adoption: Bridging the attitude–behavior gap,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 4174–4192, 2023, doi:10.1108/BIJ-10-2021-0618. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. A. H. Halse, K. E. Hauge and E. T. Isaksen, “Local incentives and electric vehicle adoption,” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 145–180, 2025, doi:10.1086/730590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. R. Zaino, V. Ahmed and A. M. Alhammadi, “Electric vehicle adoption: A comprehensive systematic review of technological, environmental, organizational and policy impacts,” World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 15, no. 8, 375, 2024, doi:10.3390/wevj15080375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, 1970, doi:10.1177/001316447003000308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria