Mechanical Behaviour of Sustainable Epoxy Hybrid Biocomposites Derived from Tea Bagasse and Banana Peel Residues

Authors

Khairum Bin Hamzah

Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Industri dan Pembuatan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia, (Malaysia)

Fitri Ghanim Bin Mohammed

Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Industri dan Pembuatan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia, (Malaysia)

Irianto

Department-General Education, Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700885

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 13098-13106

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-01

Accepted: 2026-08-06

Published: 2026-08-14

Abstract

Agricultural and food-processing residues offer a renewable source of lignocellulosic reinforcement for polymer composites, but their environmental value must be considered together with functional performance. This study evaluates epoxy-based hybrid biocomposites containing tea bagasse (TB) and banana peel (BP) residues to identify compositions that balance residue utilisation with tensile, flexural and impact behaviour. Six formulations were prepared: neat epoxy and five composites containing 40 wt.% total residue with TB:BP ratios of 0:40, 10:30, 20:20, 30:10 and 40:0; the remaining 60 wt.% was epoxy resin. Residues were washed, water-soaked, sun-dried, ground and sieved before hand lay-up and ambient curing. Five replicate specimens per formulation were evaluated by tensile, three-point flexural and Charpy impact testing using the applicable ASTM procedures. Neat epoxy recorded the highest tensile (58.72 MPa) and flexural (275.53 MPa) strengths. Among residue-filled formulations, 0TB/40BP produced the highest tensile strength (16.18 MPa), whereas the balanced 20TB/20BP formulation achieved the highest flexural strength (94.53 MPa). The 10TB/30BP hybrid showed the best impact energy among the biocomposites (0.344 J), approaching the neat-epoxy value of 0.354 J. Increasing TB content generally reduced tensile and flexural performance, indicating that interfacial adhesion, particle geometry and void formation governed load transfer. The results demonstrate composition-specific rather than universal hybrid synergy. From a sustainability perspective, replacing 40 wt.% of the formulation with minimally processed residues may reduce demand for virgin resin and divert organic waste, although environmental superiority cannot be claimed without life-cycle, durability and end-of-life assessment. The 20TB/20BP and 10TB/30BP formulations are promising candidates for low-load, non-structural applications where flexural or impact performance, respectively, is prioritised.

Keywords

Sustainability

Downloads

References

1. Khalid, M. Y., Al Rashid, A., Arif, Z. U., Ahmed, W., Arshad, H., & Zaidi, A. A. (2021). Natural fiber reinforced composites: Sustainable materials for emerging applications. Results in Engineering, 11, 100263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Fragassa, C., Vannucchi de Camargo, F., & Santulli, C. (2024). Sustainable biocomposites: Harnessing the potential of waste seed-based fillers in eco-friendly materials. Sustainability, 16(4), 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Birniwa, A. H., Abdullahi, S. S., Ali, M., Mohammad, R. E. A., Jagaba, A. H., Amran, M., Avudaiappan, S., Maureira-Carsalade, N., & Saavedra Flores, E. I. (2023). Recent trends in treatment and fabrication of plant-based fiber-reinforced epoxy composite: A review. Journal of Composites Science, 7(3), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Sienkiewicz, N., Dominic, M., & Parameswaranpillai, J. (2022). Natural fillers as potential modifying agents for epoxy composition: A review. Polymers, 14(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14020265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lee, C. H., Khalina, A., & Lee, S. H. (2021). Importance of interfacial adhesion condition on characterization of plant-fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review. Polymers, 13(3), 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Kumar, D., Mahakur, V. K., & Bhowmik, S. (2024). Utilization of banana peel as bio-filler to develop bio-composite materials and characterize their physical, mechanical, thermal, and tribological characteristics. Polymer Bulletin, 81, 16175-16196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-024-05464-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shahapurkar, K., M. C., K., Chenrayan, V., Kanaginahal, G., Gebremaryam, G., Nik-Ghazali, N.-N., Kuan, T. M., Ariffin, A. M., Arunachalam, A., Fouad, Y., & Soudagar, M. E. M. (2024). Flexural behavior of epoxy composites reinforced with banana fibers in different architectures: Experimental, analytical, and numerical approaches. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14, 21603-21618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05872-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhardwaj, G., Pamuluri, V. K. N., Dev, A., Khurana, S., Mohanavel, V., Ramesh, S., Abu Osman, N. A., Kaliappan, S., & Soudagar, M. E. M. (2026). Characterization study on mechanical, wear, and water absorption properties of stacking ordered natural kenaf/sisal fiber and cellulose particle reinforced epoxy biocomposite. Chemical Papers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-026-05080-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dogan, A., Mahmat, A., & Agar, S. (2025). Investigation of mechanical properties of jute and tea waste-reinforced epoxy composite material produced by vacuum assisted resin infusion molding. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 34, 22873-22881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-12040-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kaya, H., Ekrem, M., & Uslugil, Y. (2025). Tea stem waste powders for epoxy-based composites: Processing, mechanical properties, and fracture behavior. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 12(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.1766935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sahu, D. P., Das, R., & Mohanty, S. C. (2025). Sustainable sandwich plates: Investigating the dynamic and tensile properties of jute fibre-reinforced face layers with TiO2-infused tea waste epoxy cores. Bulletin of Materials Science, 48, 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-025-03450-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Singh, N., Ogunseitan, O. A., Wong, M. H., & Tang, Y. (2022). Sustainable materials alternative to petrochemical plastics pollution: A review analysis. Sustainable Horizons, 2, 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Capretti, M., Giammaria, V., Santulli, C., Boria, S., & Del Bianco, G. (2023). Use of bio-epoxies and their effect on the performance of polymer composites: A critical review. Polymers, 15(24), 4733. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15244733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Sahoo, K., Nepal, P., Runge, T., & Bergman, R. (2023). Environmental impacts and techno-economic assessments of biobased products: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 180, 113302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Prasad, V., Alliyankal Vijayakumar, A., Jose, T., & George, S. C. (2024). A comprehensive review of sustainability in natural-fiber-reinforced polymers. Sustainability, 16(3), 1223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles