Mediated Witnessing Under Fire: Digital War Narratives, Precarity, and the Fragmentation of Social Life in Iran
Authors
Gender Studies, Abo Akademi University (Finland)
Near East University (Finland)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601275
Subject Category: Communication
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 18597-18608
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-24
Accepted: 2026-06-29
Published: 2026-07-16
Abstract
This article explores how civilians in Iran experience, narrate, and make sense of the 2026- armed conflict involving Iran, the United States, and Israel through digitally mediated storytelling and reflections on social suffering. It approaches platforms such as Instagram not merely as channels of communication but as spaces of mediated witnessing and vernacular knowledge production, where individuals document and interpret violence under conditions of censorship, prolonged internet shutdowns, infrastructural breakdown, and significant political risk. The analysis draws on first-person testimonies, affective expressions, and narrative fragments circulating online, alongside open-ended responses from participants in Iran and the diaspora. These materials are examined through a qualitative, multi-method approach that combines narrative inquiry with reflexive thematic analysis.
The findings suggest that war is not experienced as a discreet or bounded event; rather, it unfolds as an ongoing psychosocial condition embedded in everyday life. Participants’ narratives show how violence becomes embodied, normalized, and spatially diffuse, reshaping temporal experience, domestic environments, and bodily states marked by fear, fatigue, and illness. At the same time, shared exposure to violence does not necessarily generate collective cohesion. Instead, it often produces fragmentation, erodes interpersonal trust, and intensifies moral polarization, complicating notions of belonging. While moments of care and mutual support do emerge, these forms of solidarity remain fragile, situational, and often ambivalent.
Keywords
Mediated witnessing; Digital war narratives; Social fragmentation; Precarity
Downloads
References
1. Abrahamian, E. (2008). A history of modern Iran. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adib-Moghaddam, A. (2018). Psychopolitics of the Middle East: The colonial unconscious in the age of global capitalism. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Al Jazeera. (2026, April 28). How Iran has changed in two months of war. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/28/how-iran-has-changed-and-how-it-hasnt-in-two-months-of-war [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Amnesty International. (2019). A web of impunity: The killings Iran's internet shutdown hid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Amnesty International. (2023). Iran: Human rights violations and protest repression. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aouragh, M., & Alexander, A. (2011). Egypt's unfinished revolution: The role of the media and social media. Review of African Political Economy, 38(129). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Associated Press. (2025). Iranian diaspora and war divisions. https://apnews.com/article/iranian-americans-diaspora-israel-iran-war-b35ff1a944a18802b34eb388757e8d42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Article 19. (2024). Digital freedom and protest. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bajoghli, N. (2019). Iran reframed: Anxieties of power in the Islamic Republic. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bayat, A. (2010). Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bayat, A. (2022). Revolutionary life: The everyday of the Arab Spring. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Beidollahkhani, A. (2025). Visual resistance, digital counterpublics, and feminist agency in Iran's digital protests from 2018 to 2023. Discourse & Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813251380447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Campbell, R. (2002). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Chouliaraki, L. (2012). The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Polity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Dadpour, R., & Shewly, H. J. (2025). Dancing in-between: Interstitial feminist defiance in Iran's public and digital spaces. Third World Quarterly, 46(10), 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2541809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Das, V. (2007). Life and words: Violence and the descent into the ordinary. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Derakhshan, H. (2015, July 14). The web we have to save. Medium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fortier, A.-M. (2000). Migrating selves: Home, identity, and the Muslim diaspora. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Gohdes, A. R. (2020). Repression in the digital age. International Studies Quarterly, 64(3), 547–560. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Gohdes, A. R. (2023). Online controls and the protest-repression nexus in Iran. In Repression in the digital age. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Haeri, N. (2013). The ordinary lives of Muslim saints: Islam, poetry, and politics in Iran. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. IODA. (2026). A comparative look at internet shutdowns in Iran: 2019, 2022, 2025, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Iran International. (2025). Reactions to Israeli strikes on Iran. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202506134715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Keshavarzian, A. (2021). Authoritarianism and political order in Iran. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Mahdavi, P. (2020). Passionate uprisings: Iran's sexual revolution. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Maghbouleh, N. (2017). The limits of whiteness: Iranian Americans and the everyday politics of race. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Association of Internet Researchers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Martinez, D. (2026, January 15). Iran: How the Islamic Republic uses internet shutdowns as a tool of repression. The Conversation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Middle East Research and Information Project. (2026). Rethinking political change in Iran: From protest to war. https://www.merip.org/2026/06/rethinking-political-change-in-iran-from-protest-to-war/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Moqadam, M. (2025). Fractal scaling of feminist politics and the emergence of Woman, Life, Freedom movement in Iran. Social Forces, 104(2), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaf050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Mousavi, N. (2024). Dangerous remembering in volatile spaces: Activist memory work in the Iranian context. Memory Studies, 17(5), 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980241262392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Naficy, H. (1993). The making of exile cultures: Iranian television in Los Angeles. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Naderi, S. (2025). The banality of a medium: Iran's "Woman, Life, Freedom" movement in the social media mirror. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 46(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.7202/1119492ar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. NBC News. (2025). Iranian diaspora heartbreak and hope amid uncertainty. https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/iranian-diaspora-heartbreak-hope-amid-uncertainty-israel-war-rcna214391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. OONI. (2022). Technical multi-stakeholder report on internet shutdowns: Autumn 2022 protests. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Oudlajani, F. (2026). Visibility under constraint: Format publics and the politics of visibility on TikTok protest videos during the Mahsa Amini movement in Iran. International Journal of Communication, 20. https://doi.org/10.65476/nt5fcf85 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics on social media. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Sarvestany, R. S. (2026, January 18). The mobile rings in the pockets of the dead: Parents calling their children. Political Violence amid Declining Legitimacy: Patterns of State Repression. https://rasterverkosto.wordpress.com/2026/01/22/the-mobile-rings-in-the-pockets-of-the-dead-parents-calling-their-children/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Sreberny, A., & Khiabany, G. (2010). Blogistan: The internet and politics in Iran. I.B. Tauris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. The Conversation. (2026). Understanding internet shutdowns in Iran. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. The New Humanitarian. (2026, March 5). Humanitarian impacts of the war on Iran. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2026/03/05/escalating-humanitarian-impacts-us-israeli-war-iran [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2026). Iran conflict situation report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. UN News. (2025, June). Civilian impacts of Iran conflict. https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/06/1164616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. University of Washington News. (2026, March 20). Q&A: UW professor on the Iranian regime, US-Israeli strikes, and a divide among the Iranian diaspora. https://www.washington.edu/news/2026/03/20/qa-uw-professor-on-iranian-regime-us-israeli-strikes-and-a-divide-among-the-iranian-diaspora/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
- An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
- Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
- Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
- (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication