Managing Conflict Under Constraint: System Capacity, Counselling, Documentation and External Pressure in Ghanaian Boarding Senior High Schools

Authors

Peter Simon Kwofie

Counselling and Student Support Unit, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa (Ghana)

Mark Owusu-Ansah

UMaT Press, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa (Ghana)

Simon Kwadwo Mensa

Human Resource Unit, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600120

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 1593-1605

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-27

Accepted: 2026-06-01

Published: 2026-06-18

Abstract

Conflict management in boarding Senior High Schools is often discussed in terms of leadership style, disciplinary firmness, or interpersonal diplomacy. This article argues that heads' conflict-management decisions are also shaped by the institutional capacity available to support fair and timely action. Drawing on a qualitative multiple-case study involving 24 participants across two public boarding Senior High Schools in the Tarkwa-Nsuaem Municipality of Ghana, the article explores how school actors perceived counselling systems, documentation practices, role clarity, prefect protection, and external pressure as shaping conflict management practices. Data were generated through eight semi-structured interviews with heads, senior house staff, and guidance and counselling coordinators, and two focus group discussions with student leaders. Findings show that conflict-management choices were shaped by severity, evidence, recurrence, school rules, party identity, pastoral concerns, and parent/community pressure. The main constraints included limited counselling capacity, uneven documentation practices, role ambiguity, hidden bullying, prefect vulnerability, resource pressures, and external interference. The article argues that the two cases point to the importance of whole-school systems that integrate counselling, fair procedure, case records, staff development, student voice, stakeholder education, and clear appeal pathways. It contributes to school leadership literature by reframing conflict management as a system-capacity issue rather than merely an individual leadership task. The study’s scope is limited to two schools and relies on reported experiences; future research should expand the sample, incorporate direct observation and documentary evidence, and involve a broader range of stakeholders—including parents, ordinary students, and district education officials—to develop a more comprehensive and transferable school-based conflict-management framework.

Keywords

conflict management; school leadership; counselling; documentation; Senior High Schools; Ghana; boarding schools; external pressure; procedural justice; institutional capacity

Downloads

References

1. Afful-Broni, A. (2012). Conflict management in Ghanaian schools: A case study of the role of leadership of Winneba Senior High School. International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 2(2), 65–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akyina, K. O., & Manu, J. (2024). How alternative strategies to corporal punishment can be made more effective in Ghanaian basic schools: Perceptions of teachers. European Journal of Psychological Research, 11(6), 29–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cohen, J., McCabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Coleman, P. T., Deutsch, M., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organisational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ghana Education Service. (2016). Tools for positive discipline in basic schools. Guidance and Counselling Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., & Gerewitz, J. (2016). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(4), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.929950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hopkins, B. (2004). Just schools: A whole-school approach to restorative justice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kumah, P. K., Ayikue, M. A., & Obeng, C. (2025). Comparing perceptions of students, teachers, and parents on disciplinary issues in public Senior High Schools: A case study of schools in Kumasi, Ghana. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 6(5), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2025657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Morrison, B. (2007). Restoring safe school communities: A whole-school response to bullying, violence and alienation. Federation Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Panford-Quainoo, E., Oppong Asante, K., & Osei-Tutu, A. (2024). Practices and challenges of counselling in selected senior high schools in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 34(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/20556365231224478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sam, V. N. (2020). Conflict resolution in Senior High Schools in Ghana. International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 11(2), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles