Mapping the Evidence Landscape of Platform-Based E-Commerce Innovation: A PRISMA-ScR Scoping Review

Authors

Ang Hong Loong

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Suddin Lada

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Brahim Chekima

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Rudy Ansar

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Erick Karunia

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Tarakan, North Kalimantan, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Shalahuddin Shalahuddin

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Tarakan, North Kalimantan, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Pang Yeng Yuan

Faculty of Accountancy, Finance and Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (TAR UMT), Sabah Branch, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0183

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 2455-2466

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-02

Accepted: 2026-09-07

Published: 2026-09-23

Abstract

Today, e-commerce innovation comes from platforms as well as social commerce, group purchasing, Consumer-to-Manufacturer (C2M) models, and platform ecosystems, but the evidence is scattered across disciplines and contexts. Characteristics and findings from the studies, platform and stakeholder context, theoretical perspective, research methodology, geographic scope, and gaps in evidence were mapped in this scoping review. PRISMA-ScR and Population-Concept-Context framework were used in the search process and SciSpace Deep Search, SciSpace Full-Text Search, and Google Scholar yielded 2,602 records. A total of 2158 records were screened after the removal of the 444 duplicate records; 61 reports were sought, 49 full texts were assessed, 28 were excluded for documented reasons and 21 sources were included. The studies included were mainly journal articles, mainly focusing on the country of China, analytical modelling and case-study research, all published between 2013 and 2025. The theory of platform ecosystems and C2M were the most widely discussed topics, and topics like sustainability, governance, policy, cross-cultural consumer evidence and emerging-market contexts were all relatively under-researched. The review features a clear evidence map and suggests geographic, methodological, theoretical and contextual priorities for future research.

Keywords

Scoping review; e-commerce platforms; evidence mapping; research gaps; platform ecosystems

Downloads

References

1. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cai, Y., Xue, W., & Wu, Y. (2023). Social media retailing in the creator economy. Omega. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cao, E., & Li, H. (2021). Group buying with continuous price decreasing mechanism. Omega. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, L., Liu, Y., & Zhou, K. (2024). Network effects and platform growth in social commerce ecosystems. Decision Support Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dai, X., Chow, P.-S., Zheng, J.-H., & Chiu, C.-H. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product design on the web: An analysis of online designer platforms. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, Article 248170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dymenko, R., & Kolesnyk, A. (2024). Creating a platform of own brand. Prichornomors'ki Ekonomichni Studii, (85). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hu, B., Meng, Q., & Xu, D. (2023). Platform governance and group-purchasing mechanisms in social commerce. International Journal of Production Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hu, Q., He, L., & Cao, Z. (2021). Group-buying pricing strategies on online retail platforms. European Journal of Operational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), Article 69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li, M., Wang, F., & Zhang, Q. (2025). The Pinduoduo model: Group-purchasing, gamification, and agricultural supply chain integration. Journal of Business Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liu, X., Zhang, S., Lin, Y., & Xie, Y. (2016). Enhancing the health and sustainability of e-commerce ecosystem by bringing manufacturers online: Evidence from Tao-Factory. [Conference proceeding details incomplete], 815–823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lyu, G., Hu, H., Zhuang, G., & Xi, C. (2023). C2M strategies on an e-commerce platform under brand competition. Transportation Research Part E. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), Article 143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Orman, L. V. (2016). Information markets over trust networks. Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 529–551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sun, H., Chen, X., & Gao, L. (2023). Blue Ocean Strategy in digital commerce: Empirical evidence from emerging platform ecosystems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tang, X. (2025). Research on the mechanism and path of rural e-commerce live streaming empowering rural revitalization. Social Sciences & Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary: Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., . . . Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Uchańska-Bieniusiewicz, A. (2024). Innovations with sustainability potential within the ultra-fast business model. Corporate Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wang, H. (2025). Maternal and child e-commerce as a new Blue Ocean: Research on supply-side gaps and platform-based strategies. Dian Zi Shang Wu Ping Lun. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wang, S., & Ma, S. (2023). Is product customization always beneficial in the context of C2M platforms? A signaling theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wei, P., Li, Y., Ma, B., & Ren, S. (2022). Fostering customer bargaining and e-procurement through a modified English auction with a heterogeneous group buying. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(3), 810–824. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Weng, X., & Zheng, J. (2022). Value creation in platform ecosystems: Social commerce perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhang, X., Sheng, G., Chen, L., Lu, X.-D., Ming, X., & Qiu, S. (2024). An innovative model of personalized product service system (PPSS) for open community collaborative supply (OCCS). Journal of Cleaner Production. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zhang, Y. (2025). Differentiated digital-intelligent supply chain strategies in Chinese e-commerce platforms: A comparative study of JD.com, Alibaba, and Pinduoduo. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 239(1), 171–179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhou, X., Zhang, X., Diao, W., & Zhang, J. (2025). Strategic analysis of the emerging S2b2C model. Journal of Interactive Marketing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles