Managing Ethnic Relations in Malaysia: Policies, Practices, and Prospects for National Cohesion

This article analyzes Malaysia's management of ethnic relations through the integration of policy frameworks, institutional practices, and quotidian social dynamics to maintain national cohesion. This paper contextualizes Malaysia’s experience within wider comparative discussions by utilizing both historical and modern academic perspectives from Furnivall’s concept of the plural society to Anderson’s imagined communities and also revisited the Barth’s ethnic boundary theory, social identity theory, and intergroup contact theory. It then examines the development of Malaysia's policy framework (constitutional provisions, redistributive policies, education and language policies, community cohesion programs), emphasizes practices in schools, universities, workplaces, and civil society, and identifies new challenges in the digital age. The article contends that Malaysia's model is optimally comprehended as a stratified initiative by integrating state-directed redistribution, consociational negotiation, and micro-level interaction that necessitates constant revision to combat inequality, polarization, and online detriments. Suggestions are made for policies that will make the management of ethnic relations in Malaysia stronger, more evidence-based, more inclusive, and more prepared for the future.

Ethnic relations; Malaysia; social cohesion

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barth, F. (Ed.). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Little, Brown & Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Embong, A. R. (2001). Negara-bangsa: Proses dan perbahasan. Penerbit UKM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Embong, A. R. (2002). State-led modernization and the new middle class in Malaysia. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Furnivall, J. S. (1948). Colonial policy and practice: A comparative study of Burma and Netherlands India. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gomez, E. T., & Jomo, K. S. (1999). Malaysia’s political economy: Politics, patronage and profits. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hirschman, C. (1987). The meaning and measurement of ethnicity in Malaysia: An analysis of census classifications. The Journal of Asian Studies, 46(3), 555–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mansor, M. N. (2012). Kerencaman sosial dan penipisan batas etnik. Institut Kajian Etnik (KITA), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mansor, M. N. (2021). Changing ethnic boundary, social differentiation and the Malaysian nation: Roots of Malaysian stability. KITA-UKM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Renan, E. (1996). What is a nation? In H. K. Bhabha (Ed.), Nation and narration (pp. 8–22). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Shamsul, A. B. (1996). Debating about identity in Malaysia: A discourse analysis. Southeast Asian Studies, 34(3), 476–499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shamsul, A. B. (2001). A history of an identity, an identity of a history: The idea and practice of ‘Malayness’ in Malaysia reconsidered. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 32(3), 355–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shamsul, A. B. (2015). Politics of language and nation-of-intent in Malaysia (Siri Kertas Kajian Etnik). KITA-UKM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Nelson-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Weiss, M. L. (2006). Protest and possibilities: Civil society and coalitions for political change in Malaysia. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study