Managing Nation Building: Malaysian Scholars Perspective

Authors

Aizathul Hani Abd Hamid

Department of Social Science, Centre for General Studies and Cocurricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor (Malaysia)

Khairol Anuar Kamri

Department of Social Science, Centre for General Studies and Cocurricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100288

Subject Category: Sociology

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 3708-3713

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-20

Accepted: 2025-11-26

Published: 2025-12-08

Abstract

This article explores the discourse of nation-building in Malaysia by examining the contributions of three leading scholars which are Prof. Shamsul Amri Baharuddin, Prof. Abdul Rahman Embong, and Prof. Mansor Mohd Noor. Shamsul emphasizes the dialectics between two social realities and the concept of nations-of-intent; Abdul Rahman highlights the role of the nation-state and the middle class in shaping national identity; while Mansor focuses on the thinning of ethnic boundaries and the emergence of a national ethos through micro-level interactions. By conducting a comparative analysis, this study argues that nation-building in Malaysia is a continuous, unfinished project requiring the integration of official discourse, socio-economic structures, and everyday lived experiences. The article further situates Malaysian scholarship within broader theoretical debates and discusses its contemporary implications for policy, education, and social cohesion.

Keywords

Nation-building, Malaysia, Shamsul A.B.,

Downloads

References

1. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Embong, A. R. (2001). Negara-bangsa: Proses dan perbahasan. Bangi: Penerbit UKM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Embong, A. R. (2002). State-led modernization and the new middle class in Malaysia. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Furnivall, J. S. (1948). Colonial policy and practice: A comparative study of Burma and Netherlands India. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mansor, M. N. (2012). Kerencaman sosial dan penipisan batas etnik. Bangi: Institut Kajian Etnik (KITA). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mansor, M. N. (2021). Changing ethnic boundary, social differentiation and the Malaysian nation: Roots of Malaysian stability. Bangi: KITA-UKM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Renan, E. (1996). What is a nation? In H. K. Bhabha (Ed.), Nation and narration (pp. 8–22). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Shamsul, A. B. (1996). Debating about identity in Malaysia: A discourse analysis. Southeast Asian Studies, 34(3), 476–499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Shamsul, A. B. (2001). A history of an identity, an identity of a history: The idea and practice of ‘Malayness’ in Malaysia reconsidered. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 32(3), 355–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Shamsul, A. B. (2015). Politics of language and nation-of-intent in Malaysia. Siri Kertas Kajian Etnik, KITA-UKM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles