Mediating Role of Job Crafting in the Relationship Between Work Characteristics and Turnover Intentions of Young Working Adults.

This study examines the mediating role of job crafting in the relationship between work characteristics and turnover intentions among young working adults in Nigeria. Grounded in the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model and Person-Environment Fit theory, the research investigates how job content (skill variety, specialization) and context factors (working conditions, ergonomics, physical demands) predict turnover intentions, and whether job crafting serves as a behavioral mechanism in this relationship. A cross-sectional design was employed, with data collected from 350 young employees (aged 18-40) across nine higher education institutions in Imo State, Nigeria. Participants completed validated scales measuring turnover intentions, job design, and job crafting. Results from hierarchical regression analysis indicated that job variety significantly negatively predicted turnover intentions (β = -.29, p < .01). In contrast, job specialization positively predicted them (β = 0.14, p < .01). Mediation analysis using PROCESS macro revealed that job crafting partially mediated both relationships, with significant indirect effects. These findings offer actionable insights for HR professionals and organizational psychologists aiming to develop effective retention strategies by fostering job crafting and tailored job designs in Nigerian workplaces.

Job crafting, turnover intentions, work characteristics, job design, JD-R model

1. Agarwal, U.A., & Gupta, V. (2018), Relationship between job characteristic s, work engagement, conscientiousness and managers turn over intentions: A moderated analysis. Personal Review 47 (2) pp.353-377. http://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2013). Job crafting and meaningful work. In B. J. Dik, Z. S. Byrne & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 81-104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14183-005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the Theory of Work Adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44(1), 32-54. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chu, X., Li, M, and Zhang, L., (2021). Employee strengths use and turnover intention: The roles of job crafting and self efficiency. Academy of management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.11815. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Faturochman (1997), “The job characteristic theory: a review”, Buletin Psikologi Tahan, 5 (2), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R. (1980), Work Redesign, Vol. 72, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. doi:10.1016/0030- 5073(76)90016-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jacobs, E., & Roodt, G. (2007). “The development of a knowledge sharing construct to predict turnover intentions”, Aslib Proceedings, 59 (3), 229-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kooij, D. T. A. M., van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., Dorenbosch, L., & Denissen, J.J.A. (2017). Job crafting towards strengths and interests: The effects of a job crafting intervention on person-job fit and the role of age. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 971–981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kulik, C.T., Oldham, G.R. and Hackman, J.R. (1987). “Work design as an approach to personenvironment fit”, Journal of Vocational Behavior,31 (3), 278-296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463-479. doi:10.1002/job.678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Samed, S., (2006). The contribution of demographic variables: Job characteristics and job satisfaction on turnover intentions. Journal of international management studies 1 (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tett, R.P. and Meyer, J.P. (1993), “Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta-analytic findings”, Personnel Psychology, 46 (2), 259-293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tiago,E., & Miguel P.L. (2017). Crafting a calling: The mediating role of calling between challenging job demands and turnover intention. Journal of career Development, 44(1) pp 34-48. DOI: IO.1177/089484531633789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1–9. http://doi.org/10. 4102/sajip.v36i2.841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4378011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being