Market Efficiency and Price Integration in the Malaysian Bitcoin Market

This study examines the weak-form efficiency and international price integration of Malaysia’s regulated Bitcoin market. Daily closing prices for Bitcoin traded in Malaysian ringgit (BTC/MYR), the international Bitcoin price in US dollars (BTC/USD), and the USD/MYR exchange rate are analysed over the 2021–2026 period using secondary market data. The international Bitcoin price is converted into ringgit to provide a currency-consistent benchmark for the local market. Random-walk behaviour is evaluated using the runs test, Ljung–Box test and variance-ratio test. Market integration is examined through unit-root tests, Engle–Granger cointegration analysis and an error-correction model. The daily results provide mixed evidence regarding weak-form efficiency. Although the runs test does not reject randomness in return signs, the Ljung–Box and variance-ratio results indicate dependence at selected horizons. This dependence becomes weaker in the weekly analysis, suggesting that the efficiency assessment is sensitive to data frequency. The local and international Bitcoin prices are cointegrated, with a long-run coefficient close to unity. The error-correction results further show that deviations from the long-run relationship are corrected over time and that international Bitcoin returns significantly influence short-run local price movements. Nevertheless, a small local price premium and residual volatility clustering remain. Overall, Malaysia’s Bitcoin market is closely integrated with the international market but is not perfectly efficient at all horizons. The findings support policies promoting transparent benchmark pricing, market surveillance, adequate liquidity and volatility-risk controls among Malaysian digital asset exchanges.

Bitcoin; market efficiency; random walk; price integration; digital asset exchange JEL classifications: C22; G14; G15; O33

1. Bariviera, A. F. (2017). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach. Economics Letters, 161, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.09.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brandvold, M., Molnár, P., Vagstad, K., & Valstad, O. C. A. (2015). Price discovery on Bitcoin exchanges. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 36, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2015.02.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kok, S. C., Pinjaman, S., & Geetha, C. (2025). The predictability of the Ringgit Malaysia against the United States dollar exchange rate. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(15), 1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.915EC00727 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lamont, O. A., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Anomalies: The law of one price in financial markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003772034952 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/65.2.297 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Makarov, I., & Schoar, A. (2020). Trading and arbitrage in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(2), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mohd Thas Thaker, H., & Ah Mand, A. (2021). Bitcoin and stock markets: A revisit of relationship. Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies, 29(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDQS-07-2020-0016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nadarajah, S., & Chu, J. (2017). On the inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 150, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pieters, G., & Vivanco, S. (2017). Financial regulations and price inconsistencies across Bitcoin markets. Information Economics and Policy, 39, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pinjaman, S. (2025). Digital sukuk: The evolution and potential of digital Islamic bonds. In T. Endress & Y. F. Badir (Eds.), Business and management in Asia: Finance and investments in the digital age (pp. 139–155). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3452-1_9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pinjaman, S., Kok, S. C., & Janin, Y. (2025). Market efficiency of the Malaysian ringgit against selected ASEAN currencies exchange rates for pre-, during, and post-COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(15), 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.915EC00761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pinjaman, S., Kok, S. C., Aralas, S., Basuki, A. T., Hadi, S., Nugraha, P., & Darsono, S. N. A. C. (2026). Pandemic shocks and time-varying weak-form efficiency in ASEAN foreign exchange markets: An empirical investigation. Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 16(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v16i1.15560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Securities Commission Malaysia. (2019, June 4). SC registers three digital asset exchanges. https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media/media-release/sc-registers-three-digital-asset-exchanges [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Securities Commission Malaysia. (2026, May 20). Guidelines on recognized markets. https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/guidelines/recognizedmarkets [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sensoy, A. (2019). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A high-frequency analysis with alternative currencies. Finance Research Letters, 28, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Taasim, S. I., Teruki, N. A., Sabu, Z., Pinjaman, S., & Mojolou, R. A. (2025). Ringgit Malaysia uncertainty spillover from Google Trends uncertainty. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(15), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.915EC0022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tiwari, A. K., Jana, R. K., Das, D., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Informational efficiency of Bitcoin: An extension. Economics Letters, 163, 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.12.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tran, V. L., & Leirvik, T. (2020). Efficiency in the markets of crypto-currencies. Finance Research Letters, 35, Article 101382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Twelve Data. (2026a). Bitcoin to Malaysian ringgit (BTC/MYR): Historical data. Retrieved July 15, 2026, from https://twelvedata.com/markets/615816/crypto/luno/btc-myr/historical-data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Twelve Data. (2026b). Bitcoin to US dollar (BTC/USD): Historical data. Retrieved July 15, 2026, from https://twelvedata.com/markets/499377/crypto/coinbase-pro/btc-usd/historical-data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Twelve Data. (2026c). US dollar/Malaysian ringgit (USD/MYR): Historical data. Retrieved July 15, 2026, from https://twelvedata.com/markets/104355/forex/usd-myr/historical-data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Urquhart, A. (2016). The inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 148, 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.09.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wald, A., & Wolfowitz, J. (1940). On a test whether two samples are from the same population. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ye, J. (2022). Bitcoin cross-market price dynamics: Three essays looking into consensus, fear and memory [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton]. University of Southampton Institutional Repository. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/472089/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zhou, T. X., Osman, Z., & Pinjaman, S. (2023). The impact of financial technology on commercial banks: A case study of China. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(7), Article e002443. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i7.2443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria